Cargando…
Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CSILS): study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: In most previous studies, single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for colorectal cancer (CRC) was feasible and safe in the short term. However, long-term oncologic outcomes remain uncertain, as only a few studies contained long-term survival data. SILS for CRC is still in the early s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35799145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09821-9 |
_version_ | 1784742991640920064 |
---|---|
author | Song, Zijia Liu, Kun Zhang, Tao Wang, Bingshun Shi, Yiqing Jiang, Yimei Wang, Changgang Chen, Xianze Ji, Xiaopin Zhao, Ren |
author_facet | Song, Zijia Liu, Kun Zhang, Tao Wang, Bingshun Shi, Yiqing Jiang, Yimei Wang, Changgang Chen, Xianze Ji, Xiaopin Zhao, Ren |
author_sort | Song, Zijia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In most previous studies, single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for colorectal cancer (CRC) was feasible and safe in the short term. However, long-term oncologic outcomes remain uncertain, as only a few studies contained long-term survival data. SILS for CRC is still in the early stages of research. Further studies, particularly large-scale, prospective randomized controlled trials, are necessary to assess the value of SILS for CRC. METHODS: This study is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, noninferiority, parallel-group randomized controlled trial that investigates the long-term oncologic outcomes of SILS compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for CRC. A total of 710 eligible patients will be randomly assigned to the SILS group or the CLS group at a 1:1 ratio using a central, dynamic, and stratified block randomization method. Patients with ages ranging from 18 to 85 years old, of both sexes, with CRC above the peritoneal reflection diagnosed as cT1-4aN0-2M0 and a tumour size no larger than 5 cm will be considered for the study. The primary endpoint is 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints include: intraoperative outcomes, postoperative recovery, postoperative pain assessment, pathological outcomes, early morbidity and mortality rate, cosmetic effects, quality of life, 3-year overall survival (OS), incidence of incisional hernia, 5-year DFS and 5-year OS. The first two follow-up visits will be scheduled at one month and three months postoperatively, then every three months for the first two years and every six months for the next three years. DISCUSSION: Currently, no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been designed to investigate the long-term oncologic outcomes of SILS for CRC. This study is expected to provide clinical evidence of the oncologic outcomes of SILS compared to CLS for CRC to promote its widespread use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT 04527861 (registered on August 27, 2020). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9264567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92645672022-07-09 Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CSILS): study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial Song, Zijia Liu, Kun Zhang, Tao Wang, Bingshun Shi, Yiqing Jiang, Yimei Wang, Changgang Chen, Xianze Ji, Xiaopin Zhao, Ren BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In most previous studies, single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for colorectal cancer (CRC) was feasible and safe in the short term. However, long-term oncologic outcomes remain uncertain, as only a few studies contained long-term survival data. SILS for CRC is still in the early stages of research. Further studies, particularly large-scale, prospective randomized controlled trials, are necessary to assess the value of SILS for CRC. METHODS: This study is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, noninferiority, parallel-group randomized controlled trial that investigates the long-term oncologic outcomes of SILS compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for CRC. A total of 710 eligible patients will be randomly assigned to the SILS group or the CLS group at a 1:1 ratio using a central, dynamic, and stratified block randomization method. Patients with ages ranging from 18 to 85 years old, of both sexes, with CRC above the peritoneal reflection diagnosed as cT1-4aN0-2M0 and a tumour size no larger than 5 cm will be considered for the study. The primary endpoint is 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints include: intraoperative outcomes, postoperative recovery, postoperative pain assessment, pathological outcomes, early morbidity and mortality rate, cosmetic effects, quality of life, 3-year overall survival (OS), incidence of incisional hernia, 5-year DFS and 5-year OS. The first two follow-up visits will be scheduled at one month and three months postoperatively, then every three months for the first two years and every six months for the next three years. DISCUSSION: Currently, no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been designed to investigate the long-term oncologic outcomes of SILS for CRC. This study is expected to provide clinical evidence of the oncologic outcomes of SILS compared to CLS for CRC to promote its widespread use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT 04527861 (registered on August 27, 2020). BioMed Central 2022-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9264567/ /pubmed/35799145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09821-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Song, Zijia Liu, Kun Zhang, Tao Wang, Bingshun Shi, Yiqing Jiang, Yimei Wang, Changgang Chen, Xianze Ji, Xiaopin Zhao, Ren Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CSILS): study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial |
title | Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CSILS): study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CSILS): study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CSILS): study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CSILS): study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CSILS): study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (csils): study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35799145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09821-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songzijia oncologicoutcomesofsingleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancercsilsstudyprotocolforamulticentreprospectiveopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liukun oncologicoutcomesofsingleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancercsilsstudyprotocolforamulticentreprospectiveopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhangtao oncologicoutcomesofsingleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancercsilsstudyprotocolforamulticentreprospectiveopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangbingshun oncologicoutcomesofsingleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancercsilsstudyprotocolforamulticentreprospectiveopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shiyiqing oncologicoutcomesofsingleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancercsilsstudyprotocolforamulticentreprospectiveopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jiangyimei oncologicoutcomesofsingleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancercsilsstudyprotocolforamulticentreprospectiveopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangchanggang oncologicoutcomesofsingleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancercsilsstudyprotocolforamulticentreprospectiveopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenxianze oncologicoutcomesofsingleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancercsilsstudyprotocolforamulticentreprospectiveopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jixiaopin oncologicoutcomesofsingleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancercsilsstudyprotocolforamulticentreprospectiveopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhaoren oncologicoutcomesofsingleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancercsilsstudyprotocolforamulticentreprospectiveopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial |