Cargando…
The Impact of COVID-19 Zoo Closures on Behavioural and Physiological Parameters of Welfare in Primates
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Zoo visitors can have a positive, negative, or neutral impact on animals. Primates are cognitively very advanced and their interactions with human visitors are complex. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a prolonged absence of visitors in zoos. This enabled an opportunity to compare how pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9265073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804521 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12131622 |
_version_ | 1784743120723771392 |
---|---|
author | Williams, Ellen Carter, Anne Rendle, Jessica Fontani, Sara Walsh, Naomi Davies Armstrong, Sarah Hickman, Sarah Vaglio, Stefano Ward, Samantha J. |
author_facet | Williams, Ellen Carter, Anne Rendle, Jessica Fontani, Sara Walsh, Naomi Davies Armstrong, Sarah Hickman, Sarah Vaglio, Stefano Ward, Samantha J. |
author_sort | Williams, Ellen |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Zoo visitors can have a positive, negative, or neutral impact on animals. Primates are cognitively very advanced and their interactions with human visitors are complex. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a prolonged absence of visitors in zoos. This enabled an opportunity to compare how primates behaved when the zoo was open to visitors as opposed to when it was closed. We studied four primate species housed in the UK: bonobos, chimpanzees, and western lowland gorillas held at Twycross Zoo and olive baboons held at Knowsley Safari. Bonobos and gorillas spent less time alone when facilities were open to the public. Gorillas also spent less time resting when the facility was open to the public. Chimpanzees ate more and engaged more with enrichment when the zoo was open to the public. Olive baboons performed less sexual and dominance behaviour and approached visitor cars more frequently when the safari park was opened to the public than the ranger’s vehicle during closure periods. The results suggest that the zoo closures had variable impacts on the primates and that the closure periods were neither “negative” or “positive” for all of the studied species. There are likely to be differences between individuals due to prior experiences. We recommend that future work seeks to understand the impact individual differences and animal environments have on animals’ experiences with visitors. ABSTRACT: Primates are some of the most cognitively advanced species held in zoos, and their interactions with visitors are complex. The COVID-19 pandemic provided a unique opportunity to understand the impact of zoo visitors on animals, in comparison to “empty zoos”. This study sought to understand the impact of facility closures and subsequent reopenings on behavioural and physiological parameters of welfare in four primate species housed in the UK: bonobos (Pan paniscus) (n = 8), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) (n = 11), and western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) (n = 6) held at Twycross Zoo (TZ); and olive baboons (Papio anubis) (n = 192) held at Knowsley Safari (KS). Behavioural data were collected from April–September 2020 (KS) and November 2020–January 2021 (TZ). Faecal samples were collected during morning checks from October–November (TZ) and July–November 2020 (KS). Faecal glucocorticoid metabolites (FGMs) were measured using ELISA kits. Statistical analysis for behavioural observations was undertaken using general linear models. Enclosure usage was assessed using t-tests and Mann–Whitney U-tests as appropriate. Bonobos and gorillas spent less time alone when facilities were open to the public (p = 0.004, p = 0.02 respectively). Gorillas spent less time resting when the facility was open to the public (p = 0.04), and chimpanzees engaged in more feeding (p = 0.02) and engagement with enrichment (p = 0.03) when the zoo was open to the public than when it was closed. Olive baboons performed less sexual and dominance behaviour and approached visitor cars more frequently when the safari park was opened to the public than they did the ranger’s vehicle during closure periods. There were no significant changes in physiological parameters for any of the study species. The results suggest variable impacts of the zoo closures on zoo-housed primates. We recommend future work that seeks to understand the impact of individual-level differences on “visitor effects” and that differences between animal experiences in zoos and safari parks are further explored in a range of species. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9265073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92650732022-07-09 The Impact of COVID-19 Zoo Closures on Behavioural and Physiological Parameters of Welfare in Primates Williams, Ellen Carter, Anne Rendle, Jessica Fontani, Sara Walsh, Naomi Davies Armstrong, Sarah Hickman, Sarah Vaglio, Stefano Ward, Samantha J. Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Zoo visitors can have a positive, negative, or neutral impact on animals. Primates are cognitively very advanced and their interactions with human visitors are complex. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a prolonged absence of visitors in zoos. This enabled an opportunity to compare how primates behaved when the zoo was open to visitors as opposed to when it was closed. We studied four primate species housed in the UK: bonobos, chimpanzees, and western lowland gorillas held at Twycross Zoo and olive baboons held at Knowsley Safari. Bonobos and gorillas spent less time alone when facilities were open to the public. Gorillas also spent less time resting when the facility was open to the public. Chimpanzees ate more and engaged more with enrichment when the zoo was open to the public. Olive baboons performed less sexual and dominance behaviour and approached visitor cars more frequently when the safari park was opened to the public than the ranger’s vehicle during closure periods. The results suggest that the zoo closures had variable impacts on the primates and that the closure periods were neither “negative” or “positive” for all of the studied species. There are likely to be differences between individuals due to prior experiences. We recommend that future work seeks to understand the impact individual differences and animal environments have on animals’ experiences with visitors. ABSTRACT: Primates are some of the most cognitively advanced species held in zoos, and their interactions with visitors are complex. The COVID-19 pandemic provided a unique opportunity to understand the impact of zoo visitors on animals, in comparison to “empty zoos”. This study sought to understand the impact of facility closures and subsequent reopenings on behavioural and physiological parameters of welfare in four primate species housed in the UK: bonobos (Pan paniscus) (n = 8), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) (n = 11), and western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) (n = 6) held at Twycross Zoo (TZ); and olive baboons (Papio anubis) (n = 192) held at Knowsley Safari (KS). Behavioural data were collected from April–September 2020 (KS) and November 2020–January 2021 (TZ). Faecal samples were collected during morning checks from October–November (TZ) and July–November 2020 (KS). Faecal glucocorticoid metabolites (FGMs) were measured using ELISA kits. Statistical analysis for behavioural observations was undertaken using general linear models. Enclosure usage was assessed using t-tests and Mann–Whitney U-tests as appropriate. Bonobos and gorillas spent less time alone when facilities were open to the public (p = 0.004, p = 0.02 respectively). Gorillas spent less time resting when the facility was open to the public (p = 0.04), and chimpanzees engaged in more feeding (p = 0.02) and engagement with enrichment (p = 0.03) when the zoo was open to the public than when it was closed. Olive baboons performed less sexual and dominance behaviour and approached visitor cars more frequently when the safari park was opened to the public than they did the ranger’s vehicle during closure periods. There were no significant changes in physiological parameters for any of the study species. The results suggest variable impacts of the zoo closures on zoo-housed primates. We recommend future work that seeks to understand the impact of individual-level differences on “visitor effects” and that differences between animal experiences in zoos and safari parks are further explored in a range of species. MDPI 2022-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9265073/ /pubmed/35804521 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12131622 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Williams, Ellen Carter, Anne Rendle, Jessica Fontani, Sara Walsh, Naomi Davies Armstrong, Sarah Hickman, Sarah Vaglio, Stefano Ward, Samantha J. The Impact of COVID-19 Zoo Closures on Behavioural and Physiological Parameters of Welfare in Primates |
title | The Impact of COVID-19 Zoo Closures on Behavioural and Physiological Parameters of Welfare in Primates |
title_full | The Impact of COVID-19 Zoo Closures on Behavioural and Physiological Parameters of Welfare in Primates |
title_fullStr | The Impact of COVID-19 Zoo Closures on Behavioural and Physiological Parameters of Welfare in Primates |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of COVID-19 Zoo Closures on Behavioural and Physiological Parameters of Welfare in Primates |
title_short | The Impact of COVID-19 Zoo Closures on Behavioural and Physiological Parameters of Welfare in Primates |
title_sort | impact of covid-19 zoo closures on behavioural and physiological parameters of welfare in primates |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9265073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804521 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12131622 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT williamsellen theimpactofcovid19zooclosuresonbehaviouralandphysiologicalparametersofwelfareinprimates AT carteranne theimpactofcovid19zooclosuresonbehaviouralandphysiologicalparametersofwelfareinprimates AT rendlejessica theimpactofcovid19zooclosuresonbehaviouralandphysiologicalparametersofwelfareinprimates AT fontanisara theimpactofcovid19zooclosuresonbehaviouralandphysiologicalparametersofwelfareinprimates AT walshnaomidavies theimpactofcovid19zooclosuresonbehaviouralandphysiologicalparametersofwelfareinprimates AT armstrongsarah theimpactofcovid19zooclosuresonbehaviouralandphysiologicalparametersofwelfareinprimates AT hickmansarah theimpactofcovid19zooclosuresonbehaviouralandphysiologicalparametersofwelfareinprimates AT vagliostefano theimpactofcovid19zooclosuresonbehaviouralandphysiologicalparametersofwelfareinprimates AT wardsamanthaj theimpactofcovid19zooclosuresonbehaviouralandphysiologicalparametersofwelfareinprimates AT williamsellen impactofcovid19zooclosuresonbehaviouralandphysiologicalparametersofwelfareinprimates AT carteranne impactofcovid19zooclosuresonbehaviouralandphysiologicalparametersofwelfareinprimates AT rendlejessica impactofcovid19zooclosuresonbehaviouralandphysiologicalparametersofwelfareinprimates AT fontanisara impactofcovid19zooclosuresonbehaviouralandphysiologicalparametersofwelfareinprimates AT walshnaomidavies impactofcovid19zooclosuresonbehaviouralandphysiologicalparametersofwelfareinprimates AT armstrongsarah impactofcovid19zooclosuresonbehaviouralandphysiologicalparametersofwelfareinprimates AT hickmansarah impactofcovid19zooclosuresonbehaviouralandphysiologicalparametersofwelfareinprimates AT vagliostefano impactofcovid19zooclosuresonbehaviouralandphysiologicalparametersofwelfareinprimates AT wardsamanthaj impactofcovid19zooclosuresonbehaviouralandphysiologicalparametersofwelfareinprimates |