Cargando…
Quantitative Characterization of Three Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors by LESA Mass Spectrometry
[Image: see text] Liquid extraction surface analysis (LESA) coupled to native mass spectrometry (MS) presents unique analytical opportunities due to its sensitivity, speed, and automation. Here, we examine whether this tool can be used to quantitatively probe protein–ligand interactions through calc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35675480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jasms.2c00024 |
_version_ | 1784742965188493312 |
---|---|
author | Illes-Toth, Eva Stubbs, Christopher J. Sisley, Emma K. Bellamy-Carter, Jeddidiah Simmonds, Anna L. Mize, Todd H. Styles, Iain B. Goodwin, Richard J. A. Cooper, Helen J. |
author_facet | Illes-Toth, Eva Stubbs, Christopher J. Sisley, Emma K. Bellamy-Carter, Jeddidiah Simmonds, Anna L. Mize, Todd H. Styles, Iain B. Goodwin, Richard J. A. Cooper, Helen J. |
author_sort | Illes-Toth, Eva |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Liquid extraction surface analysis (LESA) coupled to native mass spectrometry (MS) presents unique analytical opportunities due to its sensitivity, speed, and automation. Here, we examine whether this tool can be used to quantitatively probe protein–ligand interactions through calculation of equilibrium dissociation constants (K(d) values). We performed native LESA MS analyses for a well-characterized system comprising bovine carbonic anhydrase II and the ligands chlorothiazide, dansylamide, and sulfanilamide, and compared the results with those obtained from direct infusion mass spectrometry and surface plasmon resonance measurements. Two LESA approaches were considered: In one approach, the protein and ligand were premixed in solution before being deposited and dried onto a solid substrate for LESA sampling, and in the second, the protein alone was dried onto the substrate and the ligand was included in the LESA sampling solvent. Good agreement was found between the K(d) values derived from direct infusion MS and LESA MS when the protein and ligand were premixed; however, K(d) values determined from LESA MS measurements where the ligand was in the sampling solvent were inconsistent. Our results suggest that LESA MS is a suitable tool for quantitative analysis of protein–ligand interactions when the dried sample comprises both protein and ligand. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9264382 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92643822022-07-09 Quantitative Characterization of Three Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors by LESA Mass Spectrometry Illes-Toth, Eva Stubbs, Christopher J. Sisley, Emma K. Bellamy-Carter, Jeddidiah Simmonds, Anna L. Mize, Todd H. Styles, Iain B. Goodwin, Richard J. A. Cooper, Helen J. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom [Image: see text] Liquid extraction surface analysis (LESA) coupled to native mass spectrometry (MS) presents unique analytical opportunities due to its sensitivity, speed, and automation. Here, we examine whether this tool can be used to quantitatively probe protein–ligand interactions through calculation of equilibrium dissociation constants (K(d) values). We performed native LESA MS analyses for a well-characterized system comprising bovine carbonic anhydrase II and the ligands chlorothiazide, dansylamide, and sulfanilamide, and compared the results with those obtained from direct infusion mass spectrometry and surface plasmon resonance measurements. Two LESA approaches were considered: In one approach, the protein and ligand were premixed in solution before being deposited and dried onto a solid substrate for LESA sampling, and in the second, the protein alone was dried onto the substrate and the ligand was included in the LESA sampling solvent. Good agreement was found between the K(d) values derived from direct infusion MS and LESA MS when the protein and ligand were premixed; however, K(d) values determined from LESA MS measurements where the ligand was in the sampling solvent were inconsistent. Our results suggest that LESA MS is a suitable tool for quantitative analysis of protein–ligand interactions when the dried sample comprises both protein and ligand. American Chemical Society 2022-06-08 2022-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9264382/ /pubmed/35675480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jasms.2c00024 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Illes-Toth, Eva Stubbs, Christopher J. Sisley, Emma K. Bellamy-Carter, Jeddidiah Simmonds, Anna L. Mize, Todd H. Styles, Iain B. Goodwin, Richard J. A. Cooper, Helen J. Quantitative Characterization of Three Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors by LESA Mass Spectrometry |
title | Quantitative Characterization of Three Carbonic Anhydrase
Inhibitors by LESA Mass Spectrometry |
title_full | Quantitative Characterization of Three Carbonic Anhydrase
Inhibitors by LESA Mass Spectrometry |
title_fullStr | Quantitative Characterization of Three Carbonic Anhydrase
Inhibitors by LESA Mass Spectrometry |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative Characterization of Three Carbonic Anhydrase
Inhibitors by LESA Mass Spectrometry |
title_short | Quantitative Characterization of Three Carbonic Anhydrase
Inhibitors by LESA Mass Spectrometry |
title_sort | quantitative characterization of three carbonic anhydrase
inhibitors by lesa mass spectrometry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35675480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jasms.2c00024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT illestotheva quantitativecharacterizationofthreecarbonicanhydraseinhibitorsbylesamassspectrometry AT stubbschristopherj quantitativecharacterizationofthreecarbonicanhydraseinhibitorsbylesamassspectrometry AT sisleyemmak quantitativecharacterizationofthreecarbonicanhydraseinhibitorsbylesamassspectrometry AT bellamycarterjeddidiah quantitativecharacterizationofthreecarbonicanhydraseinhibitorsbylesamassspectrometry AT simmondsannal quantitativecharacterizationofthreecarbonicanhydraseinhibitorsbylesamassspectrometry AT mizetoddh quantitativecharacterizationofthreecarbonicanhydraseinhibitorsbylesamassspectrometry AT stylesiainb quantitativecharacterizationofthreecarbonicanhydraseinhibitorsbylesamassspectrometry AT goodwinrichardja quantitativecharacterizationofthreecarbonicanhydraseinhibitorsbylesamassspectrometry AT cooperhelenj quantitativecharacterizationofthreecarbonicanhydraseinhibitorsbylesamassspectrometry |