Cargando…

Is Hartmann’s Pouch an Option in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis?

Background: The surgical management of remnant rectosigmoid after subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy for acute severe ulcerative colitis remains controversial with respect to the need to perform sigmoidostomy or Hartmann’s pouch. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate whether Hart...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Renaud, Myriam, Ayav, Ahmet, Caron, Bénédicte, Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent, Germain, Adeline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133857
_version_ 1784743663590440960
author Renaud, Myriam
Ayav, Ahmet
Caron, Bénédicte
Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent
Germain, Adeline
author_facet Renaud, Myriam
Ayav, Ahmet
Caron, Bénédicte
Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent
Germain, Adeline
author_sort Renaud, Myriam
collection PubMed
description Background: The surgical management of remnant rectosigmoid after subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy for acute severe ulcerative colitis remains controversial with respect to the need to perform sigmoidostomy or Hartmann’s pouch. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate whether Hartmann’s pouch may be a safe option. Methods: Thirty-eight Hartmann’s pouches were performed between January 2003 and December 2015. We looked at morbidity (with a focus on the occurrence of pelvic sepsis and leakage of the rectal stump) and the rate of restored intestinal continuity. Results: Nineteen patients had surgical complications. Seven had an intra-abdominal collection, only one of which was in the pelvis, and the patient had to be reoperated. Only one patient had a reopening of the rectal stump, which was revealed by rectal bleeding. Twenty-six patients (68.4%) underwent further proctectomy with ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis with no difficulty in localizing or mobilizing the rectal stump and no major surgical complications. Conclusions: Hartmann’s pouch may be considered in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis, with low rates of morbidity and pelvic sepsis. The restoration of intestinal continuity is possible after this procedure without any special difficulty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9267214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92672142022-07-09 Is Hartmann’s Pouch an Option in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis? Renaud, Myriam Ayav, Ahmet Caron, Bénédicte Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent Germain, Adeline J Clin Med Article Background: The surgical management of remnant rectosigmoid after subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy for acute severe ulcerative colitis remains controversial with respect to the need to perform sigmoidostomy or Hartmann’s pouch. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate whether Hartmann’s pouch may be a safe option. Methods: Thirty-eight Hartmann’s pouches were performed between January 2003 and December 2015. We looked at morbidity (with a focus on the occurrence of pelvic sepsis and leakage of the rectal stump) and the rate of restored intestinal continuity. Results: Nineteen patients had surgical complications. Seven had an intra-abdominal collection, only one of which was in the pelvis, and the patient had to be reoperated. Only one patient had a reopening of the rectal stump, which was revealed by rectal bleeding. Twenty-six patients (68.4%) underwent further proctectomy with ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis with no difficulty in localizing or mobilizing the rectal stump and no major surgical complications. Conclusions: Hartmann’s pouch may be considered in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis, with low rates of morbidity and pelvic sepsis. The restoration of intestinal continuity is possible after this procedure without any special difficulty. MDPI 2022-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9267214/ /pubmed/35807142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133857 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Renaud, Myriam
Ayav, Ahmet
Caron, Bénédicte
Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent
Germain, Adeline
Is Hartmann’s Pouch an Option in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis?
title Is Hartmann’s Pouch an Option in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis?
title_full Is Hartmann’s Pouch an Option in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis?
title_fullStr Is Hartmann’s Pouch an Option in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis?
title_full_unstemmed Is Hartmann’s Pouch an Option in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis?
title_short Is Hartmann’s Pouch an Option in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis?
title_sort is hartmann’s pouch an option in the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133857
work_keys_str_mv AT renaudmyriam ishartmannspouchanoptioninthemanagementofacutesevereulcerativecolitis
AT ayavahmet ishartmannspouchanoptioninthemanagementofacutesevereulcerativecolitis
AT caronbenedicte ishartmannspouchanoptioninthemanagementofacutesevereulcerativecolitis
AT peyrinbirouletlaurent ishartmannspouchanoptioninthemanagementofacutesevereulcerativecolitis
AT germainadeline ishartmannspouchanoptioninthemanagementofacutesevereulcerativecolitis