Cargando…
Comparison of Life Cycle Environmental Impact between Two Processes for Silver Separation from Copper Anode Slime
The cost of silver separation is lowered when ammonia and hydrazine hydrate are replaced with sodium thiosulfate and sodium dithionite in the process of extracting of metallic silver from copper anode slime. The overall environmental impact of two types of copper silver separation processes from ano...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9265777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35805449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137790 |
_version_ | 1784743298116616192 |
---|---|
author | Li, Zehong Zhang, Wenbiao Xia, Bing Wang, Chunying |
author_facet | Li, Zehong Zhang, Wenbiao Xia, Bing Wang, Chunying |
author_sort | Li, Zehong |
collection | PubMed |
description | The cost of silver separation is lowered when ammonia and hydrazine hydrate are replaced with sodium thiosulfate and sodium dithionite in the process of extracting of metallic silver from copper anode slime. The overall environmental impact of two types of copper silver separation processes from anode slime has been analyzed\using the LCA method. Through the subdivision analysis, we found the raw materials or emission items that should be improved first. The following conclusions are drawn: (1) The life cycle environmental impact of the sodium thiosulfate process is much lower than the existing process; (2) The resource and environmental impacts of the sodium thiosulfate method are mainly in the fields of climate change, photochemical smog, and ionizing radiation, exceeding two-thirds of the impact on all of the resources and environment; (3) In terms of input and output items, the main impact of the new process on the resources and the environment is concentrated on the use of sodium hydroxide, accounting for 33.98% of the total equivalent, followed by sodium thiosulfate and sodium carbonate, respectively. These input–output items are the key fields that need attention in future technology improvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9265777 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92657772022-07-09 Comparison of Life Cycle Environmental Impact between Two Processes for Silver Separation from Copper Anode Slime Li, Zehong Zhang, Wenbiao Xia, Bing Wang, Chunying Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The cost of silver separation is lowered when ammonia and hydrazine hydrate are replaced with sodium thiosulfate and sodium dithionite in the process of extracting of metallic silver from copper anode slime. The overall environmental impact of two types of copper silver separation processes from anode slime has been analyzed\using the LCA method. Through the subdivision analysis, we found the raw materials or emission items that should be improved first. The following conclusions are drawn: (1) The life cycle environmental impact of the sodium thiosulfate process is much lower than the existing process; (2) The resource and environmental impacts of the sodium thiosulfate method are mainly in the fields of climate change, photochemical smog, and ionizing radiation, exceeding two-thirds of the impact on all of the resources and environment; (3) In terms of input and output items, the main impact of the new process on the resources and the environment is concentrated on the use of sodium hydroxide, accounting for 33.98% of the total equivalent, followed by sodium thiosulfate and sodium carbonate, respectively. These input–output items are the key fields that need attention in future technology improvement. MDPI 2022-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9265777/ /pubmed/35805449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137790 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Zehong Zhang, Wenbiao Xia, Bing Wang, Chunying Comparison of Life Cycle Environmental Impact between Two Processes for Silver Separation from Copper Anode Slime |
title | Comparison of Life Cycle Environmental Impact between Two Processes for Silver Separation from Copper Anode Slime |
title_full | Comparison of Life Cycle Environmental Impact between Two Processes for Silver Separation from Copper Anode Slime |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Life Cycle Environmental Impact between Two Processes for Silver Separation from Copper Anode Slime |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Life Cycle Environmental Impact between Two Processes for Silver Separation from Copper Anode Slime |
title_short | Comparison of Life Cycle Environmental Impact between Two Processes for Silver Separation from Copper Anode Slime |
title_sort | comparison of life cycle environmental impact between two processes for silver separation from copper anode slime |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9265777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35805449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137790 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lizehong comparisonoflifecycleenvironmentalimpactbetweentwoprocessesforsilverseparationfromcopperanodeslime AT zhangwenbiao comparisonoflifecycleenvironmentalimpactbetweentwoprocessesforsilverseparationfromcopperanodeslime AT xiabing comparisonoflifecycleenvironmentalimpactbetweentwoprocessesforsilverseparationfromcopperanodeslime AT wangchunying comparisonoflifecycleenvironmentalimpactbetweentwoprocessesforsilverseparationfromcopperanodeslime |