Cargando…

3-Year Clinical Performance of a New Pit and Fissure Sealant

The aim of this 3-year, randomized clinical trial (RCT) in split-mouth design was to explore the clinical survival of a Bis-GMA-free pit and fissure sealant (Helioseal F Plus) in comparison to a control material (Helioseal F). The initial population consisted of 92 adolescents. Follow-ups took place...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schill, Helen, Gräser, Peter, Bücher, Katharina, Pfisterer, Jan, Khazaei, Yeganeh, Enggist, Lukas, Hickel, Reinhard, Kühnisch, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807023
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133741
_version_ 1784743749530681344
author Schill, Helen
Gräser, Peter
Bücher, Katharina
Pfisterer, Jan
Khazaei, Yeganeh
Enggist, Lukas
Hickel, Reinhard
Kühnisch, Jan
author_facet Schill, Helen
Gräser, Peter
Bücher, Katharina
Pfisterer, Jan
Khazaei, Yeganeh
Enggist, Lukas
Hickel, Reinhard
Kühnisch, Jan
author_sort Schill, Helen
collection PubMed
description The aim of this 3-year, randomized clinical trial (RCT) in split-mouth design was to explore the clinical survival of a Bis-GMA-free pit and fissure sealant (Helioseal F Plus) in comparison to a control material (Helioseal F). The initial population consisted of 92 adolescents. Follow-ups took place after one year (N = 85), two years (N = 82) and three years (N = 76) after application. At each examination, sealant retention and the presence of caries were recorded. The statistical analysis included the calculation of Kaplan–Meier survival curves, log-rank tests and a Cox proportional hazard regression model. No adverse events were documented. The proportion of completely intact sealants and those with minimal loss was almost identical in both groups, at 84.3% (Helioseal F; 113/134) and 81.7% (Helioseal F Plus; 107/131) after three years of observation. The regression analysis revealed an operator dependency, but no significant differences were found between the materials, the study centers, the chosen isolation technique, patient age or sex. After 3 years, 91.7% and 100.0% of all molars were free of non-cavitated carious lesions or carious cavities, respectively. It can be concluded that the new fissure sealing material can be considered as at least equivalent in terms of survival and retention behavior compared to the predecessor material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9267564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92675642022-07-09 3-Year Clinical Performance of a New Pit and Fissure Sealant Schill, Helen Gräser, Peter Bücher, Katharina Pfisterer, Jan Khazaei, Yeganeh Enggist, Lukas Hickel, Reinhard Kühnisch, Jan J Clin Med Article The aim of this 3-year, randomized clinical trial (RCT) in split-mouth design was to explore the clinical survival of a Bis-GMA-free pit and fissure sealant (Helioseal F Plus) in comparison to a control material (Helioseal F). The initial population consisted of 92 adolescents. Follow-ups took place after one year (N = 85), two years (N = 82) and three years (N = 76) after application. At each examination, sealant retention and the presence of caries were recorded. The statistical analysis included the calculation of Kaplan–Meier survival curves, log-rank tests and a Cox proportional hazard regression model. No adverse events were documented. The proportion of completely intact sealants and those with minimal loss was almost identical in both groups, at 84.3% (Helioseal F; 113/134) and 81.7% (Helioseal F Plus; 107/131) after three years of observation. The regression analysis revealed an operator dependency, but no significant differences were found between the materials, the study centers, the chosen isolation technique, patient age or sex. After 3 years, 91.7% and 100.0% of all molars were free of non-cavitated carious lesions or carious cavities, respectively. It can be concluded that the new fissure sealing material can be considered as at least equivalent in terms of survival and retention behavior compared to the predecessor material. MDPI 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9267564/ /pubmed/35807023 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133741 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schill, Helen
Gräser, Peter
Bücher, Katharina
Pfisterer, Jan
Khazaei, Yeganeh
Enggist, Lukas
Hickel, Reinhard
Kühnisch, Jan
3-Year Clinical Performance of a New Pit and Fissure Sealant
title 3-Year Clinical Performance of a New Pit and Fissure Sealant
title_full 3-Year Clinical Performance of a New Pit and Fissure Sealant
title_fullStr 3-Year Clinical Performance of a New Pit and Fissure Sealant
title_full_unstemmed 3-Year Clinical Performance of a New Pit and Fissure Sealant
title_short 3-Year Clinical Performance of a New Pit and Fissure Sealant
title_sort 3-year clinical performance of a new pit and fissure sealant
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807023
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133741
work_keys_str_mv AT schillhelen 3yearclinicalperformanceofanewpitandfissuresealant
AT graserpeter 3yearclinicalperformanceofanewpitandfissuresealant
AT bucherkatharina 3yearclinicalperformanceofanewpitandfissuresealant
AT pfistererjan 3yearclinicalperformanceofanewpitandfissuresealant
AT khazaeiyeganeh 3yearclinicalperformanceofanewpitandfissuresealant
AT enggistlukas 3yearclinicalperformanceofanewpitandfissuresealant
AT hickelreinhard 3yearclinicalperformanceofanewpitandfissuresealant
AT kuhnischjan 3yearclinicalperformanceofanewpitandfissuresealant