Cargando…

Biocompatibility of ZrO(2) vs. Y-TZP Alloys: Influence of Their Composition and Surface Topography

The osseointegration of implants is defined as the direct anatomical and functional connection between neoformed living bone and the surface of a supporting implant. The biological compatibility of implants depends on various parameters, such as the nature of the material, chemical composition, surf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tchinda, Alex, Chézeau, Laëtitia, Pierson, Gaël, Kouitat-Njiwa, Richard, Rihn, B H, Bravetti, Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35806779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15134655
_version_ 1784743666636554240
author Tchinda, Alex
Chézeau, Laëtitia
Pierson, Gaël
Kouitat-Njiwa, Richard
Rihn, B H
Bravetti, Pierre
author_facet Tchinda, Alex
Chézeau, Laëtitia
Pierson, Gaël
Kouitat-Njiwa, Richard
Rihn, B H
Bravetti, Pierre
author_sort Tchinda, Alex
collection PubMed
description The osseointegration of implants is defined as the direct anatomical and functional connection between neoformed living bone and the surface of a supporting implant. The biological compatibility of implants depends on various parameters, such as the nature of the material, chemical composition, surface topography, chemistry and loading, surface treatment, and physical and mechanical properties. In this context, the objective of this study is to evaluate the biocompatibility of rough (Ra = 1 µm) and smooth (Ra = 0 µm) surface conditions of yttria–zirconia (Y-TZP) discs compared to pure zirconia (ZrO(2)) discs by combining a classical toxicological test, morphological observations by SEM, and a transcriptomic analysis on an in vitro model of human Saos-2 bone cells. Similar cell proliferation rates were observed between ZrO(2) and Y-TZP discs and control cells, regardless of the surface topography, at up to 96 h of exposure. Dense cell matting was similarly observed on the surfaces of both materials. Interestingly, only 110 transcripts were differentially expressed across the human transcriptome, consistent with the excellent biocompatibility of Y-TZP reported in the literature. These deregulated transcripts are mainly involved in two pathways, the first being related to “mineral uptake” and the second being the “immune response”. These observations suggest that Y-TZP is an interesting candidate for application in implantology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9267226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92672262022-07-09 Biocompatibility of ZrO(2) vs. Y-TZP Alloys: Influence of Their Composition and Surface Topography Tchinda, Alex Chézeau, Laëtitia Pierson, Gaël Kouitat-Njiwa, Richard Rihn, B H Bravetti, Pierre Materials (Basel) Article The osseointegration of implants is defined as the direct anatomical and functional connection between neoformed living bone and the surface of a supporting implant. The biological compatibility of implants depends on various parameters, such as the nature of the material, chemical composition, surface topography, chemistry and loading, surface treatment, and physical and mechanical properties. In this context, the objective of this study is to evaluate the biocompatibility of rough (Ra = 1 µm) and smooth (Ra = 0 µm) surface conditions of yttria–zirconia (Y-TZP) discs compared to pure zirconia (ZrO(2)) discs by combining a classical toxicological test, morphological observations by SEM, and a transcriptomic analysis on an in vitro model of human Saos-2 bone cells. Similar cell proliferation rates were observed between ZrO(2) and Y-TZP discs and control cells, regardless of the surface topography, at up to 96 h of exposure. Dense cell matting was similarly observed on the surfaces of both materials. Interestingly, only 110 transcripts were differentially expressed across the human transcriptome, consistent with the excellent biocompatibility of Y-TZP reported in the literature. These deregulated transcripts are mainly involved in two pathways, the first being related to “mineral uptake” and the second being the “immune response”. These observations suggest that Y-TZP is an interesting candidate for application in implantology. MDPI 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9267226/ /pubmed/35806779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15134655 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tchinda, Alex
Chézeau, Laëtitia
Pierson, Gaël
Kouitat-Njiwa, Richard
Rihn, B H
Bravetti, Pierre
Biocompatibility of ZrO(2) vs. Y-TZP Alloys: Influence of Their Composition and Surface Topography
title Biocompatibility of ZrO(2) vs. Y-TZP Alloys: Influence of Their Composition and Surface Topography
title_full Biocompatibility of ZrO(2) vs. Y-TZP Alloys: Influence of Their Composition and Surface Topography
title_fullStr Biocompatibility of ZrO(2) vs. Y-TZP Alloys: Influence of Their Composition and Surface Topography
title_full_unstemmed Biocompatibility of ZrO(2) vs. Y-TZP Alloys: Influence of Their Composition and Surface Topography
title_short Biocompatibility of ZrO(2) vs. Y-TZP Alloys: Influence of Their Composition and Surface Topography
title_sort biocompatibility of zro(2) vs. y-tzp alloys: influence of their composition and surface topography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35806779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15134655
work_keys_str_mv AT tchindaalex biocompatibilityofzro2vsytzpalloysinfluenceoftheircompositionandsurfacetopography
AT chezeaulaetitia biocompatibilityofzro2vsytzpalloysinfluenceoftheircompositionandsurfacetopography
AT piersongael biocompatibilityofzro2vsytzpalloysinfluenceoftheircompositionandsurfacetopography
AT kouitatnjiwarichard biocompatibilityofzro2vsytzpalloysinfluenceoftheircompositionandsurfacetopography
AT rihnbh biocompatibilityofzro2vsytzpalloysinfluenceoftheircompositionandsurfacetopography
AT bravettipierre biocompatibilityofzro2vsytzpalloysinfluenceoftheircompositionandsurfacetopography