Cargando…

Positive Effect of Manipulated Virtual Kinematic Intervention in Individuals with Traumatic Stiff Shoulder: A Pilot Study

Virtual reality enables the manipulation of a patient’s perception, providing additional motivation to real-time biofeedback exercises. We aimed to test the effect of manipulated virtual kinematic intervention on measures of active and passive range of motion (ROM), pain, and disability level in ind...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwartz, Isabella, Safran, Ori, Karniel, Naama, Abel, Michal, Berko, Adina, Seyres, Martin, Tsoar, Tamir, Portnoy, Sigal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807205
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133919
_version_ 1784743812741988352
author Schwartz, Isabella
Safran, Ori
Karniel, Naama
Abel, Michal
Berko, Adina
Seyres, Martin
Tsoar, Tamir
Portnoy, Sigal
author_facet Schwartz, Isabella
Safran, Ori
Karniel, Naama
Abel, Michal
Berko, Adina
Seyres, Martin
Tsoar, Tamir
Portnoy, Sigal
author_sort Schwartz, Isabella
collection PubMed
description Virtual reality enables the manipulation of a patient’s perception, providing additional motivation to real-time biofeedback exercises. We aimed to test the effect of manipulated virtual kinematic intervention on measures of active and passive range of motion (ROM), pain, and disability level in individuals with traumatic stiff shoulder. In a double-blinded study, patients with stiff shoulder following proximal humerus fracture and non-operative treatment were randomly divided into a non-manipulated feedback group (NM-group; n = 6) and a manipulated feedback group (M-group; n = 7). The shoulder ROM, pain, and disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) scores were tested at baseline and after 6 sessions, during which the subjects performed shoulder flexion and abduction in front of a graphic visualization of the shoulder angle. The biofeedback provided to the NM-group was the actual shoulder angle while the feedback provided to the M-group was manipulated so that 10° were constantly subtracted from the actual angle detected by the motion capture system. The M-group showed greater improvement in the active flexion ROM (p = 0.046) and DASH scores (p = 0.022). While both groups improved following the real-time virtual feedback intervention, the manipulated intervention provided to the M-group was more beneficial in individuals with traumatic stiff shoulder and should be further tested in other populations with orthopedic injuries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9267763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92677632022-07-09 Positive Effect of Manipulated Virtual Kinematic Intervention in Individuals with Traumatic Stiff Shoulder: A Pilot Study Schwartz, Isabella Safran, Ori Karniel, Naama Abel, Michal Berko, Adina Seyres, Martin Tsoar, Tamir Portnoy, Sigal J Clin Med Article Virtual reality enables the manipulation of a patient’s perception, providing additional motivation to real-time biofeedback exercises. We aimed to test the effect of manipulated virtual kinematic intervention on measures of active and passive range of motion (ROM), pain, and disability level in individuals with traumatic stiff shoulder. In a double-blinded study, patients with stiff shoulder following proximal humerus fracture and non-operative treatment were randomly divided into a non-manipulated feedback group (NM-group; n = 6) and a manipulated feedback group (M-group; n = 7). The shoulder ROM, pain, and disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) scores were tested at baseline and after 6 sessions, during which the subjects performed shoulder flexion and abduction in front of a graphic visualization of the shoulder angle. The biofeedback provided to the NM-group was the actual shoulder angle while the feedback provided to the M-group was manipulated so that 10° were constantly subtracted from the actual angle detected by the motion capture system. The M-group showed greater improvement in the active flexion ROM (p = 0.046) and DASH scores (p = 0.022). While both groups improved following the real-time virtual feedback intervention, the manipulated intervention provided to the M-group was more beneficial in individuals with traumatic stiff shoulder and should be further tested in other populations with orthopedic injuries. MDPI 2022-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9267763/ /pubmed/35807205 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133919 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schwartz, Isabella
Safran, Ori
Karniel, Naama
Abel, Michal
Berko, Adina
Seyres, Martin
Tsoar, Tamir
Portnoy, Sigal
Positive Effect of Manipulated Virtual Kinematic Intervention in Individuals with Traumatic Stiff Shoulder: A Pilot Study
title Positive Effect of Manipulated Virtual Kinematic Intervention in Individuals with Traumatic Stiff Shoulder: A Pilot Study
title_full Positive Effect of Manipulated Virtual Kinematic Intervention in Individuals with Traumatic Stiff Shoulder: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Positive Effect of Manipulated Virtual Kinematic Intervention in Individuals with Traumatic Stiff Shoulder: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Positive Effect of Manipulated Virtual Kinematic Intervention in Individuals with Traumatic Stiff Shoulder: A Pilot Study
title_short Positive Effect of Manipulated Virtual Kinematic Intervention in Individuals with Traumatic Stiff Shoulder: A Pilot Study
title_sort positive effect of manipulated virtual kinematic intervention in individuals with traumatic stiff shoulder: a pilot study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807205
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133919
work_keys_str_mv AT schwartzisabella positiveeffectofmanipulatedvirtualkinematicinterventioninindividualswithtraumaticstiffshoulderapilotstudy
AT safranori positiveeffectofmanipulatedvirtualkinematicinterventioninindividualswithtraumaticstiffshoulderapilotstudy
AT karnielnaama positiveeffectofmanipulatedvirtualkinematicinterventioninindividualswithtraumaticstiffshoulderapilotstudy
AT abelmichal positiveeffectofmanipulatedvirtualkinematicinterventioninindividualswithtraumaticstiffshoulderapilotstudy
AT berkoadina positiveeffectofmanipulatedvirtualkinematicinterventioninindividualswithtraumaticstiffshoulderapilotstudy
AT seyresmartin positiveeffectofmanipulatedvirtualkinematicinterventioninindividualswithtraumaticstiffshoulderapilotstudy
AT tsoartamir positiveeffectofmanipulatedvirtualkinematicinterventioninindividualswithtraumaticstiffshoulderapilotstudy
AT portnoysigal positiveeffectofmanipulatedvirtualkinematicinterventioninindividualswithtraumaticstiffshoulderapilotstudy