Cargando…
Researchers, animal support and regulatory staff: symbiosis or antagonism?
Animals are studied en masse by biologists around the world in a variety of biomedical and basic research studies. All this research benefits humankind and animals alike as it tackles a wide variety of problems ranging from those of conservation biology to medicine. Research with animal subjects is...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42826-022-00129-0 |
_version_ | 1784742975889211392 |
---|---|
author | Tsang, Benjamin Gerlai, Robert |
author_facet | Tsang, Benjamin Gerlai, Robert |
author_sort | Tsang, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Animals are studied en masse by biologists around the world in a variety of biomedical and basic research studies. All this research benefits humankind and animals alike as it tackles a wide variety of problems ranging from those of conservation biology to medicine. Research with animal subjects is a complex endeavor that requires the cooperation and collaboration of a large number of experts, from the principal investigator through technicians and vivarium staff to regulatory experts. The research must be conducted in a humane manner that adheres to acceptable practices regulated by local, state and federal guidelines, rules and the law. In this short opinion article, we examine the current state of affairs regarding how researchers, animal support staff and regulatory experts work together. We pay particular attention to potential conflicts that may arise from the occasionally distinct roles played by those involved in animal research, and we provide some suggestions as short- and long-term remedies that have not been previously discussed in the literature. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9264495 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92644952022-07-09 Researchers, animal support and regulatory staff: symbiosis or antagonism? Tsang, Benjamin Gerlai, Robert Lab Anim Res Short Communication Animals are studied en masse by biologists around the world in a variety of biomedical and basic research studies. All this research benefits humankind and animals alike as it tackles a wide variety of problems ranging from those of conservation biology to medicine. Research with animal subjects is a complex endeavor that requires the cooperation and collaboration of a large number of experts, from the principal investigator through technicians and vivarium staff to regulatory experts. The research must be conducted in a humane manner that adheres to acceptable practices regulated by local, state and federal guidelines, rules and the law. In this short opinion article, we examine the current state of affairs regarding how researchers, animal support staff and regulatory experts work together. We pay particular attention to potential conflicts that may arise from the occasionally distinct roles played by those involved in animal research, and we provide some suggestions as short- and long-term remedies that have not been previously discussed in the literature. BioMed Central 2022-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9264495/ /pubmed/35804465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42826-022-00129-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Tsang, Benjamin Gerlai, Robert Researchers, animal support and regulatory staff: symbiosis or antagonism? |
title | Researchers, animal support and regulatory staff: symbiosis or antagonism? |
title_full | Researchers, animal support and regulatory staff: symbiosis or antagonism? |
title_fullStr | Researchers, animal support and regulatory staff: symbiosis or antagonism? |
title_full_unstemmed | Researchers, animal support and regulatory staff: symbiosis or antagonism? |
title_short | Researchers, animal support and regulatory staff: symbiosis or antagonism? |
title_sort | researchers, animal support and regulatory staff: symbiosis or antagonism? |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42826-022-00129-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsangbenjamin researchersanimalsupportandregulatorystaffsymbiosisorantagonism AT gerlairobert researchersanimalsupportandregulatorystaffsymbiosisorantagonism |