Cargando…

Development of a Quantitative Instrument to Elicit Patient Preferences for Person-Centered Dementia Care Stage 1: A Formative Qualitative Study to Identify Patient Relevant Criteria for Experimental Design of an Analytic Hierarchy Process

Background: Person-centered care (PCC) requires knowledge about patient preferences. This formative qualitative study aimed to identify (sub)criteria of PCC for the design of a quantitative, choice-based instrument to elicit patient preferences for person-centered dementia care. Method: Interviews w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohr, Wiebke, Rädke, Anika, Afi, Adel, Mühlichen, Franka, Platen, Moritz, Michalowsky, Bernhard, Hoffmann, Wolfgang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9266267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35805286
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137629
_version_ 1784743424075759616
author Mohr, Wiebke
Rädke, Anika
Afi, Adel
Mühlichen, Franka
Platen, Moritz
Michalowsky, Bernhard
Hoffmann, Wolfgang
author_facet Mohr, Wiebke
Rädke, Anika
Afi, Adel
Mühlichen, Franka
Platen, Moritz
Michalowsky, Bernhard
Hoffmann, Wolfgang
author_sort Mohr, Wiebke
collection PubMed
description Background: Person-centered care (PCC) requires knowledge about patient preferences. This formative qualitative study aimed to identify (sub)criteria of PCC for the design of a quantitative, choice-based instrument to elicit patient preferences for person-centered dementia care. Method: Interviews were conducted with n = 2 dementia care managers, n = 10 People living with Dementia (PlwD), and n = 3 caregivers (CGs), which followed a semi-structured interview guide including a card game with PCC criteria identified from the literature. Criteria cards were shown to explore the PlwD’s conception. PlwD were asked to rank the cards to identify patient-relevant criteria of PCC. Audios were verbatim-transcribed and analyzed with qualitative content analysis. Card game results were coded on a 10-point-scale, and sums and means for criteria were calculated. Results: Six criteria with two sub-criteria emerged from the analysis; social relationships (indirect contact, direct contact), cognitive training (passive, active), organization of care (decentralized structures and no shared decision making, centralized structures and shared decision making), assistance with daily activities (professional, family member), characteristics of care professionals (empathy, education and work experience) and physical activities (alone, group). Dementia-sensitive wording and balance between comprehensibility vs. completeness of the (sub)criteria emerged as additional themes. Conclusions: Our formative study provides initial data about patient-relevant criteria of PCC to design a quantitative patient preference instrument. Future research may want to consider the balance between (sub)criteria comprehensibility vs. completeness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9266267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92662672022-07-09 Development of a Quantitative Instrument to Elicit Patient Preferences for Person-Centered Dementia Care Stage 1: A Formative Qualitative Study to Identify Patient Relevant Criteria for Experimental Design of an Analytic Hierarchy Process Mohr, Wiebke Rädke, Anika Afi, Adel Mühlichen, Franka Platen, Moritz Michalowsky, Bernhard Hoffmann, Wolfgang Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: Person-centered care (PCC) requires knowledge about patient preferences. This formative qualitative study aimed to identify (sub)criteria of PCC for the design of a quantitative, choice-based instrument to elicit patient preferences for person-centered dementia care. Method: Interviews were conducted with n = 2 dementia care managers, n = 10 People living with Dementia (PlwD), and n = 3 caregivers (CGs), which followed a semi-structured interview guide including a card game with PCC criteria identified from the literature. Criteria cards were shown to explore the PlwD’s conception. PlwD were asked to rank the cards to identify patient-relevant criteria of PCC. Audios were verbatim-transcribed and analyzed with qualitative content analysis. Card game results were coded on a 10-point-scale, and sums and means for criteria were calculated. Results: Six criteria with two sub-criteria emerged from the analysis; social relationships (indirect contact, direct contact), cognitive training (passive, active), organization