Cargando…
Nutritional Outcomes One Year after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) are the most common bariatric procedures performed worldwide. SG is a restrictive procedure whereas OAGB involves malabsorption as well, supposing a risk of deficiency development post OAGB. The aim of the study was to compare nutriti...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9268580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807778 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14132597 |
_version_ | 1784744019549487104 |
---|---|
author | Shirazi, Naama Beglaibter, Nahum Grinbaum, Ronit Ahmad, Wiessam Abu Aronis, Anna |
author_facet | Shirazi, Naama Beglaibter, Nahum Grinbaum, Ronit Ahmad, Wiessam Abu Aronis, Anna |
author_sort | Shirazi, Naama |
collection | PubMed |
description | One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) are the most common bariatric procedures performed worldwide. SG is a restrictive procedure whereas OAGB involves malabsorption as well, supposing a risk of deficiency development post OAGB. The aim of the study was to compare nutritional deficiencies and metabolic markers one year after the procedures, while adhering to the current protocols. Retrospective analysis was performed for data on 60 adults undergoing primary OAGB, compared to 60 undergoing primary SG. Mean pre-surgery BMI for SG was 42.7 kg/m(2) and 43.3 kg/m(2) for OAGB. A multidisciplinary team followed up with the patients at least 3 times during the first year. Mean weight loss was 39.0 kg for SG and 44.1 kg for OAGB. The OAGB group presented a significantly sharper decline in T.Chol and a trend for sharper LDL decrease; a higher increase in folate and a trend for a greater decrease in albumin and hemoglobin were observed in OAGB. For vitamin B12, D, iron and ferritin, no difference was observed between the treatment groups, although there were some in-group differences. Nutritional recommendations and adopted supplement plans minimize the risk of deficiencies and result in improvement in metabolic biomarkers one year after OAGB, which was comparable to SG. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9268580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92685802022-07-09 Nutritional Outcomes One Year after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy Shirazi, Naama Beglaibter, Nahum Grinbaum, Ronit Ahmad, Wiessam Abu Aronis, Anna Nutrients Article One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) are the most common bariatric procedures performed worldwide. SG is a restrictive procedure whereas OAGB involves malabsorption as well, supposing a risk of deficiency development post OAGB. The aim of the study was to compare nutritional deficiencies and metabolic markers one year after the procedures, while adhering to the current protocols. Retrospective analysis was performed for data on 60 adults undergoing primary OAGB, compared to 60 undergoing primary SG. Mean pre-surgery BMI for SG was 42.7 kg/m(2) and 43.3 kg/m(2) for OAGB. A multidisciplinary team followed up with the patients at least 3 times during the first year. Mean weight loss was 39.0 kg for SG and 44.1 kg for OAGB. The OAGB group presented a significantly sharper decline in T.Chol and a trend for sharper LDL decrease; a higher increase in folate and a trend for a greater decrease in albumin and hemoglobin were observed in OAGB. For vitamin B12, D, iron and ferritin, no difference was observed between the treatment groups, although there were some in-group differences. Nutritional recommendations and adopted supplement plans minimize the risk of deficiencies and result in improvement in metabolic biomarkers one year after OAGB, which was comparable to SG. MDPI 2022-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9268580/ /pubmed/35807778 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14132597 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Shirazi, Naama Beglaibter, Nahum Grinbaum, Ronit Ahmad, Wiessam Abu Aronis, Anna Nutritional Outcomes One Year after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy |
title | Nutritional Outcomes One Year after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy |
title_full | Nutritional Outcomes One Year after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy |
title_fullStr | Nutritional Outcomes One Year after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Nutritional Outcomes One Year after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy |
title_short | Nutritional Outcomes One Year after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy |
title_sort | nutritional outcomes one year after one anastomosis gastric bypass compared to sleeve gastrectomy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9268580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807778 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14132597 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shirazinaama nutritionaloutcomesoneyearafteroneanastomosisgastricbypasscomparedtosleevegastrectomy AT beglaibternahum nutritionaloutcomesoneyearafteroneanastomosisgastricbypasscomparedtosleevegastrectomy AT grinbaumronit nutritionaloutcomesoneyearafteroneanastomosisgastricbypasscomparedtosleevegastrectomy AT ahmadwiessamabu nutritionaloutcomesoneyearafteroneanastomosisgastricbypasscomparedtosleevegastrectomy AT aronisanna nutritionaloutcomesoneyearafteroneanastomosisgastricbypasscomparedtosleevegastrectomy |