Cargando…

Proposal of New Safety Limits for In Vivo Experiments of Magnetic Hyperthermia Antitumor Therapy

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Magnetic hyperthermia is a promising therapy for the treatment of certain types of tumors. However, it is not clear what the maximum limit of the magnetic field to which the organism can be subjected without severe and/or irreversible pathophysiological consequences is. This study ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herrero de la Parte, Borja, Rodrigo, Irati, Gutiérrez-Basoa, Jon, Iturrizaga Correcher, Sira, Mar Medina, Carmen, Echevarría-Uraga, Jose Javier, Garcia, Jose Angel, Plazaola, Fernando, García-Alonso, Ignacio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9265033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804855
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14133084
Descripción
Sumario:SIMPLE SUMMARY: Magnetic hyperthermia is a promising therapy for the treatment of certain types of tumors. However, it is not clear what the maximum limit of the magnetic field to which the organism can be subjected without severe and/or irreversible pathophysiological consequences is. This study aims to study the alterations at the physiological level that may occur after exposure to different combinations of frequency and intensity of the applied alternating magnetic field. Understanding the response to alternating magnetic field exposure will allow us to apply this type of antitumor treatment in a safer way for the patient, while achieving an optimal therapeutic result. ABSTRACT: Background: Lately, major advances in crucial aspects of magnetic hyperthermia (MH) therapy have been made (nanoparticle synthesis, biosafety, etc.). However, there is one key point still lacking improvement: the magnetic field-frequency product (H × f = 4.85 × 10(8) Am(−1)s(−1)) proposed by Atkinson–Brezovich as a limit for MH therapies. Herein, we analyze both local and systemic physiological effects of overpassing this limit. Methods: Different combinations of field frequency and intensity exceeding the Atkinson–Brezovich limit (591–920 kHz, and 10.3–18 kA/m) have been applied for 21 min to WAG/RijHsd male rats, randomly distributed to groups of 12 animals; half of them were sacrificed after 12 h, and the others 10 days later. Biochemical serum analyses were performed to assess the general, hepatic, renal and/or pancreatic function. Results: MH raised liver temperature to 42.8 ± 0.4 °C. Although in five of the groups the exposure was relatively well tolerated, in the two of highest frequency (928 kHz) and intensity (18 kA/m), more than 50% of the animals died. A striking elevation in liver and systemic markers was observed after 12 h in the surviving animals, independently of the frequency and intensity used. Ten days later, liver markers were almost recovered in all of the animals. However, in those groups exposed to 591 kHz and 16 kA/m, and 700 kHz and 13.7 kA/m systemic markers remained altered. Conclusions: Exceeding the Atkinson–Brezovich limit up to 9.59 × 10(9) Am(−1)s(−1) seems to be safe, though further research is needed to understand the impact of intensity and/or frequency on physiological conditions following MH.