Cargando…

Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Instrumentation Using ProTaper Next or Reciproc in Asymptomatic Molars: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial

Aim: The development of postoperative pain following root canal instrumentation may impair patient’s comfort and undermine their trust in the dentist. This study assessed the effect of root canal instrumentation techniques (rotary (PTN; ProTaper Next(®)) and reciprocating (R; Reciproc(®))) on the po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliveira, Patrícia Santos, Ferreira, Meire Coelho, Paula, Natália Gomes Nascimento, Loguercio, Alessandro Dourado, Grazziotin-Soares, Renata, da Silva, Gisele Rodrigues, da Mata, Helena Cristina Santos, Bauer, José, Carvalho, Ceci Nunes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807101
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133816
_version_ 1784743708271312896
author Oliveira, Patrícia Santos
Ferreira, Meire Coelho
Paula, Natália Gomes Nascimento
Loguercio, Alessandro Dourado
Grazziotin-Soares, Renata
da Silva, Gisele Rodrigues
da Mata, Helena Cristina Santos
Bauer, José
Carvalho, Ceci Nunes
author_facet Oliveira, Patrícia Santos
Ferreira, Meire Coelho
Paula, Natália Gomes Nascimento
Loguercio, Alessandro Dourado
Grazziotin-Soares, Renata
da Silva, Gisele Rodrigues
da Mata, Helena Cristina Santos
Bauer, José
Carvalho, Ceci Nunes
author_sort Oliveira, Patrícia Santos
collection PubMed
description Aim: The development of postoperative pain following root canal instrumentation may impair patient’s comfort and undermine their trust in the dentist. This study assessed the effect of root canal instrumentation techniques (rotary (PTN; ProTaper Next(®)) and reciprocating (R; Reciproc(®))) on the postoperative pain intensity (primary outcome) and tenderness on biting (secondary outcome) of patients’ asymptomatic molars. Methodology: This study protocol was registered with ReBec-WHO (U1111-1182-2800). From a pool of 112 patients evaluated for eligibility (healthy adults (≤18 years old)), with a single asymptomatic molar (maxillary or mandibular) indicated for root canal treatment, diagnosed with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis (including chronic hyperplastic pulpitis), 75 were randomly allocated in similar proportions to receive the intervention (two-appointment root canal therapy) in either the PTN or R group. The allocated procedures were performed using standardized protocols. Participants (blinded to the instrumentation technique) rated their pain intensity at 6, 12 and 24 h and from day 2 to day 7 following the root canal instrumentation appointment using a VAS and an NRS; the ibuprofen tablets taken and the presence of tenderness on biting were recorded. The instrumentation time was registered. Univariate and multivariate statistics measured the effect of independent variables on the outcomes. Results: From the 75 patients allocated, 8 patients (4 from each group) were lost; in total, 33 patients were analyzed in the PTN group and 34 in the R group. The frequencies of postoperative pain (p > 0.05) and tenderness on biting (p > 0.05) were similar between groups. The medication intake (mean of 1.31 tablets) and the time of instrumentation (approximately 11 min) were similar between groups. Conclusion: ProTaper Next and Reciproc(®) caused a slight risk of tenderness on biting and contributed to similar self-reported postoperative pain (low intensity) up to 7 days following root canal shaping.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9267392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92673922022-07-09 Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Instrumentation Using ProTaper Next or Reciproc in Asymptomatic Molars: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial Oliveira, Patrícia Santos Ferreira, Meire Coelho Paula, Natália Gomes Nascimento Loguercio, Alessandro Dourado Grazziotin-Soares, Renata da Silva, Gisele Rodrigues da Mata, Helena Cristina Santos Bauer, José Carvalho, Ceci Nunes J Clin Med Article Aim: The development of postoperative pain following root canal instrumentation may impair patient’s comfort and undermine their trust in the dentist. This study assessed the effect of root canal instrumentation techniques (rotary (PTN; ProTaper Next(®)) and reciprocating (R; Reciproc(®))) on the postoperative pain intensity (primary outcome) and tenderness on biting (secondary outcome) of patients’ asymptomatic molars. Methodology: This study protocol was registered with ReBec-WHO (U1111-1182-2800). From a pool of 112 patients evaluated for eligibility (healthy adults (≤18 years old)), with a single asymptomatic molar (maxillary or mandibular) indicated for root canal treatment, diagnosed