of care (decentralized structures and no shared decision making, centralized structures and shared decision making), assistance with daily activities (professional, family member), characteristics of care professionals (empathy, education and work experience) and physical activities (alone, group). Dementia-sensitive wording and balance between comprehensibility vs. completeness of the (sub)criteria emerged as additional themes. Conclusions: Our formative study provides initial data about patient-relevant criteria of PCC to design a quantitative patient preference instrument. Future research may want to consider the balance between (sub)criteria comprehensibility vs. completeness. MDPI 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9266267/ /pubmed/35805286 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137629 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mohr, Wiebke
Rädke, Anika
Afi, Adel
Mühlichen, Franka
Platen, Moritz
Michalowsky, Bernhard
Hoffmann, Wolfgang
Development of a Quantitative Instrument to Elicit Patient Preferences for Person-Centered Dementia Care Stage 1: A Formative Qualitative Study to Identify Patient Relevant Criteria for Experimental Design of an Analytic Hierarchy Process
title Development of a Quantitative Instrument to Elicit Patient Preferences for Person-Centered Dementia Care Stage 1: A Formative Qualitative Study to Identify Patient Relevant Criteria for Experimental Design of an Analytic Hierarchy Process
title_full Development of a Quantitative Instrument to Elicit Patient Preferences for Person-Centered Dementia Care Stage 1: A Formative Qualitative Study to Identify Patient Relevant Criteria for Experimental Design of an Analytic Hierarchy Process
title_fullStr Development of a Quantitative Instrument to Elicit Patient Preferences for Person-Centered Dementia Care Stage 1: A Formative Qualitative Study to Identify Patient Relevant Criteria for Experimental Design of an Analytic Hierarchy Process
title_full_unstemmed Development of a Quantitative Instrument to Elicit Patient Preferences for Person-Centered Dementia Care Stage 1: A Formative Qualitative Study to Identify Patient Relevant Criteria for Experimental Design of an Analytic Hierarchy Process
title_short Development of a Quantitative Instrument to Elicit Patient Preferences for Person-Centered Dementia Care Stage 1: A Formative Qualitative Study to Identify Patient Relevant Criteria for Experimental Design of an Analytic Hierarchy Process
title_sort development of a quantitative instrument to elicit patient preferences for person-centered dementia care stage 1: a formative qualitative study to identify patient relevant criteria for experimental design of an analytic hierarchy process
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9266267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35805286
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137629
work_keys_str_mv AT mohrwiebke developmentofaquantitativeinstrumenttoelicitpatientpreferencesforpersoncentereddementiacarestage1aformativequalitativestudytoidentifypatientrelevantcriteriaforexperimentaldesignofananalytichierarchyprocess
AT radkeanika developmentofaquantitativeinstrumenttoelicitpatientpreferencesforpersoncentereddementiacarestage1aformativequalitativestudytoidentifypatientrelevantcriteriaforexperimentaldesignofananalytichierarchyprocess
AT afiadel developmentofaquantitativeinstrumenttoelicitpatientpreferencesforpersoncentereddementiacarestage1aformativequalitativestudytoidentifypatientrelevantcriteriaforexperimentaldesignofananalytichierarchyprocess
AT muhlichenfranka developmentofaquantitativeinstrumenttoelicitpatientpreferencesforpersoncentereddementiacarestage1aformativequalitativestudytoidentifypatientrelevantcriteriaforexperimentaldesignofananalytichierarchyprocess
AT platenmoritz developmentofaquantitativeinstrumenttoelicitpatientpreferencesforpersoncentereddementiacarestage1aformativequalitativestudytoidentifypatientrelevantcriteriaforexperimentaldesignofananalytichierarchyprocess
AT michalowskybernhard developmentofaquantitativeinstrumenttoelicitpatientpreferencesforpersoncentereddementiacarestage1aformativequalitativestudytoidentifypatientrelevantcriteriaforexperimentaldesignofananalytichierarchyprocess
AT hoffmannwolfgang developmentofaquantitativeinstrumenttoelicitpatientpreferencesforpersoncentereddementiacarestage1aformativequalitativestudytoidentifypatientrelevantcriteriaforexperimentaldesignofananalytichierarchyprocess