Cargando…
Is Hartmann’s Pouch an Option in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis?
Background: The surgical management of remnant rectosigmoid after subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy for acute severe ulcerative colitis remains controversial with respect to the need to perform sigmoidostomy or Hartmann’s pouch. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate whether Hart...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133857 |
_version_ | 1784743663590440960 |
---|---|
author | Renaud, Myriam Ayav, Ahmet Caron, Bénédicte Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent Germain, Adeline |
author_facet | Renaud, Myriam Ayav, Ahmet Caron, Bénédicte Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent Germain, Adeline |
author_sort | Renaud, Myriam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The surgical management of remnant rectosigmoid after subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy for acute severe ulcerative colitis remains controversial with respect to the need to perform sigmoidostomy or Hartmann’s pouch. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate whether Hartmann’s pouch may be a safe option. Methods: Thirty-eight Hartmann’s pouches were performed between January 2003 and December 2015. We looked at morbidity (with a focus on the occurrence of pelvic sepsis and leakage of the rectal stump) and the rate of restored intestinal continuity. Results: Nineteen patients had surgical complications. Seven had an intra-abdominal collection, only one of which was in the pelvis, and the patient had to be reoperated. Only one patient had a reopening of the rectal stump, which was revealed by rectal bleeding. Twenty-six patients (68.4%) underwent further proctectomy with ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis with no difficulty in localizing or mobilizing the rectal stump and no major surgical complications. Conclusions: Hartmann’s pouch may be considered in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis, with low rates of morbidity and pelvic sepsis. The restoration of intestinal continuity is possible after this procedure without any special difficulty. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9267214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92672142022-07-09 Is Hartmann’s Pouch an Option in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis? Renaud, Myriam Ayav, Ahmet Caron, Bénédicte Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent Germain, Adeline J Clin Med Article Background: The surgical management of remnant rectosigmoid after subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy for acute severe ulcerative colitis remains controversial with respect to the need to perform sigmoidostomy or Hartmann’s pouch. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate whether Hartmann’s pouch may be a safe option. Methods: Thirty-eight Hartmann’s pouches were performed between January 2003 and December 2015. We looked at morbidity (with a focus on the occurrence of pelvic sepsis and leakage of the rectal stump) and the rate of restored intestinal continuity. Results: Nineteen patients had surgical complications. Seven had an intra-abdominal collection, only one of which was in the pelvis, and the patient had to be reoperated. Only one patient had a reopening of the rectal stump, which was revealed by rectal bleeding. Twenty-six patients (68.4%) underwent further proctectomy with ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis with no difficulty in localizing or mobilizing the rectal stump and no major surgical complications. Conclusions: Hartmann’s pouch may be considered in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis, with low rates of morbidity and pelvic sepsis. The restoration of intestinal continuity is possible after this procedure without any special difficulty. MDPI 2022-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9267214/ /pubmed/35807142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133857 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Renaud, Myriam Ayav, Ahmet Caron, Bénédicte Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent Germain, Adeline Is Hartmann’s Pouch an Option in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis? |
title | Is Hartmann’s Pouch an Option in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis? |
title_full | Is Hartmann’s Pouch an Option in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis? |
title_fullStr | Is Hartmann’s Pouch an Option in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Hartmann’s Pouch an Option in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis? |
title_short | Is Hartmann’s Pouch an Option in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis? |
title_sort | is hartmann’s pouch an option in the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133857 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT renaudmyriam ishartmannspouchanoptioninthemanagementofacutesevereulcerativecolitis AT ayavahmet ishartmannspouchanoptioninthemanagementofacutesevereulcerativecolitis AT caronbenedicte ishartmannspouchanoptioninthemanagementofacutesevereulcerativecolitis AT peyrinbirouletlaurent ishartmannspouchanoptioninthemanagementofacutesevereulcerativecolitis AT germainadeline ishartmannspouchanoptioninthemanagementofacutesevereulcerativecolitis |