Cargando…
Ways to unravel the clinical potential of carbon ions for head and neck cancer reirradiation: dosimetric comparison and local failure pattern analysis as part of the prospective randomized CARE trial
BACKGROUND: Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) yields biophysical advantages compared to photons but randomized studies for the reirradiation setting are pending. The aim of the current project was to evaluate potential clinical benefits and drawbacks of CIRT compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02093-4 |
_version_ | 1784742981911183360 |
---|---|
author | Held, Thomas Tessonnier, Thomas Franke, Henrik Regnery, Sebastian Bauer, Lukas Weusthof, Katharina Harrabi, Semi Herfarth, Klaus Mairani, Andrea Debus, Jürgen Adeberg, Sebastian |
author_facet | Held, Thomas Tessonnier, Thomas Franke, Henrik Regnery, Sebastian Bauer, Lukas Weusthof, Katharina Harrabi, Semi Herfarth, Klaus Mairani, Andrea Debus, Jürgen Adeberg, Sebastian |
author_sort | Held, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) yields biophysical advantages compared to photons but randomized studies for the reirradiation setting are pending. The aim of the current project was to evaluate potential clinical benefits and drawbacks of CIRT compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in recurrent head and neck cancer. METHODS: Dose-volume parameters and local failure patterns of CIRT compared to VMAT were evaluate in 16 patients from the randomized CARE trial on head and neck cancer reirradiation. RESULTS: Despite an increased target dose, CIRT resulted in significantly reduced organ at risk (OAR) dose across all patients (− 8.7% Dmean). The dose-volume benefits were most pronounced in the brainstem (− 20.7% Dmax) and the optic chiasma (− 13.0% Dmax). The most frequent local failure was type E (extraneous; 50%), followed type B (peripheral; 33%) and type A (central; 17%). In one patient with type A biological and/or dosimetric failure after CIRT, mMKM dose recalculation revealed reduced target coverage. CONCLUSIONS: CIRT resulted in highly improved critical OAR sparing compared to VMAT across all head and neck cancer reirradiation scenarios despite an increased prescription dose. Local failure pattern analysis revealed further potential CIRT specific clinical benefits and potential pitfalls with regard to image-guidance and biological dose-optimization. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02093-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9264522 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92645222022-07-09 Ways to unravel the clinical potential of carbon ions for head and neck cancer reirradiation: dosimetric comparison and local failure pattern analysis as part of the prospective randomized CARE trial Held, Thomas Tessonnier, Thomas Franke, Henrik Regnery, Sebastian Bauer, Lukas Weusthof, Katharina Harrabi, Semi Herfarth, Klaus Mairani, Andrea Debus, Jürgen Adeberg, Sebastian Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) yields biophysical advantages compared to photons but randomized studies for the reirradiation setting are pending. The aim of the current project was to evaluate potential clinical benefits and drawbacks of CIRT compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in recurrent head and neck cancer. METHODS: Dose-volume parameters and local failure patterns of CIRT compared to VMAT were evaluate in 16 patients from the randomized CARE trial on head and neck cancer reirradiation. RESULTS: Despite an increased target dose, CIRT resulted in significantly reduced organ at risk (OAR) dose across all patients (− 8.7% Dmean). The dose-volume benefits were most pronounced in the brainstem (− 20.7% Dmax) and the optic chiasma (− 13.0% Dmax). The most frequent local failure was type E (extraneous; 50%), followed type B (peripheral; 33%) and type A (central; 17%). In one patient with type A biological and/or dosimetric failure after CIRT, mMKM dose recalculation revealed reduced target coverage. CONCLUSIONS: CIRT resulted in highly improved critical OAR sparing compared to VMAT across all head and neck cancer reirradiation scenarios despite an increased prescription dose. Local failure pattern analysis revealed further potential CIRT specific clinical benefits and potential pitfalls with regard to image-guidance and biological dose-optimization. