Cargando…
Development of a Quantitative Instrument to Elicit Patient Preferences for Person-Centered Dementia Care Stage 1: A Formative Qualitative Study to Identify Patient Relevant Criteria for Experimental Design of an Analytic Hierarchy Process
Background: Person-centered care (PCC) requires knowledge about patient preferences. This formative qualitative study aimed to identify (sub)criteria of PCC for the design of a quantitative, choice-based instrument to elicit patient preferences for person-centered dementia care. Method: Interviews w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9266267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35805286 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137629 |
_version_ | 1784743424075759616 |
---|---|
author | Mohr, Wiebke Rädke, Anika Afi, Adel Mühlichen, Franka Platen, Moritz Michalowsky, Bernhard Hoffmann, Wolfgang |
author_facet | Mohr, Wiebke Rädke, Anika Afi, Adel Mühlichen, Franka Platen, Moritz Michalowsky, Bernhard Hoffmann, Wolfgang |
author_sort | Mohr, Wiebke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Person-centered care (PCC) requires knowledge about patient preferences. This formative qualitative study aimed to identify (sub)criteria of PCC for the design of a quantitative, choice-based instrument to elicit patient preferences for person-centered dementia care. Method: Interviews were conducted with n = 2 dementia care managers, n = 10 People living with Dementia (PlwD), and n = 3 caregivers (CGs), which followed a semi-structured interview guide including a card game with PCC criteria identified from the literature. Criteria cards were shown to explore the PlwD’s conception. PlwD were asked to rank the cards to identify patient-relevant criteria of PCC. Audios were verbatim-transcribed and analyzed with qualitative content analysis. Card game results were coded on a 10-point-scale, and sums and means for criteria were calculated. Results: Six criteria with two sub-criteria emerged from the analysis; social relationships (indirect contact, direct contact), cognitive training (passive, active), organization of care (decentralized structures and no shared decision making, centralized structures and shared decision making), assistance with daily activities (professional, family member), characteristics of care professionals (empathy, education and work experience) and physical activities (alone, group). Dementia-sensitive wording and balance between comprehensibility vs. completeness of the (sub)criteria emerged as additional themes. Conclusions: Our formative study provides initial data about patient-relevant criteria of PCC to design a quantitative patient preference instrument. Future research may want to consider the balance between (sub)criteria comprehensibility vs. completeness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9266267 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92662672022-07-09 Development of a Quantitative Instrument to Elicit Patient Preferences for Person-Centered Dementia Care Stage 1: A Formative Qualitative Study to Identify Patient Relevant Criteria for Experimental Design of an Analytic Hierarchy Process Mohr, Wiebke Rädke, Anika Afi, Adel Mühlichen, Franka Platen, Moritz Michalowsky, Bernhard Hoffmann, Wolfgang Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: Person-centered care (PCC) requires knowledge about patient preferences. This formative qualitative study aimed to identify (sub)criteria of PCC for the design of a quantitative, choice-based instrument to elicit patient preferences for person-centered dementia care. Method: Interviews were conducted with n = 2 dementia care managers, n = 10 People living with Dementia (PlwD), and n = 3 caregivers (CGs), which followed a semi-structured interview guide including a card game with PCC criteria identified from the literature. Criteria cards were shown to explore the PlwD’s conception. PlwD were asked to rank the cards to identify patient-relevant criteria of PCC. Audios were verbatim-transcribed and analyzed with qualitative content analysis. Card game results were coded on a 10-point-scale, and sums and means for criteria were calculated. Results: Six criteria with two sub-criteria emerged from the analysis; social relationships (indirect contact, direct contact), cognitive training (passive, active), organization of care (decentralized structures and no shared decision making, centralized structures and shared