Cargando…

Techniques of Primary Vaginoplasty in Young Adults with Differences of Sex Development and Female Identification

Background: The ideal timing of genital surgery in differences/disorders of sex development (DSD) is controversial and differs according to the underlying type of DSD. Increasing numbers of persisting sinus as a result of delayed feminizing genitoplasty in DSD patients require interdisciplinary coll...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ellerkamp, Verena, Rall, Kristin Katharina, Schaefer, Juergen, Brucker, Sara, Fuchs, Joerg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35806974
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133688
Descripción
Sumario:Background: The ideal timing of genital surgery in differences/disorders of sex development (DSD) is controversial and differs according to the underlying type of DSD. Increasing numbers of persisting sinus as a result of delayed feminizing genitoplasty in DSD patients require interdisciplinary collaboration of pediatric surgeons/urologists and gynecologists. This study focusses on surgical techniques other than bowel vaginoplasties and results of gender assigning surgery in young adolescents. Methods: Data of adolescent and adult patients treated between 2015 and 2022 were analyzed retrospectively: underlying type of malformation, techniques of vaginoplasty, vaginal length and caliber, possibility of sexual intercourse, and temporary vaginal dilatation. Results: A total of 9 patients received a primary vaginoplasty at a median age of 16.75 years (range 10.3–29.25). The underlying anatomical conditions were persistent urogenital sinus (UGS) in 8 patients (3 patients with CAH, 2 patients with XY-DSD, 1 patient with cloacal malformation and missed UGS, 2 patients with UGS only). One patient had a MURCS association. Surgical techniques were total urogenital mobilization and perineal flap vaginoplasty in 4 patients, modified McIndoe vaginoplasty in 4 patients, and a laparoscopic vaginal pull-through in 1 patient. In a median follow-up of 45 months (2–84), all but 1 patient presented with physiological vaginal length and width. Conclusions: If possible, modern treatment concepts delay gender assigning surgery until the participation of the patient in the decision-making process is possible. Optimal treatment concepts are given by transfer of surgical techniques from pediatric urology/surgery by multidisciplinary teams. Techniques other than bowel vaginoplasties are favorable.