Cargando…
Optic Nerve Drusen Evaluation: A Comparison between Ultrasound and OCT
This observational study compared optic coherence tomography (OCT) and B-scan in the detection of optic disc drusen. In total, 86 eyes of 50 patients with optic disc drusen (ODD) (36 bilateral) with a mean age of 34.68 ± 23.81 years, and 54 eyes of 27 patients with papilledema, with a mean age of 35...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35806999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133715 |
_version_ | 1784743808524615680 |
---|---|
author | Rosa, Nicola De Bernardo, Maddalena Abbinante, Giulia Vecchio, Gianluca Cione, Ferdinando Capasso, Luigi |
author_facet | Rosa, Nicola De Bernardo, Maddalena Abbinante, Giulia Vecchio, Gianluca Cione, Ferdinando Capasso, Luigi |
author_sort | Rosa, Nicola |
collection | PubMed |
description | This observational study compared optic coherence tomography (OCT) and B-scan in the detection of optic disc drusen. In total, 86 eyes of 50 patients with optic disc drusen (ODD) (36 bilateral) with a mean age of 34.68 ± 23.81 years, and 54 eyes of 27 patients with papilledema, with a mean age of 35.42 years ± 17.47, were examined. Patients with ODD, diagnosed with ultrasound, underwent spectral-domain OCT evaluation. With US, 28 ODD cases were classified as large (4 buried and 24 superficial), 58 were classified as point-like (6 buried, 49 superficial and 3 mixed). Then, all patients underwent OCT. OCT was able to detect the presence of ODD and/or peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass structure (PHOMS) in 69 eyes (p < 0.001). In particular, 7 eyes (8.14%) showed the presence of ODD alone, 25 eyes (29.07%) showed only PHOMS and 37 eyes (43.02%) showed ODD and PHOMS. In 17 eyes (19.77%) no ODD or PHOMS were detected. In the papilledema group, no ODD were observed with both US and OCT. OCT showed the presence of drusen or similar lesions in only 80.23% of the cases highlighted by the US scan, so it does not allow for certain ODD diagnoses, especially in the case of buried ODD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9267746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92677462022-07-09 Optic Nerve Drusen Evaluation: A Comparison between Ultrasound and OCT Rosa, Nicola De Bernardo, Maddalena Abbinante, Giulia Vecchio, Gianluca Cione, Ferdinando Capasso, Luigi J Clin Med Article This observational study compared optic coherence tomography (OCT) and B-scan in the detection of optic disc drusen. In total, 86 eyes of 50 patients with optic disc drusen (ODD) (36 bilateral) with a mean age of 34.68 ± 23.81 years, and 54 eyes of 27 patients with papilledema, with a mean age of 35.42 years ± 17.47, were examined. Patients with ODD, diagnosed with ultrasound, underwent spectral-domain OCT evaluation. With US, 28 ODD cases were classified as large (4 buried and 24 superficial), 58 were classified as point-like (6 buried, 49 superficial and 3 mixed). Then, all patients underwent OCT. OCT was able to detect the presence of ODD and/or peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass structure (PHOMS) in 69 eyes (p < 0.001). In particular, 7 eyes (8.14%) showed the presence of ODD alone, 25 eyes (29.07%) showed only PHOMS and 37 eyes (43.02%) showed ODD and PHOMS. In 17 eyes (19.77%) no ODD or PHOMS were detected. In the papilledema group, no ODD were observed with both US and OCT. OCT showed the presence of drusen or similar lesions in only 80.23% of the cases highlighted by the US scan, so it does not allow for certain ODD diagnoses, especially in the case of buried ODD. MDPI 2022-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9267746/ /pubmed/35806999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133715 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rosa, Nicola De Bernardo, Maddalena Abbinante, Giulia Vecchio, Gianluca Cione, Ferdinando Capasso, Luigi Optic Nerve Drusen Evaluation: A Comparison between Ultrasound and OCT |
title | Optic Nerve Drusen Evaluation: A Comparison between Ultrasound and OCT |
title_full | Optic Nerve Drusen Evaluation: A Comparison between Ultrasound and OCT |
title_fullStr | Optic Nerve Drusen Evaluation: A Comparison between Ultrasound and OCT |
title_full_unstemmed | Optic Nerve Drusen Evaluation: A Comparison between Ultrasound and OCT |
title_short | Optic Nerve Drusen Evaluation: A Comparison between Ultrasound and OCT |
title_sort | optic nerve drusen evaluation: a comparison between ultrasound and oct |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35806999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133715 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosanicola opticnervedrusenevaluationacomparisonbetweenultrasoundandoct AT debernardomaddalena opticnervedrusenevaluationacomparisonbetweenultrasoundandoct AT abbinantegiulia opticnervedrusenevaluationacomparisonbetweenultrasoundandoct AT vecchiogianluca opticnervedrusenevaluationacomparisonbetweenultrasoundandoct AT cioneferdinando opticnervedrusenevaluationacomparisonbetweenultrasoundandoct AT capassoluigi opticnervedrusenevaluationacomparisonbetweenultrasoundandoct |