Cargando…

Use of Thermoregulatory Models to Evaluate Heat Stress in Industrial Environments

Heat stress in many industrial workplaces imposes significant risk of injury to individuals. As a means of quantifying these risks, a comparison of four rationally developed thermoregulatory models was conducted. The health-risk prediction (HRP) model, the human thermal regulation model (HuTheReg),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yermakova, Irena I., Potter, Adam W., Raimundo, António M., Xu, Xiaojiang, Hancock, Jason W., Oliveira, A. Virgilio M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9265684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35805626
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137950
_version_ 1784743273817964544
author Yermakova, Irena I.
Potter, Adam W.
Raimundo, António M.
Xu, Xiaojiang
Hancock, Jason W.
Oliveira, A. Virgilio M.
author_facet Yermakova, Irena I.
Potter, Adam W.
Raimundo, António M.
Xu, Xiaojiang
Hancock, Jason W.
Oliveira, A. Virgilio M.
author_sort Yermakova, Irena I.
collection PubMed
description Heat stress in many industrial workplaces imposes significant risk of injury to individuals. As a means of quantifying these risks, a comparison of four rationally developed thermoregulatory models was conducted. The health-risk prediction (HRP) model, the human thermal regulation model (HuTheReg), the SCENARIO model, and the six-cylinder thermoregulatory model (SCTM) each used the same inputs for an individual, clothing, activity rates, and environment based on previously observed conditions within the Portuguese glass industry. An analysis of model correlations was conducted for predicted temperatures (°C) of brain (T(Brain)), skin (T(Skin)), core body (T(Core)), as well as sweat evaporation rate (ER; Watts). Close agreement was observed between each model (0.81–0.98). Predicted mean ± SD of active phases of exposure for both moderate (T(Brain) 37.8 ± 0.25, T(Skin) 36.7 ± 0.49, T(Core) 37.8 ± 0.45 °C, and ER 207.7 ± 60.4 W) and extreme heat (T(Brain) 39.1 ± 0.58, T(Skin), 38.6 ± 0.71, T(Core) 38.7 ± 0.65 °C, and ER 468.2 ± 80.2 W) were assessed. This analysis quantifies these heat-risk conditions and provides a platform for comparison of methods to more fully predict heat stress during exposures to hot environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9265684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92656842022-07-09 Use of Thermoregulatory Models to Evaluate Heat Stress in Industrial Environments Yermakova, Irena I. Potter, Adam W. Raimundo, António M. Xu, Xiaojiang Hancock, Jason W. Oliveira, A. Virgilio M. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Heat stress in many industrial workplaces imposes significant risk of injury to individuals. As a means of quantifying these risks, a comparison of four rationally developed thermoregulatory models was conducted. The health-risk prediction (HRP) model, the human thermal regulation model (HuTheReg), the SCENARIO model, and the six-cylinder thermoregulatory model (SCTM) each used the same inputs for an individual, clothing, activity rates, and environment based on previously observed conditions within the Portuguese glass industry. An analysis of model correlations was conducted for predicted temperatures (°C) of brain (T(Brain)), skin (T(Skin)), core body (T(Core)), as well as sweat evaporation rate (ER; Watts). Close agreement was observed between each model (0.81–0.98). Predicted mean ± SD of active phases of exposure for both moderate (T(Brain) 37.8 ± 0.25, T(Skin) 36.7 ± 0.49, T(Core) 37.8 ± 0.45 °C, and ER 207.7 ± 60.4 W) and extreme heat (T(Brain) 39.1 ± 0.58, T(Skin), 38.6 ± 0.71, T(Core) 38.7 ± 0.65 °C, and ER 468.2 ± 80.2 W) were assessed. This analysis quantifies these heat-risk conditions and provides a platform for comparison of methods to more fully predict heat stress during exposures to hot environments. MDPI 2022-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9265684/ /pubmed/35805626 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137950 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yermakova, Irena I.
Potter, Adam W.
Raimundo, António M.
Xu, Xiaojiang
Hancock, Jason W.
Oliveira, A. Virgilio M.
Use of Thermoregulatory Models to Evaluate Heat Stress in Industrial Environments
title Use of Thermoregulatory Models to Evaluate Heat Stress in Industrial Environments
title_full Use of Thermoregulatory Models to Evaluate Heat Stress in Industrial Environments
title_fullStr Use of Thermoregulatory Models to Evaluate Heat Stress in Industrial Environments
title_full_unstemmed Use of Thermoregulatory Models to Evaluate Heat Stress in Industrial Environments
title_short Use of Thermoregulatory Models to Evaluate Heat Stress in Industrial Environments
title_sort use of thermoregulatory models to evaluate heat stress in industrial environments
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9265684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35805626
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137950
work_keys_str_mv AT yermakovairenai useofthermoregulatorymodelstoevaluateheatstressinindustrialenvironments
AT potteradamw useofthermoregulatorymodelstoevaluateheatstressinindustrialenvironments
AT raimundoantoniom useofthermoregulatorymodelstoevaluateheatstressinindustrialenvironments
AT xuxiaojiang useofthermoregulatorymodelstoevaluateheatstressinindustrialenvironments
AT hancockjasonw useofthermoregulatorymodelstoevaluateheatstressinindustrialenvironments
AT oliveiraavirgiliom useofthermoregulatorymodelstoevaluateheatstressinindustrialenvironments