with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis (including chronic hyperplastic pulpitis), 75 were randomly allocated in similar proportions to receive the intervention (two-appointment root canal therapy) in either the PTN or R group. The allocated procedures were performed using standardized protocols. Participants (blinded to the instrumentation technique) rated their pain intensity at 6, 12 and 24 h and from day 2 to day 7 following the root canal instrumentation appointment using a VAS and an NRS; the ibuprofen tablets taken and the presence of tenderness on biting were recorded. The instrumentation time was registered. Univariate and multivariate statistics measured the effect of independent variables on the outcomes. Results: From the 75 patients allocated, 8 patients (4 from each group) were lost; in total, 33 patients were analyzed in the PTN group and 34 in the R group. The frequencies of postoperative pain (p > 0.05) and tenderness on biting (p > 0.05) were similar between groups. The medication intake (mean of 1.31 tablets) and the time of instrumentation (approximately 11 min) were similar between groups. Conclusion: ProTaper Next and Reciproc(®) caused a slight risk of tenderness on biting and contributed to similar self-reported postoperative pain (low intensity) up to 7 days following root canal shaping. MDPI 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9267392/ /pubmed/35807101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133816 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Oliveira, Patrícia Santos
Ferreira, Meire Coelho
Paula, Natália Gomes Nascimento
Loguercio, Alessandro Dourado
Grazziotin-Soares, Renata
da Silva, Gisele Rodrigues
da Mata, Helena Cristina Santos
Bauer, José
Carvalho, Ceci Nunes
Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Instrumentation Using ProTaper Next or Reciproc in Asymptomatic Molars: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial
title Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Instrumentation Using ProTaper Next or Reciproc in Asymptomatic Molars: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial
title_full Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Instrumentation Using ProTaper Next or Reciproc in Asymptomatic Molars: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Instrumentation Using ProTaper Next or Reciproc in Asymptomatic Molars: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Instrumentation Using ProTaper Next or Reciproc in Asymptomatic Molars: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial
title_short Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Instrumentation Using ProTaper Next or Reciproc in Asymptomatic Molars: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial
title_sort postoperative pain following root canal instrumentation using protaper next or reciproc in asymptomatic molars: a randomized controlled single-blind clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807101
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133816
work_keys_str_mv AT oliveirapatriciasantos postoperativepainfollowingrootcanalinstrumentationusingprotapernextorreciprocinasymptomaticmolarsarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindclinicaltrial
AT ferreirameirecoelho postoperativepainfollowingrootcanalinstrumentationusingprotapernextorreciprocinasymptomaticmolarsarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindclinicaltrial
AT paulanataliagomesnascimento postoperativepainfollowingrootcanalinstrumentationusingprotapernextorreciprocinasymptomaticmolarsarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindclinicaltrial
AT loguercioalessandrodourado postoperativepainfollowingrootcanalinstrumentationusingprotapernextorreciprocinasymptomaticmolarsarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindclinicaltrial
AT grazziotinsoaresrenata postoperativepainfollowingrootcanalinstrumentationusingprotapernextorreciprocinasymptomaticmolarsarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindclinicaltrial
AT dasilvagiselerodrigues postoperativepainfollowingrootcanalinstrumentationusingprotapernextorreciprocinasymptomaticmolarsarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindclinicaltrial
AT damatahelenacristinasantos postoperativepainfollowingrootcanalinstrumentationusingprotapernextorreciprocinasymptomaticmolarsarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindclinicaltrial
AT bauerjose postoperativepainfollowingrootcanalinstrumentationusingprotapernextorreciprocinasymptomaticmolarsarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindclinicaltrial
AT carvalhocecinunes postoperativepainfollowingrootcanalinstrumentationusingprotapernextorreciprocinasymptomaticmolarsarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindclinicaltrial