Cargando…

Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is widely used to restore knee stability after injury, but the risk of revision surgery increases when the autograft size is inadequate. Ultrasound (US) measurements of preoperative target tendons have been applied to predict the intraoperative autogra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Tsung-Min, Wu, Wei-Ting, Chiu, Yi-Hsiang, Chang, Ke-Vin, Özçakar, Levent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807157
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133876
_version_ 1784743819618549760
author Lee, Tsung-Min
Wu, Wei-Ting
Chiu, Yi-Hsiang
Chang, Ke-Vin
Özçakar, Levent
author_facet Lee, Tsung-Min
Wu, Wei-Ting
Chiu, Yi-Hsiang
Chang, Ke-Vin
Özçakar, Levent
author_sort Lee, Tsung-Min
collection PubMed
description Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is widely used to restore knee stability after injury, but the risk of revision surgery increases when the autograft size is inadequate. Ultrasound (US) measurements of preoperative target tendons have been applied to predict the intraoperative autograft size, with various outcomes across different studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the evidence and investigate the usefulness of US in predicting autograft size. Electronic databases were searched for relevant studies from inception to 19 January 2022. The primary outcome was the correlation between the preoperative US measurements of donor tendons and intraoperative autograft size. The secondary outcomes encompassed the predictive performance of US for autograft size and the comparison between US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for preoperative tendon measurements. Nine studies, comprising 249 patients, were enrolled. The preoperative US measurements of the donor tendons demonstrated a significant positive correlation with their intraoperative autograft diameter, with a pooled correlation coefficient of 0.443 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.266–0.591, p < 0.001) for the gracilis and semitendinosus autograft, 0.525 (95% CI, 0.114–0.783, p = 0.015) for the semitendinosus autograft, and 0.475 (95% CI, 0.187–0.687, p = 0.002) for the gracilis autograft. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of US imaging in predicting the autograft diameter were 0.83 (95% CI 0.57–0.95) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.36–0.91), respectively. Moreover, no significant differences were observed between US and MRI measurements in predicting the sizes of the gracilis and semitendinosus autografts. Preoperative US measurements of the target tendons were moderately correlated with the intraoperative autograft size. US imaging has a discriminative performance similar to that of MRI in predicting the autograft size. A standardized US scanning protocol is needed for future studies to minimize the variations in tendon measurements across different investigators and increase the comparability of US imaging with intraoperative findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9267791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92677912022-07-09 Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Lee, Tsung-Min Wu, Wei-Ting Chiu, Yi-Hsiang Chang, Ke-Vin Özçakar, Levent J Clin Med Systematic Review Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is widely used to restore knee stability after injury, but the risk of revision surgery increases when the autograft size is inadequate. Ultrasound (US) measurements of preoperative target tendons have been applied to predict the intraoperative autograft size, with various outcomes across different studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the evidence and investigate the usefulness of US in predicting autograft size. Electronic databases were searched for relevant studies from inception to 19 January 2022. The primary outcome was the correlation between the preoperative US measurements of donor tendons and intraoperative autograft size. The secondary outcomes encompassed the predictive performance of US for autograft size and the comparison between US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for preoperative tendon measurements. Nine studies, comprising 249 patients, were enrolled. The preoperative US measurements of the donor tendons demonstrated a significant positive correlation with their intraoperative autograft diameter, with a pooled correlation coefficient of 0.443 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.266–0.591, p < 0.001) for the gracilis and semitendinosus autograft, 0.525 (95% CI, 0.114–0.783, p = 0.015) for the semitendinosus autograft, and 0.475 (95% CI, 0.187–0.687, p = 0.002) for the gracilis autograft. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of US imaging in predicting the autograft diameter were 0.83 (95% CI 0.57–0.95) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.36–0.91), respectively. Moreover, no significant differences were observed between US and MRI measurements in predicting the sizes of the gracilis and semitendinosus autografts. Preoperative US measurements of the target tendons were moderately correlated with the intraoperative autograft size. US imaging has a discriminative performance similar to that of MRI in predicting the autograft size. A standardized US scanning protocol is needed for future studies to minimize the variations in tendon measurements across different investigators and increase the comparability of US imaging with intraoperative findings. MDPI 2022-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9267791/ /pubmed/35807157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133876 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Lee, Tsung-Min
Wu, Wei-Ting
Chiu, Yi-Hsiang
Chang, Ke-Vin
Özçakar, Levent
Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort ultrasound imaging in predicting the autograft size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807157
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133876
work_keys_str_mv AT leetsungmin ultrasoundimaginginpredictingtheautograftsizeinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuweiting ultrasoundimaginginpredictingtheautograftsizeinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chiuyihsiang ultrasoundimaginginpredictingtheautograftsizeinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT changkevin ultrasoundimaginginpredictingtheautograftsizeinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ozcakarlevent ultrasoundimaginginpredictingtheautograftsizeinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis