Cargando…
The impact of resistance exercise range of motion on the magnitude of upper-body post-activation performance enhancement
BACKGROUND: Various studies have used different exercise protocols as post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) stimulus; however, little attention has been given to the effects of exercise range of motion on the PAPE effect and subsequent performance enhancement. This study aimed to compare th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35799185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00519-w |
_version_ | 1784743007405211648 |
---|---|
author | Krzysztofik, Michał Trybulski, Robert Trąbka, Bartosz Perenc, Dawid Łuszcz, Konrad Zajac, Adam Alexe, Dan Iulian Dobrescu, Tatiana Moraru, Cristina Elena |
author_facet | Krzysztofik, Michał Trybulski, Robert Trąbka, Bartosz Perenc, Dawid Łuszcz, Konrad Zajac, Adam Alexe, Dan Iulian Dobrescu, Tatiana Moraru, Cristina Elena |
author_sort | Krzysztofik, Michał |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Various studies have used different exercise protocols as post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) stimulus; however, little attention has been given to the effects of exercise range of motion on the PAPE effect and subsequent performance enhancement. This study aimed to compare the PAPE responses induced by the bench press performed with different ranges of motion on subsequent bench press throw performance. METHODS: Ten resistance-trained males (age: 26 ± 3 years; body mass: 93.2 ± 9.4 kg; height: 181 ± 6 cm; experience in resistance training: 6.3 ± 2.4 years; relative bench press one-repetition maximum (1RM) 1.54 ± 0.2 kg/body mass) performed four experimental sessions consisting of a single set of the bench press at 80%1RM until mean barbell velocity dropped by 10% as the conditioning activity (CA) with a (1) standard, (2) cambered, (3) and reversed cambered barbell or a control condition in which the participants did not perform any CA. To assess the PAPE effect, single-sets of 2 repetitions of the bench press throw at 30%1RM were performed before and after the CA at the following time points: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 min. RESULTS: The two-way ANOVA (4 conditions × 2time points) showed a significant interaction for peak power (p < 0.001; η(2) = 0.556) and peak velocity (p = 0.001; η(2) = 0.457). The standard barbell bench press CA led to the greatest performance enhancement in peak power (p = 0.001; ES = 0.54) and in peak velocity (p = 0.002; ES = 0.71) within the examined conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the range of motion of the CA has a significant impact on the magnitude of the PAPE response, and the greatest effect can be reached when the range of motion of the CA and the subsequent explosive task is similar. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9264649 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92646492022-07-09 The impact of resistance exercise range of motion on the magnitude of upper-body post-activation performance enhancement Krzysztofik, Michał Trybulski, Robert Trąbka, Bartosz Perenc, Dawid Łuszcz, Konrad Zajac, Adam Alexe, Dan Iulian Dobrescu, Tatiana Moraru, Cristina Elena BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Various studies have used different exercise protocols as post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) stimulus; however, little attention has been given to the effects of exercise range of motion on the PAPE effect and subsequent performance enhancement. This study aimed to compare the PAPE responses induced by the bench press performed with different ranges of motion on subsequent bench press throw performance. METHODS: Ten resistance-trained males (age: 26 ± 3 years; body mass: 93.2 ± 9.4 kg; height: 181 ± 6 cm; experience in resistance training: 6.3 ± 2.4 years; relative bench press one-repetition maximum (1RM) 1.54 ± 0.2 kg/body mass) performed four experimental sessions consisting of a single set of the bench press at 80%1RM until mean barbell velocity dropped by 10% as the conditioning activity (CA) with a (1) standard, (2) cambered, (3) and reversed cambered barbell or a control condition in which the participants did not perform any CA. To assess the PAPE effect, single-sets of 2 repetitions of the bench press throw at 30%1RM were performed before