Cargando…

Explaining Redundancy in CDK-Mediated Control of the Cell Cycle: Unifying the Continuum and Quantitative Models

In eukaryotes, cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are required for the onset of DNA replication and mitosis, and distinct CDK–cyclin complexes are activated sequentially throughout the cell cycle. It is widely thought that specific complexes are required to traverse a point of commitment to the cell cy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fisher, Daniel, Krasinska, Liliana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9265933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35805103
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11132019
_version_ 1784743337893298176
author Fisher, Daniel
Krasinska, Liliana
author_facet Fisher, Daniel
Krasinska, Liliana
author_sort Fisher, Daniel
collection PubMed
description In eukaryotes, cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are required for the onset of DNA replication and mitosis, and distinct CDK–cyclin complexes are activated sequentially throughout the cell cycle. It is widely thought that specific complexes are required to traverse a point of commitment to the cell cycle in G1, and to promote S-phase and mitosis, respectively. Thus, according to a popular model that has dominated the field for decades, the inherent specificity of distinct CDK–cyclin complexes for different substrates at each phase of the cell cycle generates the correct order and timing of events. However, the results from the knockouts of genes encoding cyclins and CDKs do not support this model. An alternative “quantitative” model, validated by much recent work, suggests that it is the overall level of CDK activity (with the opposing input of phosphatases) that determines the timing and order of S-phase and mitosis. We take this model further by suggesting that the subdivision of the cell cycle into discrete phases (G0, G1, S, G2, and M) is outdated and problematic. Instead, we revive the “continuum” model of the cell cycle and propose that a combination with the quantitative model better defines a conceptual framework for understanding cell cycle control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9265933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92659332022-07-09 Explaining Redundancy in CDK-Mediated Control of the Cell Cycle: Unifying the Continuum and Quantitative Models Fisher, Daniel Krasinska, Liliana Cells Review In eukaryotes, cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are required for the onset of DNA replication and mitosis, and distinct CDK–cyclin complexes are activated sequentially throughout the cell cycle. It is widely thought that specific complexes are required to traverse a point of commitment to the cell cycle in G1, and to promote S-phase and mitosis, respectively. Thus, according to a popular model that has dominated the field for decades, the inherent specificity of distinct CDK–cyclin complexes for different substrates at each phase of the cell cycle generates the correct order and timing of events. However, the results from the knockouts of genes encoding cyclins and CDKs do not support this model. An alternative “quantitative” model, validated by much recent work, suggests that it is the overall level of CDK activity (with the opposing input of phosphatases) that determines the timing and order of S-phase and mitosis. We take this model further by suggesting that the subdivision of the cell cycle into discrete phases (G0, G1, S, G2, and M) is outdated and problematic. Instead, we revive the “continuum” model of the cell cycle and propose that a combination with the quantitative model better defines a conceptual framework for understanding cell cycle control. MDPI 2022-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9265933/ /pubmed/35805103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11132019 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Fisher, Daniel
Krasinska, Liliana
Explaining Redundancy in CDK-Mediated Control of the Cell Cycle: Unifying the Continuum and Quantitative Models
title Explaining Redundancy in CDK-Mediated Control of the Cell Cycle: Unifying the Continuum and Quantitative Models
title_full Explaining Redundancy in CDK-Mediated Control of the Cell Cycle: Unifying the Continuum and Quantitative Models
title_fullStr Explaining Redundancy in CDK-Mediated Control of the Cell Cycle: Unifying the Continuum and Quantitative Models
title_full_unstemmed Explaining Redundancy in CDK-Mediated Control of the Cell Cycle: Unifying the Continuum and Quantitative Models
title_short Explaining Redundancy in CDK-Mediated Control of the Cell Cycle: Unifying the Continuum and Quantitative Models
title_sort explaining redundancy in cdk-mediated control of the cell cycle: unifying the continuum and quantitative models
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9265933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35805103
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11132019
work_keys_str_mv AT fisherdaniel explainingredundancyincdkmediatedcontrolofthecellcycleunifyingthecontinuumandquantitativemodels
AT krasinskaliliana explainingredundancyincdkmediatedcontrolofthecellcycleunifyingthecontinuumandquantitativemodels