Cargando…

Ischemic Preconditioning with High and Low Pressure Enhances Maximum Strength and Modulates Heart Rate Variability

Background: The application of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) to resistance exercise has attracted some attention, owing to increases in muscle performance. However, there is still no consensus on the optimal occlusion pressure for this procedure. This study compared the acute effects of IPC with hi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Telles, Luiz Guilherme, Billaut, François, de Souza Ribeiro, Aline, Junqueira, Christian Geórgea, Leitão, Luís, Barreto, Ana Cristina, Panza, Patricia, Vianna, Jeferson Macedo, da Silva Novaes, Jefferson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9265721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35805313
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137655
_version_ 1784743283571818496
author Telles, Luiz Guilherme
Billaut, François
de Souza Ribeiro, Aline
Junqueira, Christian Geórgea
Leitão, Luís
Barreto, Ana Cristina
Panza, Patricia
Vianna, Jeferson Macedo
da Silva Novaes, Jefferson
author_facet Telles, Luiz Guilherme
Billaut, François
de Souza Ribeiro, Aline
Junqueira, Christian Geórgea
Leitão, Luís
Barreto, Ana Cristina
Panza, Patricia
Vianna, Jeferson Macedo
da Silva Novaes, Jefferson
author_sort Telles, Luiz Guilherme
collection PubMed
description Background: The application of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) to resistance exercise has attracted some attention, owing to increases in muscle performance. However, there is still no consensus on the optimal occlusion pressure for this procedure. This study compared the acute effects of IPC with high and low pressure of occlusion on upper and lower limb maximal strength and heart rate variability in recreationally trained individuals. Methods: Sixteen recreationally trained men (25.3 ± 1.7 years; 78.4 ± 6.2 kg; 176.9 ± 5.4 cm; 25.1 ± 1.5 m(2) kg(−1)) were thoroughly familiarized with one repetition maximum (1 RM) testing in the following exercises: bench press (BP), front latissimus pull-down (FLPD), and shoulder press (SP) for upper limbs, and leg press 45º (LP45), hack machine (HM), and Smith Squat (SS) for lower limbs. The 1 RM exercises were then randomly performed on three separate days: after a high pressure (220 mmHg, IPC(high)) and a low pressure (20 mmHg, IPC(low)) IPC protocol and after no intervention (control, CON). Heart rate variability was also measured at rest, during and after the entire IPC protocol, and after the exercises. Results: Maximal strength was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in both IPC(high) and IPC(low) compared with CON in all upper- and lower-limb exercises. There was no difference between the two experimental conditions. No significant differences were found in the comparison across the different experimental conditions for LF(nu), HF(nu), LF/HF ratio, and RMSSD(ms). Conclusions: IPC performed with both high and low pressures influenced heart rate variability, which may partly explain the maximal strength enhancement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9265721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92657212022-07-09 Ischemic Preconditioning with High and Low Pressure Enhances Maximum Strength and Modulates Heart Rate Variability Telles, Luiz Guilherme Billaut, François de Souza Ribeiro, Aline Junqueira, Christian Geórgea Leitão, Luís Barreto, Ana Cristina Panza, Patricia Vianna, Jeferson Macedo da Silva Novaes, Jefferson Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: The application of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) to resistance exercise has attracted some attention, owing to increases in muscle performance. However, there is still no consensus on the optimal occlusion pressure for this procedure. This study compared the acute effects of IPC with high and low pressure of occlusion on upper and lower limb maximal strength and heart rate variability in recreationally trained individuals. Methods: Sixteen recreationally trained men (25.3 ± 1.7 years; 78.4 ± 6.2 kg; 176.9 ± 5.4 cm; 25.1 ± 1.5 m(2) kg(−1)) were thoroughly familiarized with one repetition maximum (1 RM) testing in the following exercises: bench press (BP), front latissimus pull-down (FLPD), and shoulder press (SP) for upper limbs, and leg press 45º (LP45), hack machine (HM), and Smith Squat (SS) for lower limbs. The 1 RM exercises were then randomly performed on three separate days: after a high pressure (220 mmHg, IPC(high)) and a low pressure (20 mmHg, IPC(low)) IPC protocol and after no intervention (control, CON). Heart rate variability was also measured at rest, during and after the entire IPC protocol, and after the exercises. Results: Maximal strength was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in both IPC(high) and IPC(low) compared with CON in all upper- and lower-limb exercises. There was no difference between the two experimental conditions. No significant differences were found in the comparison across the different experimental conditions for LF(nu), HF(nu), LF/HF ratio, and RMSSD(ms). Conclusions: IPC performed with both high and low pressures influenced heart rate variability, which may partly explain the maximal strength enhancement. MDPI 2022-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9265721/ /pubmed/35805313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137655 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Telles, Luiz Guilherme
Billaut, François
de Souza Ribeiro, Aline
Junqueira, Christian Geórgea
Leitão, Luís
Barreto, Ana Cristina
Panza, Patricia
Vianna, Jeferson Macedo
da Silva Novaes, Jefferson
Ischemic Preconditioning with High and Low Pressure Enhances Maximum Strength and Modulates Heart Rate Variability
title Ischemic Preconditioning with High and Low Pressure Enhances Maximum Strength and Modulates Heart Rate Variability
title_full Ischemic Preconditioning with High and Low Pressure Enhances Maximum Strength and Modulates Heart Rate Variability
title_fullStr Ischemic Preconditioning with High and Low Pressure Enhances Maximum Strength and Modulates Heart Rate Variability
title_full_unstemmed Ischemic Preconditioning with High and Low Pressure Enhances Maximum Strength and Modulates Heart Rate Variability
title_short Ischemic Preconditioning with High and Low Pressure Enhances Maximum Strength and Modulates Heart Rate Variability
title_sort ischemic preconditioning with high and low pressure enhances maximum strength and modulates heart rate variability
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9265721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35805313
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137655
work_keys_str_mv AT tellesluizguilherme ischemicpreconditioningwithhighandlowpressureenhancesmaximumstrengthandmodulatesheartratevariability
AT billautfrancois ischemicpreconditioningwithhighandlowpressureenhancesmaximumstrengthandmodulatesheartratevariability
AT desouzaribeiroaline ischemicpreconditioningwithhighandlowpressureenhancesmaximumstrengthandmodulatesheartratevariability
AT junqueirachristiangeorgea ischemicpreconditioningwithhighandlowpressureenhancesmaximumstrengthandmodulatesheartratevariability
AT leitaoluis ischemicpreconditioningwithhighandlowpressureenhancesmaximumstrengthandmodulatesheartratevariability
AT barretoanacristina ischemicpreconditioningwithhighandlowpressureenhancesmaximumstrengthandmodulatesheartratevariability
AT panzapatricia ischemicpreconditioningwithhighandlowpressureenhancesmaximumstrengthandmodulatesheartratevariability
AT viannajefersonmacedo ischemicpreconditioningwithhighandlowpressureenhancesmaximumstrengthandmodulatesheartratevariability
AT dasilvanovaesjefferson ischemicpreconditioningwithhighandlowpressureenhancesmaximumstrengthandmodulatesheartratevariability