Cargando…
Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is widely used to restore knee stability after injury, but the risk of revision surgery increases when the autograft size is inadequate. Ultrasound (US) measurements of preoperative target tendons have been applied to predict the intraoperative autogra...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133876 |
_version_ | 1784743819618549760 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Tsung-Min Wu, Wei-Ting Chiu, Yi-Hsiang Chang, Ke-Vin Özçakar, Levent |
author_facet | Lee, Tsung-Min Wu, Wei-Ting Chiu, Yi-Hsiang Chang, Ke-Vin Özçakar, Levent |
author_sort | Lee, Tsung-Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is widely used to restore knee stability after injury, but the risk of revision surgery increases when the autograft size is inadequate. Ultrasound (US) measurements of preoperative target tendons have been applied to predict the intraoperative autograft size, with various outcomes across different studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the evidence and investigate the usefulness of US in predicting autograft size. Electronic databases were searched for relevant studies from inception to 19 January 2022. The primary outcome was the correlation between the preoperative US measurements of donor tendons and intraoperative autograft size. The secondary outcomes encompassed the predictive performance of US for autograft size and the comparison between US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for preoperative tendon measurements. Nine studies, comprising 249 patients, were enrolled. The preoperative US measurements of the donor tendons demonstrated a significant positive correlation with their intraoperative autograft diameter, with a pooled correlation coefficient of 0.443 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.266–0.591, p < 0.001) for the gracilis and semitendinosus autograft, 0.525 (95% CI, 0.114–0.783, p = 0.015) for the semitendinosus autograft, and 0.475 (95% CI, 0.187–0.687, p = 0.002) for the gracilis autograft. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of US imaging in predicting the autograft diameter were 0.83 (95% CI 0.57–0.95) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.36–0.91), respectively. Moreover, no significant differences were observed between US and MRI measurements in predicting the sizes of the gracilis and semitendinosus autografts. Preoperative US measurements of the target tendons were moderately correlated with the intraoperative autograft size. US imaging has a discriminative performance similar to that of MRI in predicting the autograft size. A standardized US scanning protocol is needed for future studies to minimize the variations in tendon measurements across different investigators and increase the comparability of US imaging with intraoperative findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9267791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92677912022-07-09 Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Lee, Tsung-Min Wu, Wei-Ting Chiu, Yi-Hsiang Chang, Ke-Vin Özçakar, Levent J Clin Med Systematic Review Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is widely used to restore knee stability after injury, but the risk of revision surgery increases when the autograft size is inadequate. Ultrasound (US) measurements of preoperative target tendons have been applied to predict the intraoperative autograft size, with various outcomes across different studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the evidence and investigate the usefulness of US in predicting autograft size. Electronic databases were searched for relevant studies from inception to 19 January 2022. The primary outcome was the correlation between the preoperative US measurements of donor tendons and intraoperative autograft size. The secondary outcomes encompassed the predictive performance of US for autograft size and the comparison between US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for preoperative tendon measurements. Nine studies, comprising 249 patients, were enrolled. The preoperative US measurements of the donor tendons demonstrated a significant positive correlation with their intraoperative autograft diameter, with a pooled correlation coefficient of 0.443 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.266–0.591, p < 0.001) for the gracilis and semitendinosus autograft, 0.525 (95% CI, 0.114–0.783, p = 0.015) for the semitendinosus autograft, and 0.475 (95% CI, 0.187–0.687, p = 0.002) for the gracilis autograft. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of US imaging in predicting the autograft diameter were 0.83 (95% CI 0.57–0.95) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.36–0.91), respectively. Moreover, no significant differences were observed between US and MRI measurements in predicting the sizes of the gracilis and semitendinosus autografts. Preoperative US measurements of the target tendons were moderately correlated with the intraoperative autograft size. US imaging has a discriminative performance similar to that of MRI in predicting the autograft size. A standardized US scanning protocol is needed for future studies to minimize the variations in tendon measurements across different investigators and increase the comparability of US imaging with intraoperative findings. MDPI 2022-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9267791/ /pubmed/35807157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133876 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Lee, Tsung-Min Wu, Wei-Ting Chiu, Yi-Hsiang Chang, Ke-Vin Özçakar, Levent Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | ultrasound imaging in predicting the autograft size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133876 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leetsungmin ultrasoundimaginginpredictingtheautograftsizeinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wuweiting ultrasoundimaginginpredictingtheautograftsizeinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chiuyihsiang ultrasoundimaginginpredictingtheautograftsizeinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT changkevin ultrasoundimaginginpredictingtheautograftsizeinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ozcakarlevent ultrasoundimaginginpredictingtheautograftsizeinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |