Cargando…

Nutritional Outcomes One Year after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) are the most common bariatric procedures performed worldwide. SG is a restrictive procedure whereas OAGB involves malabsorption as well, supposing a risk of deficiency development post OAGB. The aim of the study was to compare nutriti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shirazi, Naama, Beglaibter, Nahum, Grinbaum, Ronit, Ahmad, Wiessam Abu, Aronis, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9268580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807778
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14132597
_version_ 1784744019549487104
author Shirazi, Naama
Beglaibter, Nahum
Grinbaum, Ronit
Ahmad, Wiessam Abu
Aronis, Anna
author_facet Shirazi, Naama
Beglaibter, Nahum
Grinbaum, Ronit
Ahmad, Wiessam Abu
Aronis, Anna
author_sort Shirazi, Naama
collection PubMed
description One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) are the most common bariatric procedures performed worldwide. SG is a restrictive procedure whereas OAGB involves malabsorption as well, supposing a risk of deficiency development post OAGB. The aim of the study was to compare nutritional deficiencies and metabolic markers one year after the procedures, while adhering to the current protocols. Retrospective analysis was performed for data on 60 adults undergoing primary OAGB, compared to 60 undergoing primary SG. Mean pre-surgery BMI for SG was 42.7 kg/m(2) and 43.3 kg/m(2) for OAGB. A multidisciplinary team followed up with the patients at least 3 times during the first year. Mean weight loss was 39.0 kg for SG and 44.1 kg for OAGB. The OAGB group presented a significantly sharper decline in T.Chol and a trend for sharper LDL decrease; a higher increase in folate and a trend for a greater decrease in albumin and hemoglobin were observed in OAGB. For vitamin B12, D, iron and ferritin, no difference was observed between the treatment groups, although there were some in-group differences. Nutritional recommendations and adopted supplement plans minimize the risk of deficiencies and result in improvement in metabolic biomarkers one year after OAGB, which was comparable to SG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9268580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92685802022-07-09 Nutritional Outcomes One Year after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy Shirazi, Naama Beglaibter, Nahum Grinbaum, Ronit Ahmad, Wiessam Abu Aronis, Anna Nutrients Article One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) are the most common bariatric procedures performed worldwide. SG is a restrictive procedure whereas OAGB involves malabsorption as well, supposing a risk of deficiency development post OAGB. The aim of the study was to compare nutritional deficiencies and metabolic markers one year after the procedures, while adhering to the current protocols. Retrospective analysis was performed for data on 60 adults undergoing primary OAGB, compared to 60 undergoing primary SG. Mean pre-surgery BMI for SG was 42.7 kg/m(2) and 43.3 kg/m(2) for OAGB. A multidisciplinary team followed up with the patients at least 3 times during the first year. Mean weight loss was 39.0 kg for SG and 44.1 kg for OAGB. The OAGB group presented a significantly sharper decline in T.Chol and a trend for sharper LDL decrease; a higher increase in folate and a trend for a greater decrease in albumin and hemoglobin were observed in OAGB. For vitamin B12, D, iron and ferritin, no difference was observed between the treatment groups, although there were some in-group differences. Nutritional recommendations and adopted supplement plans minimize the risk of deficiencies and result in improvement in metabolic biomarkers one year after OAGB, which was comparable to SG. MDPI 2022-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9268580/ /pubmed/35807778 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14132597 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shirazi, Naama
Beglaibter, Nahum
Grinbaum, Ronit
Ahmad, Wiessam Abu
Aronis, Anna
Nutritional Outcomes One Year after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy
title Nutritional Outcomes One Year after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy
title_full Nutritional Outcomes One Year after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy
title_fullStr Nutritional Outcomes One Year after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Nutritional Outcomes One Year after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy
title_short Nutritional Outcomes One Year after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy
title_sort nutritional outcomes one year after one anastomosis gastric bypass compared to sleeve gastrectomy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9268580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807778
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14132597
work_keys_str_mv AT shirazinaama nutritionaloutcomesoneyearafteroneanastomosisgastricbypasscomparedtosleevegastrectomy
AT beglaibternahum nutritionaloutcomesoneyearafteroneanastomosisgastricbypasscomparedtosleevegastrectomy
AT grinbaumronit nutritionaloutcomesoneyearafteroneanastomosisgastricbypasscomparedtosleevegastrectomy
AT ahmadwiessamabu nutritionaloutcomesoneyearafteroneanastomosisgastricbypasscomparedtosleevegastrectomy
AT aronisanna nutritionaloutcomesoneyearafteroneanastomosisgastricbypasscomparedtosleevegastrectomy