Cargando…

The Relationship between Resistance Training Frequency and Muscle Quality in Adolescents

Previous research has established the role of resistance training (RT) on muscle function in adolescents, but a lack of evidence to optimize RT for enhancing muscle quality (MQ) exists. This study examined whether RT frequency is associated with MQ in a nationally representative adolescent cohort. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naimo, Marshall A., Gu, Ja K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9265918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35805760
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138099
_version_ 1784743334060752896
author Naimo, Marshall A.
Gu, Ja K.
author_facet Naimo, Marshall A.
Gu, Ja K.
author_sort Naimo, Marshall A.
collection PubMed
description Previous research has established the role of resistance training (RT) on muscle function in adolescents, but a lack of evidence to optimize RT for enhancing muscle quality (MQ) exists. This study examined whether RT frequency is associated with MQ in a nationally representative adolescent cohort. A total of 605 adolescents (12–15 year) in NHANES were stratified based on RT frequency. MQ was calculated as combined handgrip strength divided by arm lean mass (via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry). Analysis of covariance was adjusted for sex, race/ethnicity, and arm fat percentage; p < 0.05 was considered significant. RT frequency was associated with MQ for 2–7 day/week but not 1 day/week. When no RT was compared to 1–2 and 3–7 day/week, associations were present for 3–7 day/week but not 1–2 day/week. When comparing no RT to 1–4 and 5–7 day/week, associations existed for 5–7 day/week but not 1–4 day/week. Next, no RT was compared to 1, 2–3, and 4–7 day/week; associations were found for 4–7 day/week, while 2–3 day/week had a borderline association (p = 0.06); there were no associations for 1 day/week. Finally, no RT was compared to 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5–7 day/week; associations were present for all except 1 and 3 day/week. These prospective data suggest a minimum RT frequency of 2 day/week is associated with MQ in adolescents as indicated by the lack of differences in MQ between 1 day/week RT versus no RT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9265918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92659182022-07-09 The Relationship between Resistance Training Frequency and Muscle Quality in Adolescents Naimo, Marshall A. Gu, Ja K. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Previous research has established the role of resistance training (RT) on muscle function in adolescents, but a lack of evidence to optimize RT for enhancing muscle quality (MQ) exists. This study examined whether RT frequency is associated with MQ in a nationally representative adolescent cohort. A total of 605 adolescents (12–15 year) in NHANES were stratified based on RT frequency. MQ was calculated as combined handgrip strength divided by arm lean mass (via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry). Analysis of covariance was adjusted for sex, race/ethnicity, and arm fat percentage; p < 0.05 was considered significant. RT frequency was associated with MQ for 2–7 day/week but not 1 day/week. When no RT was compared to 1–2 and 3–7 day/week, associations were present for 3–7 day/week but not 1–2 day/week. When comparing no RT to 1–4 and 5–7 day/week, associations existed for 5–7 day/week but not 1–4 day/week. Next, no RT was compared to 1, 2–3, and 4–7 day/week; associations were found for 4–7 day/week, while 2–3 day/week had a borderline association (p = 0.06); there were no associations for 1 day/week. Finally, no RT was compared to 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5–7 day/week; associations were present for all except 1 and 3 day/week. These prospective data suggest a minimum RT frequency of 2 day/week is associated with MQ in adolescents as indicated by the lack of differences in MQ between 1 day/week RT versus no RT. MDPI 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9265918/ /pubmed/35805760 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138099 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Naimo, Marshall A.
Gu, Ja K.
The Relationship between Resistance Training Frequency and Muscle Quality in Adolescents
title The Relationship between Resistance Training Frequency and Muscle Quality in Adolescents
title_full The Relationship between Resistance Training Frequency and Muscle Quality in Adolescents
title_fullStr The Relationship between Resistance Training Frequency and Muscle Quality in Adolescents
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship between Resistance Training Frequency and Muscle Quality in Adolescents
title_short The Relationship between Resistance Training Frequency and Muscle Quality in Adolescents
title_sort relationship between resistance training frequency and muscle quality in adolescents
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9265918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35805760
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138099
work_keys_str_mv AT naimomarshalla therelationshipbetweenresistancetrainingfrequencyandmusclequalityinadolescents
AT gujak therelationshipbetweenresistancetrainingfrequencyandmusclequalityinadolescents
AT naimomarshalla relationshipbetweenresistancetrainingfrequencyandmusclequalityinadolescents
AT gujak relationshipbetweenresistancetrainingfrequencyandmusclequalityinadolescents