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02093-4. BioMed Central 2022-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9264522/ /pubmed/35804448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02093-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Held, Thomas Tessonnier, Thomas Franke, Henrik Regnery, Sebastian Bauer, Lukas Weusthof, Katharina Harrabi, Semi Herfarth, Klaus Mairani, Andrea Debus, Jürgen Adeberg, Sebastian Ways to unravel the clinical potential of carbon ions for head and neck cancer reirradiation: dosimetric comparison and local failure pattern analysis as part of the prospective randomized CARE trial |
title | Ways to unravel the clinical potential of carbon ions for head and neck cancer reirradiation: dosimetric comparison and local failure pattern analysis as part of the prospective randomized CARE trial |
title_full | Ways to unravel the clinical potential of carbon ions for head and neck cancer reirradiation: dosimetric comparison and local failure pattern analysis as part of the prospective randomized CARE trial |
title_fullStr | Ways to unravel the clinical potential of carbon ions for head and neck cancer reirradiation: dosimetric comparison and local failure pattern analysis as part of the prospective randomized CARE trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Ways to unravel the clinical potential of carbon ions for head and neck cancer reirradiation: dosimetric comparison and local failure pattern analysis as part of the prospective randomized CARE trial |
title_short | Ways to unravel the clinical potential of carbon ions for head and neck cancer reirradiation: dosimetric comparison and local failure pattern analysis as part of the prospective randomized CARE trial |
title_sort | ways to unravel the clinical potential of carbon ions for head and neck cancer reirradiation: dosimetric comparison and local failure pattern analysis as part of the prospective randomized care trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02093-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heldthomas waystounraveltheclinicalpotentialofcarbonionsforheadandneckcancerreirradiationdosimetriccomparisonandlocalfailurepatternanalysisaspartoftheprospectiverandomizedcaretrial AT tessonnierthomas waystounraveltheclinicalpotentialofcarbonionsforheadandneckcancerreirradiationdosimetriccomparisonandlocalfailurepatternanalysisaspartoftheprospectiverandomizedcaretrial AT frankehenrik waystounraveltheclinicalpotentialofcarbonionsforheadandneckcancerreirradiationdosimetriccomparisonandlocalfailurepatternanalysisaspartoftheprospectiverandomizedcaretrial AT regnerysebastian waystounraveltheclinicalpotentialofcarbonionsforheadandneckcancerreirradiationdosimetriccomparisonandlocalfailurepatternanalysisaspartoftheprospectiverandomizedcaretrial AT bauerlukas waystounraveltheclinicalpotentialofcarbonionsforheadandneckcancerreirradiationdosimetriccomparisonandlocalfailurepatternanalysisaspartoftheprospectiverandomizedcaretrial AT weusthofkatharina waystounraveltheclinicalpotentialofcarbonionsforheadandneckcancerreirradiationdosimetriccomparisonandlocalfailurepatternanalysisaspartoftheprospectiverandomizedcaretrial AT harrabisemi waystounraveltheclinicalpotentialofcarbonionsforheadandneckcancerreirradiationdosimetriccomparisonandlocalfailurepatternanalysisaspartoftheprospectiverandomizedcaretrial AT herfarthklaus waystounraveltheclinicalpotentialofcarbonionsforheadandneckcancerreirradiationdosimetriccomparisonandlocalfailurepatternanalysisaspartoftheprospectiverandomizedcaretrial AT mairaniandrea waystounraveltheclinicalpotentialofcarbonionsforheadandneckcancerreirradiationdosimetriccomparisonandlocalfailurepatternanalysisaspartoftheprospectiverandomizedcaretrial AT debusjurgen waystounraveltheclinicalpotentialofcarbonionsforheadandneckcancerreirradiationdosimetriccomparisonandlocalfailurepatternanalysisaspartoftheprospectiverandomizedcaretrial AT adebergsebastian waystounraveltheclinicalpotentialofcarbonionsforheadandneckcancerreirradiationdosimetriccomparisonandlocalfailurepatternanalysisaspartoftheprospectiverandomizedcaretrial |