Cargando…

Influence of Exposure Parameters and Implant Position in Peri-Implant Bone Assessment in CBCT Images: An In Vitro Study

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of dimensional distortion and its changes with modification of exposure setting parameters on the measurements of peri-implant bone margin. Ten titanium dental implants (InKone Primo, Global D, Paris, France) were placed in two prepared bovine ribs. Two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sawicki, Paweł, Regulski, Piotr, Winiarski, Artur, Zawadzki, Paweł J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807131
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133846
_version_ 1784743700141703168
author Sawicki, Paweł
Regulski, Piotr
Winiarski, Artur
Zawadzki, Paweł J.
author_facet Sawicki, Paweł
Regulski, Piotr
Winiarski, Artur
Zawadzki, Paweł J.
author_sort Sawicki, Paweł
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to assess the impact of dimensional distortion and its changes with modification of exposure setting parameters on the measurements of peri-implant bone margin. Ten titanium dental implants (InKone Primo, Global D, Paris, France) were placed in two prepared bovine ribs. Two bone models and an implant-with-transfer model were scanned with 3shape E4 (3shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) laboratory scanner. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of two bone models were taken with different values of voltage (60, 70, 80, 90 kV), tube current (4, 10 mA) and voxel size (200, 300 µm). All the data were superimposed using planning software, and the measurements of buccal bone thickness in two selected regions were performed both using CBCT and scan cross-sections. The mean squared error (MSE) being the squared differences between measurements was used in the accuracy assessment of the CBCT device. A one-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between voltage and MSE (p = 0.044), as well as implant position and MSE (p = 0.005). The distortions of measurements depend on bone margin thickness, and the higher the distance to measure, the higher the error. Accurate measurements of buccal bone thickness (MSE below 0.25) were achieved with voltage values of 70, 80, and 90 kV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9267359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92673592022-07-09 Influence of Exposure Parameters and Implant Position in Peri-Implant Bone Assessment in CBCT Images: An In Vitro Study Sawicki, Paweł Regulski, Piotr Winiarski, Artur Zawadzki, Paweł J. J Clin Med Article The aim of this study was to assess the impact of dimensional distortion and its changes with modification of exposure setting parameters on the measurements of peri-implant bone margin. Ten titanium dental implants (InKone Primo, Global D, Paris, France) were placed in two prepared bovine ribs. Two bone models and an implant-with-transfer model were scanned with 3shape E4 (3shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) laboratory scanner. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of two bone models were taken with different values of voltage (60, 70, 80, 90 kV), tube current (4, 10 mA) and voxel size (200, 300 µm). All the data were superimposed using planning software, and the measurements of buccal bone thickness in two selected regions were performed both using CBCT and scan cross-sections. The mean squared error (MSE) being the squared differences between measurements was used in the accuracy assessment of the CBCT device. A one-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between voltage and MSE (p = 0.044), as well as implant position and MSE (p = 0.005). The distortions of measurements depend on bone margin thickness, and the higher the distance to measure, the higher the error. Accurate measurements of buccal bone thickness (MSE below 0.25) were achieved with voltage values of 70, 80, and 90 kV. MDPI 2022-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9267359/ /pubmed/35807131 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133846 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sawicki, Paweł
Regulski, Piotr
Winiarski, Artur
Zawadzki, Paweł J.
Influence of Exposure Parameters and Implant Position in Peri-Implant Bone Assessment in CBCT Images: An In Vitro Study
title Influence of Exposure Parameters and Implant Position in Peri-Implant Bone Assessment in CBCT Images: An In Vitro Study
title_full Influence of Exposure Parameters and Implant Position in Peri-Implant Bone Assessment in CBCT Images: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Influence of Exposure Parameters and Implant Position in Peri-Implant Bone Assessment in CBCT Images: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Exposure Parameters and Implant Position in Peri-Implant Bone Assessment in CBCT Images: An In Vitro Study
title_short Influence of Exposure Parameters and Implant Position in Peri-Implant Bone Assessment in CBCT Images: An In Vitro Study
title_sort influence of exposure parameters and implant position in peri-implant bone assessment in cbct images: an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807131
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133846
work_keys_str_mv AT sawickipaweł influenceofexposureparametersandimplantpositioninperiimplantboneassessmentincbctimagesaninvitrostudy
AT regulskipiotr influenceofexposureparametersandimplantpositioninperiimplantboneassessmentincbctimagesaninvitrostudy
AT winiarskiartur influenceofexposureparametersandimplantpositioninperiimplantboneassessmentincbctimagesaninvitrostudy
AT zawadzkipawełj influenceofexposureparametersandimplantpositioninperiimplantboneassessmentincbctimagesaninvitrostudy