Cargando…
Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Instrumentation Using ProTaper Next or Reciproc in Asymptomatic Molars: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial
Aim: The development of postoperative pain following root canal instrumentation may impair patient’s comfort and undermine their trust in the dentist. This study assessed the effect of root canal instrumentation techniques (rotary (PTN; ProTaper Next(®)) and reciprocating (R; Reciproc(®))) on the po...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133816 |
_version_ | 1784743708271312896 |
---|---|
author | Oliveira, Patrícia Santos Ferreira, Meire Coelho Paula, Natália Gomes Nascimento Loguercio, Alessandro Dourado Grazziotin-Soares, Renata da Silva, Gisele Rodrigues da Mata, Helena Cristina Santos Bauer, José Carvalho, Ceci Nunes |
author_facet | Oliveira, Patrícia Santos Ferreira, Meire Coelho Paula, Natália Gomes Nascimento Loguercio, Alessandro Dourado Grazziotin-Soares, Renata da Silva, Gisele Rodrigues da Mata, Helena Cristina Santos Bauer, José Carvalho, Ceci Nunes |
author_sort | Oliveira, Patrícia Santos |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim: The development of postoperative pain following root canal instrumentation may impair patient’s comfort and undermine their trust in the dentist. This study assessed the effect of root canal instrumentation techniques (rotary (PTN; ProTaper Next(®)) and reciprocating (R; Reciproc(®))) on the postoperative pain intensity (primary outcome) and tenderness on biting (secondary outcome) of patients’ asymptomatic molars. Methodology: This study protocol was registered with ReBec-WHO (U1111-1182-2800). From a pool of 112 patients evaluated for eligibility (healthy adults (≤18 years old)), with a single asymptomatic molar (maxillary or mandibular) indicated for root canal treatment, diagnosed with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis (including chronic hyperplastic pulpitis), 75 were randomly allocated in similar proportions to receive the intervention (two-appointment root canal therapy) in either the PTN or R group. The allocated procedures were performed using standardized protocols. Participants (blinded to the instrumentation technique) rated their pain intensity at 6, 12 and 24 h and from day 2 to day 7 following the root canal instrumentation appointment using a VAS and an NRS; the ibuprofen tablets taken and the presence of tenderness on biting were recorded. The instrumentation time was registered. Univariate and multivariate statistics measured the effect of independent variables on the outcomes. Results: From the 75 patients allocated, 8 patients (4 from each group) were lost; in total, 33 patients were analyzed in the PTN group and 34 in the R group. The frequencies of postoperative pain (p > 0.05) and tenderness on biting (p > 0.05) were similar between groups. The medication intake (mean of 1.31 tablets) and the time of instrumentation (approximately 11 min) were similar between groups. Conclusion: ProTaper Next and Reciproc(®) caused a slight risk of tenderness on biting and contributed to similar self-reported postoperative pain (low intensity) up to 7 days following root canal shaping. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9267392 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92673922022-07-09 Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Instrumentation Using ProTaper Next or Reciproc in Asymptomatic Molars: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial Oliveira, Patrícia Santos Ferreira, Meire Coelho Paula, Natália Gomes Nascimento Loguercio, Alessandro Dourado Grazziotin-Soares, Renata da Silva, Gisele Rodrigues da Mata, Helena Cristina Santos Bauer, José Carvalho, Ceci Nunes J Clin Med Article Aim: The development of postoperative pain following root canal instrumentation may impair patient’s comfort and undermine their trust in the dentist. This study assessed the effect of root canal instrumentation techniques (rotary (PTN; ProTaper Next(®)) and reciprocating (R; Reciproc(®))) on the postoperative pain intensity (primary outcome) and tenderness on biting (secondary outcome) of patients’ asymptomatic molars. Methodology: This study protocol was registered with ReBec-WHO (U1111-1182-2800). From a pool of 112 patients evaluated for eligibility (healthy adults (≤18 years old)), with a single asymptomatic molar (maxillary or mandibular) indicated for root canal treatment, diagnosed with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis (including chronic hyperplastic pulpitis), 75 were randomly allocated in similar proportions to receive the intervention (two-appointment root canal therapy) in either the PTN or R group. The allocated procedures were performed using standardized protocols. Participants (blinded to the instrumentation technique) rated their pain intensity at 6, 12 and 24 h and from day 2 to day 7 following the root canal instrumentation appointment using a VAS and an NRS; the ibuprofen tablets taken and the presence of tenderness on biting were recorded. The instrumentation time was registered. Univariate and multivariate statistics measured the effect of independent variables on the outcomes. Results: From the 75 patients allocated, 8 patients (4 from each group) were lost; in total, 33 patients were analyzed in the PTN group and 34 in the R group. The frequencies of postoperative pain (p > 0.05) and tenderness on biting (p > 0.05) were similar between groups. The medication intake (mean of 1.31 tablets) and the time of instrumentation (approximately 11 min) were similar between groups. Conclusion: ProTaper Next and Reciproc(®) caused a slight risk of tenderness on biting and contributed to similar self-reported postoperative pain (low intensity) up to 7 days following root canal shaping. MDPI 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9267392/ /pubmed/35807101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133816 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Oliveira, Patrícia Santos Ferreira, Meire Coelho Paula, Natália Gomes Nascimento Loguercio, Alessandro Dourado Grazziotin-Soares, Renata da Silva, Gisele Rodrigues da Mata, Helena Cristina Santos Bauer, José Carvalho, Ceci Nunes Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Instrumentation Using ProTaper Next or Reciproc in Asymptomatic Molars: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial |
title | Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Instrumentation Using ProTaper Next or Reciproc in Asymptomatic Molars: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial |
title_full | Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Instrumentation Using ProTaper Next or Reciproc in Asymptomatic Molars: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Instrumentation Using ProTaper Next or Reciproc in Asymptomatic Molars: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Instrumentation Using ProTaper Next or Reciproc in Asymptomatic Molars: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial |
title_short | Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Instrumentation Using ProTaper Next or Reciproc in Asymptomatic Molars: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial |
title_sort | postoperative pain following root canal instrumentation using protaper next or reciproc in asymptomatic molars: a randomized controlled single-blind clinical trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133816 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oliveirapatriciasantos postoperativepainfollowingrootcanalinstrumentationusingprotapernextorreciprocinasymptomaticmolarsarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindclinicaltrial AT ferreirameirecoelho postoperativepainfollowingrootcanalinstrumentationusingprotapernextorreciprocinasymptomaticmolarsarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindclinicaltrial AT paulanataliagomesnascimento postoperativepainfollowingrootcanalinstrumentationusingprotapernextorreciprocinasymptomaticmolarsarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindclinicaltrial AT loguercioalessandrodourado postoperativepainfollowingrootcanalinstrumentationusingprotapernextorreciprocinasymptomaticmolarsarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindclinicaltrial AT grazziotinsoaresrenata postoperativepainfollowingrootcanalinstrumentationusingprotapernextorreciprocinasymptomaticmolarsarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindclinicaltrial AT dasilvagiselerodrigues postoperativepainfollowingrootcanalinstrumentationusingprotapernextorreciprocinasymptomaticmolarsarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindclinicaltrial AT damatahelenacristinasantos postoperativepainfollowingrootcanalinstrumentationusingprotapernextorreciprocinasymptomaticmolarsarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindclinicaltrial AT bauerjose postoperativepainfollowingrootcanalinstrumentationusingprotapernextorreciprocinasymptomaticmolarsarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindclinicaltrial AT carvalhocecinunes postoperativepainfollowingrootcanalinstrumentationusingprotapernextorreciprocinasymptomaticmolarsarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindclinicaltrial |