Cargando…
Accuracy and effectiveness of teledentistry: a systematic review of systematic reviews
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has urged healthcare systems to develop new ways to safely provide care. Telehealth has become a compelling alternative. Our purpose was to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of teledentistry for screening, diagnosis and therapeutic management of dental care i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Palgrave Macmillan UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41432-022-0257-8 |
_version_ | 1784742945962852352 |
---|---|
author | Gurgel-Juarez, Nalia Torres-Pereira, Cassius Haddad, Ana E. Sheehy, Lisa Finestone, Hillel Mallet, Karen Wiseman, Michael Hour, Kannika Flowers, Heather L. |
author_facet | Gurgel-Juarez, Nalia Torres-Pereira, Cassius Haddad, Ana E. Sheehy, Lisa Finestone, Hillel Mallet, Karen Wiseman, Michael Hour, Kannika Flowers, Heather L. |
author_sort | Gurgel-Juarez, Nalia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has urged healthcare systems to develop new ways to safely provide care. Telehealth has become a compelling alternative. Our purpose was to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of teledentistry for screening, diagnosis and therapeutic management of dental care in children and adults. Methods We conducted a systematic review (SR) of systematic reviews. Multiple databases, the grey literature and conference archives were searched. Eligible SRs included those reporting virtual screening, diagnostic investigations and therapeutic interventions. Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts, articles, critically appraised SRs and extracted the data. Results We identified 817 citations and included six SRs. The accepted SRs involved >7,000 participants, used primarily asynchronous communication for diagnostic/screening outcomes and used synchronous communication for treatment outcomes. SRs were of low quality and included 30 primary studies of our interest. Sensitivity and specificity for dental referrals and diagnostic treatment planning were higher than other index/reference tests, ranging from 80-88% and 73-95%, respectively. Treatment outcome measured patient compliance and professional supervision. Conclusion This SR provides the best existing evidence for clinical decision-making involving teledentistry. Current evidence supports teledentistry as an effective means for dental referrals, treatment planning and compliance and treatment viability. Asynchronous communication and the adoption of smartphones for image capturing are feasible and convenient for the implementation of teledentistry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9264296 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Palgrave Macmillan UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92642962022-07-08 Accuracy and effectiveness of teledentistry: a systematic review of systematic reviews Gurgel-Juarez, Nalia Torres-Pereira, Cassius Haddad, Ana E. Sheehy, Lisa Finestone, Hillel Mallet, Karen Wiseman, Michael Hour, Kannika Flowers, Heather L. Evid Based Dent Review Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has urged healthcare systems to develop new ways to safely provide care. Telehealth has become a compelling alternative. Our purpose was to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of teledentistry for screening, diagnosis and therapeutic management of dental care in children and adults. Methods We conducted a systematic review (SR) of systematic reviews. Multiple databases, the grey literature and conference archives were searched. Eligible SRs included those reporting virtual screening, diagnostic investigations and therapeutic interventions. Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts, articles, critically appraised SRs and extracted the data. Results We identified 817 citations and included six SRs. The accepted SRs involved >7,000 participants, used primarily asynchronous communication for diagnostic/screening outcomes and used synchronous communication for treatment outcomes. SRs were of low quality and included 30 primary studies of our interest. Sensitivity and specificity for dental referrals and diagnostic treatment planning were higher than other index/reference tests, ranging from 80-88% and 73-95%, respectively. Treatment outcome measured patient compliance and professional supervision. Conclusion This SR provides the best existing evidence for clinical decision-making involving teledentistry. Current evidence supports teledentistry as an effective means for dental referrals, treatment planning and compliance and treatment viability. Asynchronous communication and the adoption of smartphones for image capturing are feasible and convenient for the implementation of teledentistry. Palgrave Macmillan UK 2022-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9264296/ /pubmed/35804195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41432-022-0257-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to British Dental Association 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Review Gurgel-Juarez, Nalia Torres-Pereira, Cassius Haddad, Ana E. Sheehy, Lisa Finestone, Hillel Mallet, Karen Wiseman, Michael Hour, Kannika Flowers, Heather L. Accuracy and effectiveness of teledentistry: a systematic review of systematic reviews |
title | Accuracy and effectiveness of teledentistry: a systematic review of systematic reviews |
title_full | Accuracy and effectiveness of teledentistry: a systematic review of systematic reviews |
title_fullStr | Accuracy and effectiveness of teledentistry: a systematic review of systematic reviews |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy and effectiveness of teledentistry: a systematic review of systematic reviews |
title_short | Accuracy and effectiveness of teledentistry: a systematic review of systematic reviews |
title_sort | accuracy and effectiveness of teledentistry: a systematic review of systematic reviews |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41432-022-0257-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gurgeljuareznalia accuracyandeffectivenessofteledentistryasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT torrespereiracassius accuracyandeffectivenessofteledentistryasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT haddadanae accuracyandeffectivenessofteledentistryasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT sheehylisa accuracyandeffectivenessofteledentistryasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT finestonehillel accuracyandeffectivenessofteledentistryasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT malletkaren accuracyandeffectivenessofteledentistryasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT wisemanmichael accuracyandeffectivenessofteledentistryasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT hourkannika accuracyandeffectivenessofteledentistryasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT flowersheatherl accuracyandeffectivenessofteledentistryasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews |