Cargando…
3-Year Clinical Performance of a New Pit and Fissure Sealant
The aim of this 3-year, randomized clinical trial (RCT) in split-mouth design was to explore the clinical survival of a Bis-GMA-free pit and fissure sealant (Helioseal F Plus) in comparison to a control material (Helioseal F). The initial population consisted of 92 adolescents. Follow-ups took place...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807023 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133741 |
_version_ | 1784743749530681344 |
---|---|
author | Schill, Helen Gräser, Peter Bücher, Katharina Pfisterer, Jan Khazaei, Yeganeh Enggist, Lukas Hickel, Reinhard Kühnisch, Jan |
author_facet | Schill, Helen Gräser, Peter Bücher, Katharina Pfisterer, Jan Khazaei, Yeganeh Enggist, Lukas Hickel, Reinhard Kühnisch, Jan |
author_sort | Schill, Helen |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this 3-year, randomized clinical trial (RCT) in split-mouth design was to explore the clinical survival of a Bis-GMA-free pit and fissure sealant (Helioseal F Plus) in comparison to a control material (Helioseal F). The initial population consisted of 92 adolescents. Follow-ups took place after one year (N = 85), two years (N = 82) and three years (N = 76) after application. At each examination, sealant retention and the presence of caries were recorded. The statistical analysis included the calculation of Kaplan–Meier survival curves, log-rank tests and a Cox proportional hazard regression model. No adverse events were documented. The proportion of completely intact sealants and those with minimal loss was almost identical in both groups, at 84.3% (Helioseal F; 113/134) and 81.7% (Helioseal F Plus; 107/131) after three years of observation. The regression analysis revealed an operator dependency, but no significant differences were found between the materials, the study centers, the chosen isolation technique, patient age or sex. After 3 years, 91.7% and 100.0% of all molars were free of non-cavitated carious lesions or carious cavities, respectively. It can be concluded that the new fissure sealing material can be considered as at least equivalent in terms of survival and retention behavior compared to the predecessor material. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9267564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92675642022-07-09 3-Year Clinical Performance of a New Pit and Fissure Sealant Schill, Helen Gräser, Peter Bücher, Katharina Pfisterer, Jan Khazaei, Yeganeh Enggist, Lukas Hickel, Reinhard Kühnisch, Jan J Clin Med Article The aim of this 3-year, randomized clinical trial (RCT) in split-mouth design was to explore the clinical survival of a Bis-GMA-free pit and fissure sealant (Helioseal F Plus) in comparison to a control material (Helioseal F). The initial population consisted of 92 adolescents. Follow-ups took place after one year (N = 85), two years (N = 82) and three years (N = 76) after application. At each examination, sealant retention and the presence of caries were recorded. The statistical analysis included the calculation of Kaplan–Meier survival curves, log-rank tests and a Cox proportional hazard regression model. No adverse events were documented. The proportion of completely intact sealants and those with minimal loss was almost identical in both groups, at 84.3% (Helioseal F; 113/134) and 81.7% (Helioseal F Plus; 107/131) after three years of observation. The regression analysis revealed an operator dependency, but no significant differences were found between the materials, the study centers, the chosen isolation technique, patient age or sex. After 3 years, 91.7% and 100.0% of all molars were free of non-cavitated carious lesions or carious cavities, respectively. It can be concluded that the new fissure sealing material can be considered as at least equivalent in terms of survival and retention behavior compared to the predecessor material. MDPI 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9267564/ /pubmed/35807023 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133741 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Schill, Helen Gräser, Peter Bücher, Katharina Pfisterer, Jan Khazaei, Yeganeh Enggist, Lukas Hickel, Reinhard Kühnisch, Jan 3-Year Clinical Performance of a New Pit and Fissure Sealant |
title | 3-Year Clinical Performance of a New Pit and Fissure Sealant |
title_full | 3-Year Clinical Performance of a New Pit and Fissure Sealant |
title_fullStr | 3-Year Clinical Performance of a New Pit and Fissure Sealant |
title_full_unstemmed | 3-Year Clinical Performance of a New Pit and Fissure Sealant |
title_short | 3-Year Clinical Performance of a New Pit and Fissure Sealant |
title_sort | 3-year clinical performance of a new pit and fissure sealant |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807023 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133741 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schillhelen 3yearclinicalperformanceofanewpitandfissuresealant AT graserpeter 3yearclinicalperformanceofanewpitandfissuresealant AT bucherkatharina 3yearclinicalperformanceofanewpitandfissuresealant AT pfistererjan 3yearclinicalperformanceofanewpitandfissuresealant AT khazaeiyeganeh 3yearclinicalperformanceofanewpitandfissuresealant AT enggistlukas 3yearclinicalperformanceofanewpitandfissuresealant AT hickelreinhard 3yearclinicalperformanceofanewpitandfissuresealant AT kuhnischjan 3yearclinicalperformanceofanewpitandfissuresealant |