Cargando…

Determination of Critical Power Using Different Possible Approaches among Endurance Athletes: A Review

Critical power represents an important parameter of aerobic function and is the highest average effort that can be sustained for a period of time without fatigue. Critical power is determined mainly in the laboratory. Many different approaches have been applied in testing methods, and it is a diffic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lipková, Lucie, Kumstát, Michal, Struhár, Ivan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9265641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35805242
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137589
_version_ 1784743262445109248
author Lipková, Lucie
Kumstát, Michal
Struhár, Ivan
author_facet Lipková, Lucie
Kumstát, Michal
Struhár, Ivan
author_sort Lipková, Lucie
collection PubMed
description Critical power represents an important parameter of aerobic function and is the highest average effort that can be sustained for a period of time without fatigue. Critical power is determined mainly in the laboratory. Many different approaches have been applied in testing methods, and it is a difficult task to determine which testing protocol it the most suitable. This review aims to evaluate all possible tests on bicycle ergometers or bicycles used to estimate critical power and to compare them. A literature search was conducted in four databases (PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) published from 2012 to 2022 and followed the PRISMA guidelines to process the review. Twenty-one articles met the eligibility criteria: records with trained or experienced endurance athletes (adults > 18), bicycle ergometer, a description of the testing protocol, and comparison of the tests. We found that the most widely used tests were the 3-min all-out tests set in a linear mode and the traditional protocol time to exhaustion. Some other alternatives could have been used but were not as regular. To summarize, the testing methods offered two main approaches in the laboratory (time to exhaustion test andthe 3-min all-out test with different protocols) and approach in the field, which is not yet completely standardized.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9265641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92656412022-07-09 Determination of Critical Power Using Different Possible Approaches among Endurance Athletes: A Review Lipková, Lucie Kumstát, Michal Struhár, Ivan Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Critical power represents an important parameter of aerobic function and is the highest average effort that can be sustained for a period of time without fatigue. Critical power is determined mainly in the laboratory. Many different approaches have been applied in testing methods, and it is a difficult task to determine which testing protocol it the most suitable. This review aims to evaluate all possible tests on bicycle ergometers or bicycles used to estimate critical power and to compare them. A literature search was conducted in four databases (PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) published from 2012 to 2022 and followed the PRISMA guidelines to process the review. Twenty-one articles met the eligibility criteria: records with trained or experienced endurance athletes (adults > 18), bicycle ergometer, a description of the testing protocol, and comparison of the tests. We found that the most widely used tests were the 3-min all-out tests set in a linear mode and the traditional protocol time to exhaustion. Some other alternatives could have been used but were not as regular. To summarize, the testing methods offered two main approaches in the laboratory (time to exhaustion test andthe 3-min all-out test with different protocols) and approach in the field, which is not yet completely standardized. MDPI 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9265641/ /pubmed/35805242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137589 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Lipková, Lucie
Kumstát, Michal
Struhár, Ivan
Determination of Critical Power Using Different Possible Approaches among Endurance Athletes: A Review
title Determination of Critical Power Using Different Possible Approaches among Endurance Athletes: A Review
title_full Determination of Critical Power Using Different Possible Approaches among Endurance Athletes: A Review
title_fullStr Determination of Critical Power Using Different Possible Approaches among Endurance Athletes: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Determination of Critical Power Using Different Possible Approaches among Endurance Athletes: A Review
title_short Determination of Critical Power Using Different Possible Approaches among Endurance Athletes: A Review
title_sort determination of critical power using different possible approaches among endurance athletes: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9265641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35805242
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137589
work_keys_str_mv AT lipkovalucie determinationofcriticalpowerusingdifferentpossibleapproachesamongenduranceathletesareview
AT kumstatmichal determinationofcriticalpowerusingdifferentpossibleapproachesamongenduranceathletesareview
AT struharivan determinationofcriticalpowerusingdifferentpossibleapproachesamongenduranceathletesareview