Cargando…

Effects of Intensive Vibratory Treatment with a Robotic System on the Recovery of Sensation and Function in Patients with Subacute and Chronic Stroke: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Sensory–motor deficits are frequent and affect the functionality after stroke. The use of robotic systems to improve functionality and motor performance is advisable; therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of intensive, high-frequency vibration treatment admi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodríguez-Pérez, Mª Pilar, Sánchez-Herrera-Baeza, Patricia, Cano-de-la-Cuerda, Roberto, Camacho-Montaño, Lucía Rocío, Serrada-Tejeda, Sergio, Pérez-de-Heredia-Torres, Marta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35806854
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133572
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Sensory–motor deficits are frequent and affect the functionality after stroke. The use of robotic systems to improve functionality and motor performance is advisable; therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of intensive, high-frequency vibration treatment administered with a robotic system in subacute and chronic stroke patients in terms of upper limb sensitivity, motor function, quantity and quality of movement, and quality of life. Methods: A simple-blind, non-randomized controlled trial was conducted. The control group received conventional rehabilitation treatment and the experimental group received robotic treatment with an Amadeo(®) robot in addition to their conventional rehabilitation sessions. Results: Intragroup analysis identified significant improvements in the experimental group in hand (p = 0.012), arm (p = 0.018), and shoulder (p = 0.027) sensitivity, as well as in motor function (FMA-UEmotor function, p = 0.028), integration of the affected limb (MAL-14amount scale, p = 0.011; MAL-14How well scale, p = 0.008), and perceived quality of life (SIS-16, p = 0.008). The measures between the control and experimental groups showed statistically significant differences in motor performance and spontaneous use of the affected limb (MAL-14amount scale, p = 0.021; MAL-14How well scale, p = 0.037). Conclusions: Intensive, high-frequency vibration with a robotic system, in combination with conventional intervention, improves the recovery of upper limb function in terms of quantity and quality of movement in patients with subacute and chronic stroke.