Cargando…

Risk and benefit for umbrella trials in oncology: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Umbrella clinical trials in precision oncology are designed to tailor therapies to the specific genetic changes within a tumor. Little is known about the risk/benefit ratio for umbrella clinical trials. The aim of our systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strzebonska, Karolina, Blukacz, Mateusz, Wasylewski, Mateusz T., Polak, Maciej, Gyawali, Bishal, Waligora, Marcin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35799149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02420-2
_version_ 1784742977708490752
author Strzebonska, Karolina
Blukacz, Mateusz
Wasylewski, Mateusz T.
Polak, Maciej
Gyawali, Bishal
Waligora, Marcin
author_facet Strzebonska, Karolina
Blukacz, Mateusz
Wasylewski, Mateusz T.
Polak, Maciej
Gyawali, Bishal
Waligora, Marcin
author_sort Strzebonska, Karolina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Umbrella clinical trials in precision oncology are designed to tailor therapies to the specific genetic changes within a tumor. Little is known about the risk/benefit ratio for umbrella clinical trials. The aim of our systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles in cancer umbrella trials testing targeted drugs or a combination of targeted therapy with chemotherapy. METHODS: Our study was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020171494). We searched Embase and PubMed for cancer umbrella trials testing targeted agents or a combination of targeted therapies with chemotherapy. We included solid tumor studies published between 1 January 2006 and 7 October 2019. We measured the risk using drug-related grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs), and the benefit by objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). When possible, data were meta-analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 6207 records identified, we included 31 sub-trials or arms of nine umbrella trials (N = 1637). The pooled overall ORR was 17.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.5–25.9). The ORR for targeted therapies in the experimental arms was significantly lower than the ORR for a combination of targeted therapy drugs with chemotherapy: 13.3% vs 39.0%; p = 0.005. The median PFS was 2.4 months (95% CI 1.9–2.9), and the median OS was 7.1 months (95% CI 6.1–8.4). The overall drug-related death rate (drug-related grade 5 AEs rate) was 0.8% (95% CI 0.3–1.4), and the average drug-related grade 3/4 AE rate per person was 0.45 (95% CI 0.40–0.50). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that, on average, one in five cancer patients in umbrella trials published between 1 January 2006 and 7 October 2019 responded to a given therapy, while one in 125 died due to drug toxicity. Our findings do not support the expectation of increased patient benefit in cancer umbrella trials. Further studies should investigate whether umbrella trial design and the precision oncology approach improve patient outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-022-02420-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9264503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92645032022-07-09 Risk and benefit for umbrella trials in oncology: a systematic review and meta-analysis Strzebonska, Karolina Blukacz, Mateusz Wasylewski, Mateusz T. Polak, Maciej Gyawali, Bishal Waligora, Marcin BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Umbrella clinical trials in precision oncology are designed to tailor therapies to the specific genetic changes within a tumor. Little is known about the risk/benefit ratio for umbrella clinical trials. The aim of our systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles in cancer umbrella trials testing targeted drugs or a combination of targeted therapy with chemotherapy. METHODS: Our study was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020171494). We searched Embase and PubMed for cancer umbrella trials testing targeted agents or a combination of targeted therapies with chemotherapy. We included solid tumor studies published between 1 January 2006 and 7 October 2019. We measured the risk using drug-related grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs), and the benefit by objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). When possible, data were meta-analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 6207 records identified, we included 31 sub-trials or arms of nine umbrella trials (N = 1637). The pooled overall ORR was 17.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.5–25.9). The ORR for targeted therapies in the experimental arms was significantly lower than the ORR for a combination of targeted therapy drugs with chemotherapy: 13.3% vs 39.0%; p = 0.005. The median PFS was 2.4 months (95% CI 1.9–2.9), and the median OS was 7.1 months (95% CI 6.1–8.4). The overall drug-related death rate (drug-related grade 5 AEs rate) was 0.8% (95% CI 0.3–1.4), and the average drug-related grade 3/4 AE rate per person was 0.45 (95% CI 0.40–0.50). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that, on average, one in five cancer patients in umbrella trials published between 1 January 2006 and 7 October 2019 responded to a given therapy, while one in 125 died due to drug toxicity. Our findings do not support the expectation of increased patient benefit in cancer umbrella trials. Further studies should investigate whether umbrella trial design and the precision oncology approach improve patient outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-022-02420-2. BioMed Central 2022-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9264503/ /pubmed/35799149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02420-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Strzebonska, Karolina
Blukacz, Mateusz
Wasylewski, Mateusz T.
Polak, Maciej
Gyawali, Bishal
Waligora, Marcin
Risk and benefit for umbrella trials in oncology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Risk and benefit for umbrella trials in oncology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Risk and benefit for umbrella trials in oncology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Risk and benefit for umbrella trials in oncology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Risk and benefit for umbrella trials in oncology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Risk and benefit for umbrella trials in oncology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort risk and benefit for umbrella trials in oncology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35799149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02420-2
work_keys_str_mv AT strzebonskakarolina riskandbenefitforumbrellatrialsinoncologyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT blukaczmateusz riskandbenefitforumbrellatrialsinoncologyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wasylewskimateuszt riskandbenefitforumbrellatrialsinoncologyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT polakmaciej riskandbenefitforumbrellatrialsinoncologyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gyawalibishal riskandbenefitforumbrellatrialsinoncologyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT waligoramarcin riskandbenefitforumbrellatrialsinoncologyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis