Cargando…

Proposal for Some Affordable Laboratory Biofilm Reactors and Their Critical Evaluations from Practical Viewpoints

Biofilms are a result of bacterial activities and are found everywhere. They often form on metal surfaces and on the surfaces of polymeric compounds. Biofilms are sticky and mostly consist of water. They have a strong resistance to antimicrobial agents and can cause serious problems for modern medic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kudara, Hikonaru, Kanematsu, Hideyuki, Barry, Dana M., Ogawa, Akiko, Kogo, Takeshi, Miura, Hidekazu, Kawai, Risa, Hirai, Nobumitsu, Kato, Takehito, Yoshitake, Michiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35806818
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15134691
_version_ 1784743863887331328
author Kudara, Hikonaru
Kanematsu, Hideyuki
Barry, Dana M.
Ogawa, Akiko
Kogo, Takeshi
Miura, Hidekazu
Kawai, Risa
Hirai, Nobumitsu
Kato, Takehito
Yoshitake, Michiko
author_facet Kudara, Hikonaru
Kanematsu, Hideyuki
Barry, Dana M.
Ogawa, Akiko
Kogo, Takeshi
Miura, Hidekazu
Kawai, Risa
Hirai, Nobumitsu
Kato, Takehito
Yoshitake, Michiko
author_sort Kudara, Hikonaru
collection PubMed
description Biofilms are a result of bacterial activities and are found everywhere. They often form on metal surfaces and on the surfaces of polymeric compounds. Biofilms are sticky and mostly consist of water. They have a strong resistance to antimicrobial agents and can cause serious problems for modern medicine and industry. Biofilms are composed of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) such as polysaccharides produced from bacterial cells and are dominated by water at the initial stage. In a series of experiments, using Escherichia coli, we developed three types of laboratory biofilm reactors (LBR) to simulate biofilm formation. For the first trial, we used a rotary type of biofilm reactor for stirring. For the next trial, we tried another rotary type of reactor where the circular plate holding specimens was rotated. Finally, a circular laboratory biofilm reactor was used. Biofilms were evaluated by using a crystal violet staining method and by using Raman spectroscopy. Additionally, they were compared to each other from the practical (industrial) viewpoints. The third type was the best to form biofilms in a short period. However, the first and second were better from the viewpoint of “ease of use”. All of these have their own advantages and disadvantages, respectively. Therefore, they should be properly selected and used for specific and appropriate purposes in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9267959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92679592022-07-09 Proposal for Some Affordable Laboratory Biofilm Reactors and Their Critical Evaluations from Practical Viewpoints Kudara, Hikonaru Kanematsu, Hideyuki Barry, Dana M. Ogawa, Akiko Kogo, Takeshi Miura, Hidekazu Kawai, Risa Hirai, Nobumitsu Kato, Takehito Yoshitake, Michiko Materials (Basel) Article Biofilms are a result of bacterial activities and are found everywhere. They often form on metal surfaces and on the surfaces of polymeric compounds. Biofilms are sticky and mostly consist of water. They have a strong resistance to antimicrobial agents and can cause serious problems for modern medicine and industry. Biofilms are composed of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) such as polysaccharides produced from bacterial cells and are dominated by water at the initial stage. In a series of experiments, using Escherichia coli, we developed three types of laboratory biofilm reactors (LBR) to simulate biofilm formation. For the first trial, we used a rotary type of biofilm reactor for stirring. For the next trial, we tried another rotary type of reactor where the circular plate holding specimens was rotated. Finally, a circular laboratory biofilm reactor was used. Biofilms were evaluated by using a crystal violet staining method and by using Raman spectroscopy. Additionally, they were compared to each other from the practical (industrial) viewpoints. The third type was the best to form biofilms in a short period. However, the first and second were better from the viewpoint of “ease of use”. All of these have their own advantages and disadvantages, respectively. Therefore, they should be properly selected and used for specific and appropriate purposes in the future. MDPI 2022-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9267959/ /pubmed/35806818 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15134691 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kudara, Hikonaru
Kanematsu, Hideyuki
Barry, Dana M.
Ogawa, Akiko
Kogo, Takeshi
Miura, Hidekazu
Kawai, Risa
Hirai, Nobumitsu
Kato, Takehito
Yoshitake, Michiko
Proposal for Some Affordable Laboratory Biofilm Reactors and Their Critical Evaluations from Practical Viewpoints
title Proposal for Some Affordable Laboratory Biofilm Reactors and Their Critical Evaluations from Practical Viewpoints
title_full Proposal for Some Affordable Laboratory Biofilm Reactors and Their Critical Evaluations from Practical Viewpoints
title_fullStr Proposal for Some Affordable Laboratory Biofilm Reactors and Their Critical Evaluations from Practical Viewpoints
title_full_unstemmed Proposal for Some Affordable Laboratory Biofilm Reactors and Their Critical Evaluations from Practical Viewpoints
title_short Proposal for Some Affordable Laboratory Biofilm Reactors and Their Critical Evaluations from Practical Viewpoints
title_sort proposal for some affordable laboratory biofilm reactors and their critical evaluations from practical viewpoints
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35806818
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15134691
work_keys_str_mv AT kudarahikonaru proposalforsomeaffordablelaboratorybiofilmreactorsandtheircriticalevaluationsfrompracticalviewpoints
AT kanematsuhideyuki proposalforsomeaffordablelaboratorybiofilmreactorsandtheircriticalevaluationsfrompracticalviewpoints
AT barrydanam proposalforsomeaffordablelaboratorybiofilmreactorsandtheircriticalevaluationsfrompracticalviewpoints
AT ogawaakiko proposalforsomeaffordablelaboratorybiofilmreactorsandtheircriticalevaluationsfrompracticalviewpoints
AT kogotakeshi proposalforsomeaffordablelaboratorybiofilmreactorsandtheircriticalevaluationsfrompracticalviewpoints
AT miurahidekazu proposalforsomeaffordablelaboratorybiofilmreactorsandtheircriticalevaluationsfrompracticalviewpoints
AT kawairisa proposalforsomeaffordablelaboratorybiofilmreactorsandtheircriticalevaluationsfrompracticalviewpoints
AT hirainobumitsu proposalforsomeaffordablelaboratorybiofilmreactorsandtheircriticalevaluationsfrompracticalviewpoints
AT katotakehito proposalforsomeaffordablelaboratorybiofilmreactorsandtheircriticalevaluationsfrompracticalviewpoints
AT yoshitakemichiko proposalforsomeaffordablelaboratorybiofilmreactorsandtheircriticalevaluationsfrompracticalviewpoints