and after the CA at the following time points: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 min. RESULTS: The two-way ANOVA (4 conditions × 2time points) showed a significant interaction for peak power (p < 0.001; η(2) = 0.556) and peak velocity (p = 0.001; η(2) = 0.457). The standard barbell bench press CA led to the greatest performance enhancement in peak power (p = 0.001; ES = 0.54) and in peak velocity (p = 0.002; ES = 0.71) within the examined conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the range of motion of the CA has a significant impact on the magnitude of the PAPE response, and the greatest effect can be reached when the range of motion of the CA and the subsequent explosive task is similar. BioMed Central 2022-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9264649/ /pubmed/35799185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00519-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Krzysztofik, Michał Trybulski, Robert Trąbka, Bartosz Perenc, Dawid Łuszcz, Konrad Zajac, Adam Alexe, Dan Iulian Dobrescu, Tatiana Moraru, Cristina Elena The impact of resistance exercise range of motion on the magnitude of upper-body post-activation performance enhancement |
title | The impact of resistance exercise range of motion on the magnitude of upper-body post-activation performance enhancement |
title_full | The impact of resistance exercise range of motion on the magnitude of upper-body post-activation performance enhancement |
title_fullStr | The impact of resistance exercise range of motion on the magnitude of upper-body post-activation performance enhancement |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of resistance exercise range of motion on the magnitude of upper-body post-activation performance enhancement |
title_short | The impact of resistance exercise range of motion on the magnitude of upper-body post-activation performance enhancement |
title_sort | impact of resistance exercise range of motion on the magnitude of upper-body post-activation performance enhancement |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35799185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00519-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krzysztofikmichał theimpactofresistanceexerciserangeofmotiononthemagnitudeofupperbodypostactivationperformanceenhancement AT trybulskirobert theimpactofresistanceexerciserangeofmotiononthemagnitudeofupperbodypostactivationperformanceenhancement AT trabkabartosz theimpactofresistanceexerciserangeofmotiononthemagnitudeofupperbodypostactivationperformanceenhancement AT perencdawid theimpactofresistanceexerciserangeofmotiononthemagnitudeofupperbodypostactivationperformanceenhancement AT łuszczkonrad theimpactofresistanceexerciserangeofmotiononthemagnitudeofupperbodypostactivationperformanceenhancement AT zajacadam theimpactofresistanceexerciserangeofmotiononthemagnitudeofupperbodypostactivationperformanceenhancement AT alexedaniulian theimpactofresistanceexerciserangeofmotiononthemagnitudeofupperbodypostactivationperformanceenhancement AT dobrescutatiana theimpactofresistanceexerciserangeofmotiononthemagnitudeofupperbodypostactivationperformanceenhancement AT morarucristinaelena theimpactofresistanceexerciserangeofmotiononthemagnitudeofupperbodypostactivationperformanceenhancement AT krzysztofikmichał impactofresistanceexerciserangeofmotiononthemagnitudeofupperbodypostactivationperformanceenhancement AT trybulskirobert impactofresistanceexerciserangeofmotiononthemagnitudeofupperbodypostactivationperformanceenhancement AT trabkabartosz impactofresistanceexerciserangeofmotiononthemagnitudeofupperbodypostactivationperformanceenhancement AT perencdawid impactofresistanceexerciserangeofmotiononthemagnitudeofupperbodypostactivationperformanceenhancement AT łuszczkonrad impactofresistanceexerciserangeofmotiononthemagnitudeofupperbodypostactivationperformanceenhancement AT zajacadam impactofresistanceexerciserangeofmotiononthemagnitudeofupperbodypostactivationperformanceenhancement AT alexedaniulian impactofresistanceexerciserangeofmotiononthemagnitudeofupperbodypostactivationperformanceenhancement AT dobrescutatiana impactofresistanceexerciserangeofmotiononthemagnitudeofupperbodypostactivationperformanceenhancement AT morarucristinaelena impactofresistanceexerciserangeofmotiononthemagnitudeofupperbodypostactivationperformanceenhancement |