Cargando…

The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review

The aim of this study was to have updated scrutiny of the influence of the humeral neck-shaft angle (HNSA) in patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A PRISMA-guided literature search was conducted from May to September 2021. Clinical outcome scores, functional parameters, and an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Longo, Umile Giuseppe, Gulotta, Lawrence V., De Salvatore, Sergio, Berton, Alessandra, Piergentili, Ilaria, Bandini, Benedetta, Lalli, Alberto, Denaro, Vincenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35806927
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133641
_version_ 1784743853773815808
author Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Gulotta, Lawrence V.
De Salvatore, Sergio
Berton, Alessandra
Piergentili, Ilaria
Bandini, Benedetta
Lalli, Alberto
Denaro, Vincenzo
author_facet Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Gulotta, Lawrence V.
De Salvatore, Sergio
Berton, Alessandra
Piergentili, Ilaria
Bandini, Benedetta
Lalli, Alberto
Denaro, Vincenzo
author_sort Longo, Umile Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to have updated scrutiny of the influence of the humeral neck-shaft angle (HNSA) in patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A PRISMA-guided literature search was conducted from May to September 2021. Clinical outcome scores, functional parameters, and any complications were reviewed. Eleven papers were identified for inclusion in this systematic review. A total of 971 shoulders were evaluated at a minimum-follow up of 12 months, and a maximum of 120 months. The sample size for the “HNSA 155°” group is 449 patients, the “HNSA 145°” group involves 140 patients, and the “HSNA 135°” group comprises 291 patients. The HNSA represents an important variable in choosing the RSA implant design for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy. Positive outcomes are described for all the 155°, 145°, and 135° HSNA groups. Among the different implant designs, the 155° group show a better SST score, but also the highest rate of revisions and scapular notching; the 145° cohort achieve the best values in terms of active forward flexion, abduction, ASES score, and CMS, but also the highest rate of infections; while the 135° design obtains the best results in the external rotation with arm at side, but also the highest rate of fractures. High-quality studies are required to obtain valid results regarding the best prosthesis implant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9267919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92679192022-07-09 The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review Longo, Umile Giuseppe Gulotta, Lawrence V. De Salvatore, Sergio Berton, Alessandra Piergentili, Ilaria Bandini, Benedetta Lalli, Alberto Denaro, Vincenzo J Clin Med Review The aim of this study was to have updated scrutiny of the influence of the humeral neck-shaft angle (HNSA) in patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A PRISMA-guided literature search was conducted from May to September 2021. Clinical outcome scores, functional parameters, and any complications were reviewed. Eleven papers were identified for inclusion in this systematic review. A total of 971 shoulders were evaluated at a minimum-follow up of 12 months, and a maximum of 120 months. The sample size for the “HNSA 155°” group is 449 patients, the “HNSA 145°” group involves 140 patients, and the “HSNA 135°” group comprises 291 patients. The HNSA represents an important variable in choosing the RSA implant design for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy. Positive outcomes are described for all the 155°, 145°, and 135° HSNA groups. Among the different implant designs, the 155° group show a better SST score, but also the highest rate of revisions and scapular notching; the 145° cohort achieve the best values in terms of active forward flexion, abduction, ASES score, and CMS, but also the highest rate of infections; while the 135° design obtains the best results in the external rotation with arm at side, but also the highest rate of fractures. High-quality studies are required to obtain valid results regarding the best prosthesis implant. MDPI 2022-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9267919/ /pubmed/35806927 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133641 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Gulotta, Lawrence V.
De Salvatore, Sergio
Berton, Alessandra
Piergentili, Ilaria
Bandini, Benedetta
Lalli, Alberto
Denaro, Vincenzo
The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review
title The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review
title_full The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review
title_short The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review
title_sort role of humeral neck-shaft angle in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35806927
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133641
work_keys_str_mv AT longoumilegiuseppe theroleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview
AT gulottalawrencev theroleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview
AT desalvatoresergio theroleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview
AT bertonalessandra theroleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview
AT piergentiliilaria theroleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview
AT bandinibenedetta theroleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview
AT lallialberto theroleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview
AT denarovincenzo theroleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview
AT longoumilegiuseppe roleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview
AT gulottalawrencev roleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview
AT desalvatoresergio roleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview
AT bertonalessandra roleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview
AT piergentiliilaria roleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview
AT bandinibenedetta roleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview
AT lallialberto roleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview
AT denarovincenzo roleofhumeralneckshaftangleinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty155versus155asystematicreview