Cargando…

Comparison of Life Cycle Environmental Impact between Two Processes for Silver Separation from Copper Anode Slime

The cost of silver separation is lowered when ammonia and hydrazine hydrate are replaced with sodium thiosulfate and sodium dithionite in the process of extracting of metallic silver from copper anode slime. The overall environmental impact of two types of copper silver separation processes from ano...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zehong, Zhang, Wenbiao, Xia, Bing, Wang, Chunying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9265777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35805449
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137790
_version_ 1784743298116616192
author Li, Zehong
Zhang, Wenbiao
Xia, Bing
Wang, Chunying
author_facet Li, Zehong
Zhang, Wenbiao
Xia, Bing
Wang, Chunying
author_sort Li, Zehong
collection PubMed
description The cost of silver separation is lowered when ammonia and hydrazine hydrate are replaced with sodium thiosulfate and sodium dithionite in the process of extracting of metallic silver from copper anode slime. The overall environmental impact of two types of copper silver separation processes from anode slime has been analyzed\using the LCA method. Through the subdivision analysis, we found the raw materials or emission items that should be improved first. The following conclusions are drawn: (1) The life cycle environmental impact of the sodium thiosulfate process is much lower than the existing process; (2) The resource and environmental impacts of the sodium thiosulfate method are mainly in the fields of climate change, photochemical smog, and ionizing radiation, exceeding two-thirds of the impact on all of the resources and environment; (3) In terms of input and output items, the main impact of the new process on the resources and the environment is concentrated on the use of sodium hydroxide, accounting for 33.98% of the total equivalent, followed by sodium thiosulfate and sodium carbonate, respectively. These input–output items are the key fields that need attention in future technology improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9265777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92657772022-07-09 Comparison of Life Cycle Environmental Impact between Two Processes for Silver Separation from Copper Anode Slime Li, Zehong Zhang, Wenbiao Xia, Bing Wang, Chunying Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The cost of silver separation is lowered when ammonia and hydrazine hydrate are replaced with sodium thiosulfate and sodium dithionite in the process of extracting of metallic silver from copper anode slime. The overall environmental impact of two types of copper silver separation processes from anode slime has been analyzed\using the LCA method. Through the subdivision analysis, we found the raw materials or emission items that should be improved first. The following conclusions are drawn: (1) The life cycle environmental impact of the sodium thiosulfate process is much lower than the existing process; (2) The resource and environmental impacts of the sodium thiosulfate method are mainly in the fields of climate change, photochemical smog, and ionizing radiation, exceeding two-thirds of the impact on all of the resources and environment; (3) In terms of input and output items, the main impact of the new process on the resources and the environment is concentrated on the use of sodium hydroxide, accounting for 33.98% of the total equivalent, followed by sodium thiosulfate and sodium carbonate, respectively. These input–output items are the key fields that need attention in future technology improvement. MDPI 2022-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9265777/ /pubmed/35805449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137790 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Zehong
Zhang, Wenbiao
Xia, Bing
Wang, Chunying
Comparison of Life Cycle Environmental Impact between Two Processes for Silver Separation from Copper Anode Slime
title Comparison of Life Cycle Environmental Impact between Two Processes for Silver Separation from Copper Anode Slime
title_full Comparison of Life Cycle Environmental Impact between Two Processes for Silver Separation from Copper Anode Slime
title_fullStr Comparison of Life Cycle Environmental Impact between Two Processes for Silver Separation from Copper Anode Slime
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Life Cycle Environmental Impact between Two Processes for Silver Separation from Copper Anode Slime
title_short Comparison of Life Cycle Environmental Impact between Two Processes for Silver Separation from Copper Anode Slime
title_sort comparison of life cycle environmental impact between two processes for silver separation from copper anode slime
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9265777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35805449
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137790
work_keys_str_mv AT lizehong comparisonoflifecycleenvironmentalimpactbetweentwoprocessesforsilverseparationfromcopperanodeslime
AT zhangwenbiao comparisonoflifecycleenvironmentalimpactbetweentwoprocessesforsilverseparationfromcopperanodeslime
AT xiabing comparisonoflifecycleenvironmentalimpactbetweentwoprocessesforsilverseparationfromcopperanodeslime
AT wangchunying comparisonoflifecycleenvironmentalimpactbetweentwoprocessesforsilverseparationfromcopperanodeslime