decision making), assistance with daily activities (professional, family member), characteristics of care professionals (empathy, education and work experience) and physical activities (alone, group). Dementia-sensitive wording and balance between comprehensibility vs. completeness of the (sub)criteria emerged as additional themes. Conclusions: Our formative study provides initial data about patient-relevant criteria of PCC to design a quantitative patient preference instrument. Future research may want to consider the balance between (sub)criteria comprehensibility vs. completeness. MDPI 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9266267/ /pubmed/35805286 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137629 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mohr, Wiebke Rädke, Anika Afi, Adel Mühlichen, Franka Platen, Moritz Michalowsky, Bernhard Hoffmann, Wolfgang Development of a Quantitative Instrument to Elicit Patient Preferences for Person-Centered Dementia Care Stage 1: A Formative Qualitative Study to Identify Patient Relevant Criteria for Experimental Design of an Analytic Hierarchy Process |
title | Development of a Quantitative Instrument to Elicit Patient Preferences for Person-Centered Dementia Care Stage 1: A Formative Qualitative Study to Identify Patient Relevant Criteria for Experimental Design of an Analytic Hierarchy Process |
title_full | Development of a Quantitative Instrument to Elicit Patient Preferences for Person-Centered Dementia Care Stage 1: A Formative Qualitative Study to Identify Patient Relevant Criteria for Experimental Design of an Analytic Hierarchy Process |
title_fullStr | Development of a Quantitative Instrument to Elicit Patient Preferences for Person-Centered Dementia Care Stage 1: A Formative Qualitative Study to Identify Patient Relevant Criteria for Experimental Design of an Analytic Hierarchy Process |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a Quantitative Instrument to Elicit Patient Preferences for Person-Centered Dementia Care Stage 1: A Formative Qualitative Study to Identify Patient Relevant Criteria for Experimental Design of an Analytic Hierarchy Process |
title_short | Development of a Quantitative Instrument to Elicit Patient Preferences for Person-Centered Dementia Care Stage 1: A Formative Qualitative Study to Identify Patient Relevant Criteria for Experimental Design of an Analytic Hierarchy Process |
title_sort | development of a quantitative instrument to elicit patient preferences for person-centered dementia care stage 1: a formative qualitative study to identify patient relevant criteria for experimental design of an analytic hierarchy process |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9266267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35805286 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137629 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohrwiebke developmentofaquantitativeinstrumenttoelicitpatientpreferencesforpersoncentereddementiacarestage1aformativequalitativestudytoidentifypatientrelevantcriteriaforexperimentaldesignofananalytichierarchyprocess AT radkeanika developmentofaquantitativeinstrumenttoelicitpatientpreferencesforpersoncentereddementiacarestage1aformativequalitativestudytoidentifypatientrelevantcriteriaforexperimentaldesignofananalytichierarchyprocess AT afiadel developmentofaquantitativeinstrumenttoelicitpatientpreferencesforpersoncentereddementiacarestage1aformativequalitativestudytoidentifypatientrelevantcriteriaforexperimentaldesignofananalytichierarchyprocess AT muhlichenfranka developmentofaquantitativeinstrumenttoelicitpatientpreferencesforpersoncentereddementiacarestage1aformativequalitativestudytoidentifypatientrelevantcriteriaforexperimentaldesignofananalytichierarchyprocess AT platenmoritz developmentofaquantitativeinstrumenttoelicitpatientpreferencesforpersoncentereddementiacarestage1aformativequalitativestudytoidentifypatientrelevantcriteriaforexperimentaldesignofananalytichierarchyprocess AT michalowskybernhard developmentofaquantitativeinstrumenttoelicitpatientpreferencesforpersoncentereddementiacarestage1aformativequalitativestudytoidentifypatientrelevantcriteriaforexperimentaldesignofananalytichierarchyprocess AT hoffmannwolfgang developmentofaquantitativeinstrumenttoelicitpatientpreferencesforpersoncentereddementiacarestage1aformativequalitativestudytoidentifypatientrelevantcriteriaforexperimentaldesignofananalytichierarchyprocess |