Cargando…

Study on Different Shear Performance of Moso Bamboo in Four Test Methods

Bamboo is recognized as a potential and sustainable green material. The longitudinal-splitting and shear strengths of bamboo are weak but critical to its utilizations. To discuss the different shear performances of bamboo, the shear strength and behaviors of bamboo culm were investigated by four tes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Aiyue, Su, Qin, Zong, Yurong, Chen, Xiaohan, Liu, Huanrong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9268990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35808694
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14132649
_version_ 1784744122893991936
author Huang, Aiyue
Su, Qin
Zong, Yurong
Chen, Xiaohan
Liu, Huanrong
author_facet Huang, Aiyue
Su, Qin
Zong, Yurong
Chen, Xiaohan
Liu, Huanrong
author_sort Huang, Aiyue
collection PubMed
description Bamboo is recognized as a potential and sustainable green material. The longitudinal-splitting and shear strengths of bamboo are weak but critical to its utilizations. To discuss the different shear performances of bamboo, the shear strength and behaviors of bamboo culm were investigated by four test methods: the tensile-shear, step-shear, cross-shear, and short-beam-shear methods. Then, the different shear performance and mechanisms were discussed. Results indicated that the shear strength was significantly different in the four test methods and was highest in the step-shear-test method but lowest in the tensile-shear-test method. Moreover, the typical load-displacement curves were different across the shear methods but were similar to the curves of the respective loading modes. The axially aligned fiber bundles played an important role in all the shear performances. In the tensile-shear method, specimens fractured at the interface of the bamboo-fiber bundles. However, compress-shear behaviors were a combination of compression and shear. Then, the cross-shear method, in compress-shear, was lower than that of the step-shear method because of oval-shaped bamboo culm sections of different thickness. In the short-beam shear method, the behaviors and shearing characteristics were like bending with the fiber bundle pulled out.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9268990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92689902022-07-09 Study on Different Shear Performance of Moso Bamboo in Four Test Methods Huang, Aiyue Su, Qin Zong, Yurong Chen, Xiaohan Liu, Huanrong Polymers (Basel) Article Bamboo is recognized as a potential and sustainable green material. The longitudinal-splitting and shear strengths of bamboo are weak but critical to its utilizations. To discuss the different shear performances of bamboo, the shear strength and behaviors of bamboo culm were investigated by four test methods: the tensile-shear, step-shear, cross-shear, and short-beam-shear methods. Then, the different shear performance and mechanisms were discussed. Results indicated that the shear strength was significantly different in the four test methods and was highest in the step-shear-test method but lowest in the tensile-shear-test method. Moreover, the typical load-displacement curves were different across the shear methods but were similar to the curves of the respective loading modes. The axially aligned fiber bundles played an important role in all the shear performances. In the tensile-shear method, specimens fractured at the interface of the bamboo-fiber bundles. However, compress-shear behaviors were a combination of compression and shear. Then, the cross-shear method, in compress-shear, was lower than that of the step-shear method because of oval-shaped bamboo culm sections of different thickness. In the short-beam shear method, the behaviors and shearing characteristics were like bending with the fiber bundle pulled out. MDPI 2022-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9268990/ /pubmed/35808694 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14132649 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Huang, Aiyue
Su, Qin
Zong, Yurong
Chen, Xiaohan
Liu, Huanrong
Study on Different Shear Performance of Moso Bamboo in Four Test Methods
title Study on Different Shear Performance of Moso Bamboo in Four Test Methods
title_full Study on Different Shear Performance of Moso Bamboo in Four Test Methods
title_fullStr Study on Different Shear Performance of Moso Bamboo in Four Test Methods
title_full_unstemmed Study on Different Shear Performance of Moso Bamboo in Four Test Methods
title_short Study on Different Shear Performance of Moso Bamboo in Four Test Methods
title_sort study on different shear performance of moso bamboo in four test methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9268990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35808694
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14132649
work_keys_str_mv AT huangaiyue studyondifferentshearperformanceofmosobambooinfourtestmethods
AT suqin studyondifferentshearperformanceofmosobambooinfourtestmethods
AT zongyurong studyondifferentshearperformanceofmosobambooinfourtestmethods
AT chenxiaohan studyondifferentshearperformanceofmosobambooinfourtestmethods
AT liuhuanrong studyondifferentshearperformanceofmosobambooinfourtestmethods