Cargando…

Non-Operative Management of Patients with Rectal Cancer: Lessons Learnt from the OPRA Trial

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The management of rectal cancer has become increasingly more complex. Over the recent year, the use of chemotherapy and radiation before surgical intervention has been accepted as a new standard. As a consequence, between a third and half of the patients undergoing upfront therapy ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goffredo, Paolo, Quezada-Diaz, Felipe F., Garcia-Aguilar, Julio, Smith, J. Joshua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804975
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14133204
_version_ 1784743040799211520
author Goffredo, Paolo
Quezada-Diaz, Felipe F.
Garcia-Aguilar, Julio
Smith, J. Joshua
author_facet Goffredo, Paolo
Quezada-Diaz, Felipe F.
Garcia-Aguilar, Julio
Smith, J. Joshua
author_sort Goffredo, Paolo
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The management of rectal cancer has become increasingly more complex. Over the recent year, the use of chemotherapy and radiation before surgical intervention has been accepted as a new standard. As a consequence, between a third and half of the patients undergoing upfront therapy experience a clinical complete response with no residual rectal tumor remaining in the bowel lumen. These patients could potentially avoid the risks of surgery and undergo a close surveillance protocol, known as watch and wait. However, the identification of ideal candidates for this strategy remains challenging due to the lack of objective criteria. Ongoing studies are investigating optimal treatment algorithms to further expand the indications for watch and wait. ABSTRACT: Over the past decade, the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has progressively become more complex. The introduction of total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) has increased the rates of both clinical and pathological complete response, resulting in excellent long-term oncological outcomes. As a result, non-operative management (NOM) of LARC patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy has gained acceptance as a potential treatment option in selected cases. NOM is based on replacement of surgical resection with safe and active surveillance. However, the identification of appropriate candidates for a NOM strategy without compromising oncologic safety is currently challenging due to the lack of an objective standardization. NOM should be part of the treatment plan discussion with LARC patients, considering the increasing rates of cCR, patient preference, quality of life, expectations, and the potential avoidance of surgical morbidity. The recently published OPRA trial showed that organ preservation is achievable in half of rectal cancer patients treated with TNT, and that chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy may an appropriate strategy to maximize cCR rates. Ongoing trials are investigating optimal algorithms of TNT delivery to further expand the pool of patients who may benefit from NOM of LARC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9264788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92647882022-07-09 Non-Operative Management of Patients with Rectal Cancer: Lessons Learnt from the OPRA Trial Goffredo, Paolo Quezada-Diaz, Felipe F. Garcia-Aguilar, Julio Smith, J. Joshua Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: The management of rectal cancer has become increasingly more complex. Over the recent year, the use of chemotherapy and radiation before surgical intervention has been accepted as a new standard. As a consequence, between a third and half of the patients undergoing upfront therapy experience a clinical complete response with no residual rectal tumor remaining in the bowel lumen. These patients could potentially avoid the risks of surgery and undergo a close surveillance protocol, known as watch and wait. However, the identification of ideal candidates for this strategy remains challenging due to the lack of objective criteria. Ongoing studies are investigating optimal treatment algorithms to further expand the indications for watch and wait. ABSTRACT: Over the past decade, the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has progressively become more complex. The introduction of total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) has increased the rates of both clinical and pathological complete response, resulting in excellent long-term oncological outcomes. As a result, non-operative management (NOM) of LARC patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy has gained acceptance as a potential treatment option in selected cases. NOM is based on replacement of surgical resection with safe and active surveillance. However, the identification of appropriate candidates for a NOM strategy without compromising oncologic safety is currently challenging due to the lack of an objective standardization. NOM should be part of the treatment plan discussion with LARC patients, considering the increasing rates of cCR, patient preference, quality of life, expectations, and the potential avoidance of surgical morbidity. The recently published OPRA trial showed that organ preservation is achievable in half of rectal cancer patients treated with TNT, and that chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy may an appropriate strategy to maximize cCR rates. Ongoing trials are investigating optimal algorithms of TNT delivery to further expand the pool of patients who may benefit from NOM of LARC. MDPI 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9264788/ /pubmed/35804975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14133204 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Goffredo, Paolo
Quezada-Diaz, Felipe F.
Garcia-Aguilar, Julio
Smith, J. Joshua
Non-Operative Management of Patients with Rectal Cancer: Lessons Learnt from the OPRA Trial
title Non-Operative Management of Patients with Rectal Cancer: Lessons Learnt from the OPRA Trial
title_full Non-Operative Management of Patients with Rectal Cancer: Lessons Learnt from the OPRA Trial
title_fullStr Non-Operative Management of Patients with Rectal Cancer: Lessons Learnt from the OPRA Trial
title_full_unstemmed Non-Operative Management of Patients with Rectal Cancer: Lessons Learnt from the OPRA Trial
title_short Non-Operative Management of Patients with Rectal Cancer: Lessons Learnt from the OPRA Trial
title_sort non-operative management of patients with rectal cancer: lessons learnt from the opra trial
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804975
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14133204
work_keys_str_mv AT goffredopaolo nonoperativemanagementofpatientswithrectalcancerlessonslearntfromtheopratrial
AT quezadadiazfelipef nonoperativemanagementofpatientswithrectalcancerlessonslearntfromtheopratrial
AT garciaaguilarjulio nonoperativemanagementofpatientswithrectalcancerlessonslearntfromtheopratrial
AT smithjjoshua nonoperativemanagementofpatientswithrectalcancerlessonslearntfromtheopratrial