Cargando…
The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review
The aim of this study was to have updated scrutiny of the influence of the humeral neck-shaft angle (HNSA) in patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A PRISMA-guided literature search was conducted from May to September 2021. Clinical outcome scores, functional parameters, and an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35806927 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133641 |
_version_ | 1784743853773815808 |
---|---|
author | Longo, Umile Giuseppe Gulotta, Lawrence V. De Salvatore, Sergio Berton, Alessandra Piergentili, Ilaria Bandini, Benedetta Lalli, Alberto Denaro, Vincenzo |
author_facet | Longo, Umile Giuseppe Gulotta, Lawrence V. De Salvatore, Sergio Berton, Alessandra Piergentili, Ilaria Bandini, Benedetta Lalli, Alberto Denaro, Vincenzo |
author_sort | Longo, Umile Giuseppe |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to have updated scrutiny of the influence of the humeral neck-shaft angle (HNSA) in patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A PRISMA-guided literature search was conducted from May to September 2021. Clinical outcome scores, functional parameters, and any complications were reviewed. Eleven papers were identified for inclusion in this systematic review. A total of 971 shoulders were evaluated at a minimum-follow up of 12 months, and a maximum of 120 months. The sample size for the “HNSA 155°” group is 449 patients, the “HNSA 145°” group involves 140 patients, and the “HSNA 135°” group comprises 291 patients. The HNSA represents an important variable in choosing the RSA implant design for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy. Positive outcomes are described for all the 155°, 145°, and 135° HSNA groups. Among the different implant designs, the 155° group show a better SST score, but also the highest rate of revisions and scapular notching; the 145° cohort achieve the best values in terms of active forward flexion, abduction, ASES score, and CMS, but also the highest rate of infections; while the 135° design obtains the best results in the external rotation with arm at side, but also the highest rate of fractures. High-quality studies are required to obtain valid results regarding the best prosthesis implant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9267919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92679192022-07-09 The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review Longo, Umile Giuseppe Gulotta, Lawrence V. De Salvatore, Sergio Berton, Alessandra Piergentili, Ilaria Bandini, Benedetta Lalli, Alberto Denaro, Vincenzo J Clin Med Review The aim of this study was to have updated scrutiny of the influence of the humeral neck-shaft angle (HNSA) in patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A PRISMA-guided literature search was conducted from May to September 2021. Clinical outcome scores, functional parameters, and any complications were reviewed. Eleven papers were identified for inclusion in this systematic review. A total of 971 shoulders were evaluated at a minimum-follow up of 12 months, and a maximum of 120 months. The sample size for the “HNSA 155°” group is 449 patients, the “HNSA 145°” group involves 140 patients, and the “HSNA 135°” group comprises 291 patients. The HNSA represents an important variable in choosing the RSA implant design for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy. Positive outcomes are described for all the 155°, 145°, and 135° HSNA groups. Among the different implant designs, the 155° group show a better SST score, but also the highest rate of revisions and scapular notching; the 145° cohort achieve the best values in terms of active forward flexion, abduction, ASES score, and CMS, but also the highest rate of infections; while the 135° design obtains the best results in the external rotation with arm at side, but also the highest rate of fractures. High-quality studies are required to obtain valid results regarding the best prosthesis implant. MDPI 2022-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9267919/ /pubmed/35806927 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133641 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Longo, Umile Giuseppe Gulotta, Lawrence V. De Salvatore, Sergio Berton, Alessandra Piergentili, Ilaria Bandini, Benedetta Lalli, Alberto Denaro, Vincenzo The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review |
title | The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review |
title_full | The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review |
title_short | The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review |
title_sort | role of humeral neck-shaft angle in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35806927 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133641 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT longoumilegiuseppe theroleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview AT gulottalawrencev theroleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview AT desalvatoresergio theroleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview AT bertonalessandra theroleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview AT piergentiliilaria theroleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview AT bandinibenedetta theroleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview AT lallialberto theroleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview AT denarovincenzo theroleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview AT longoumilegiuseppe roleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview AT gulottalawrencev roleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview AT desalvatoresergio roleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview AT bertonalessandra roleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview AT piergentiliilaria roleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview AT bandinibenedetta roleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview AT lallialberto roleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview AT denarovincenzo roleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview |