Cargando…
Evaluating the Efficacy of Probiotics in IBS Treatment Using a Systematic Review of Clinical Trials and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
The evaluation of probiotics’ efficacy in treating irritable bowel syndrome is supported by an increasing number of clinical studies based on a heterogeneous approach of products tested and the patient cohort involved. Although the role of gut microbiota dysbiosis in IBS pathogenesis and the benefic...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9268703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807868 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14132689 |
_version_ | 1784744050264375296 |
---|---|
author | Ceccherini, Cecilia Daniotti, Sara Bearzi, Claudia Re, Ilaria |
author_facet | Ceccherini, Cecilia Daniotti, Sara Bearzi, Claudia Re, Ilaria |
author_sort | Ceccherini, Cecilia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The evaluation of probiotics’ efficacy in treating irritable bowel syndrome is supported by an increasing number of clinical studies based on a heterogeneous approach of products tested and the patient cohort involved. Although the role of gut microbiota dysbiosis in IBS pathogenesis and the beneficial contribution of probiotics were demonstrated, a tool to discriminate symptom-specific strains and a personalised medicine protocol are still lacking. Thus, this study employs, for the first time, a method that combines the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis and multi-criteria decision analysis methods in a structured decision-making tool to analyze the efficacy of probiotic mix, in order to identify the most effective formulation and to discriminate which probiotics are more efficient in treating different symptoms. The PRISMA methodology resulted in a qualitative and quantitative analysis of 104 clinical studies from 2011 to 2021, revealing a prevalence of Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis. MCDA analysis showed that formulations based on Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus acidophilus have the highest efficacy, especially on quality of life, bloating, and abdominal pain. This methodological approach could become more specific by modelling clinical studies according to the age and gender of patients and probiotic strain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9268703 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92687032022-07-09 Evaluating the Efficacy of Probiotics in IBS Treatment Using a Systematic Review of Clinical Trials and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Ceccherini, Cecilia Daniotti, Sara Bearzi, Claudia Re, Ilaria Nutrients Article The evaluation of probiotics’ efficacy in treating irritable bowel syndrome is supported by an increasing number of clinical studies based on a heterogeneous approach of products tested and the patient cohort involved. Although the role of gut microbiota dysbiosis in IBS pathogenesis and the beneficial contribution of probiotics were demonstrated, a tool to discriminate symptom-specific strains and a personalised medicine protocol are still lacking. Thus, this study employs, for the first time, a method that combines the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis and multi-criteria decision analysis methods in a structured decision-making tool to analyze the efficacy of probiotic mix, in order to identify the most effective formulation and to discriminate which probiotics are more efficient in treating different symptoms. The PRISMA methodology resulted in a qualitative and quantitative analysis of 104 clinical studies from 2011 to 2021, revealing a prevalence of Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis. MCDA analysis showed that formulations based on Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus acidophilus have the highest efficacy, especially on quality of life, bloating, and abdominal pain. This methodological approach could become more specific by modelling clinical studies according to the age and gender of patients and probiotic strain. MDPI 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9268703/ /pubmed/35807868 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14132689 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ceccherini, Cecilia Daniotti, Sara Bearzi, Claudia Re, Ilaria Evaluating the Efficacy of Probiotics in IBS Treatment Using a Systematic Review of Clinical Trials and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis |
title | Evaluating the Efficacy of Probiotics in IBS Treatment Using a Systematic Review of Clinical Trials and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis |
title_full | Evaluating the Efficacy of Probiotics in IBS Treatment Using a Systematic Review of Clinical Trials and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the Efficacy of Probiotics in IBS Treatment Using a Systematic Review of Clinical Trials and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the Efficacy of Probiotics in IBS Treatment Using a Systematic Review of Clinical Trials and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis |
title_short | Evaluating the Efficacy of Probiotics in IBS Treatment Using a Systematic Review of Clinical Trials and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis |
title_sort | evaluating the efficacy of probiotics in ibs treatment using a systematic review of clinical trials and multi-criteria decision analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9268703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35807868 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14132689 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ceccherinicecilia evaluatingtheefficacyofprobioticsinibstreatmentusingasystematicreviewofclinicaltrialsandmulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT daniottisara evaluatingtheefficacyofprobioticsinibstreatmentusingasystematicreviewofclinicaltrialsandmulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT bearziclaudia evaluatingtheefficacyofprobioticsinibstreatmentusingasystematicreviewofclinicaltrialsandmulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT reilaria evaluatingtheefficacyofprobioticsinibstreatmentusingasystematicreviewofclinicaltrialsandmulticriteriadecisionanalysis |