Cargando…
Assessment of drag measurement techniques in a shock tunnel
Three force measurement techniques in a shock tunnel, the free-flight, movable-support force balance, and stress-wave force balance techniques were employed, and each technique’s characteristics were assessed. For each force measurement technique, the system setup, data processing method, measuremen...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9269454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35802559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270743 |
_version_ | 1784744240829431808 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Keunyeong Jang, Byungkook Lee, Sanghoon Park, Gisu |
author_facet | Kim, Keunyeong Jang, Byungkook Lee, Sanghoon Park, Gisu |
author_sort | Kim, Keunyeong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Three force measurement techniques in a shock tunnel, the free-flight, movable-support force balance, and stress-wave force balance techniques were employed, and each technique’s characteristics were assessed. For each force measurement technique, the system setup, data processing method, measurement uncertainties, and applied range of the test model size-flow establishment time were described in detail and compared. For a comparison and discussion, the drag coefficients of a circular pointed cone model with a semi-angle of 18.4° at a nominal freestream Mach number of 6 were measured. As a result, three force measurement techniques yield similar drag coefficients. However, the measurement uncertainties were increased in the order of the free-flight, the stress-wave force balance, and the movable-support force balance techniques. The main causes of the measurement uncertainties were the corner detection uncertainties for the free-flight techniques, and the propagation of the internal or external vibrations for the movable-support and stress-wave force balance techniques. To estimate the appropriate range of the test model size and flow establishment time for each technique’s application, the force measurement systems of the present work and the available literature were compared. As a result of comparative discussion, force measurement environments that can be advantageous for each technique are suggested. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9269454 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92694542022-07-09 Assessment of drag measurement techniques in a shock tunnel Kim, Keunyeong Jang, Byungkook Lee, Sanghoon Park, Gisu PLoS One Research Article Three force measurement techniques in a shock tunnel, the free-flight, movable-support force balance, and stress-wave force balance techniques were employed, and each technique’s characteristics were assessed. For each force measurement technique, the system setup, data processing method, measurement uncertainties, and applied range of the test model size-flow establishment time were described in detail and compared. For a comparison and discussion, the drag coefficients of a circular pointed cone model with a semi-angle of 18.4° at a nominal freestream Mach number of 6 were measured. As a result, three force measurement techniques yield similar drag coefficients. However, the measurement uncertainties were increased in the order of the free-flight, the stress-wave force balance, and the movable-support force balance techniques. The main causes of the measurement uncertainties were the corner detection uncertainties for the free-flight techniques, and the propagation of the internal or external vibrations for the movable-support and stress-wave force balance techniques. To estimate the appropriate range of the test model size and flow establishment time for each technique’s application, the force measurement systems of the present work and the available literature were compared. As a result of comparative discussion, force measurement environments that can be advantageous for each technique are suggested. Public Library of Science 2022-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9269454/ /pubmed/35802559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270743 Text en © 2022 Kim et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kim, Keunyeong Jang, Byungkook Lee, Sanghoon Park, Gisu Assessment of drag measurement techniques in a shock tunnel |
title | Assessment of drag measurement techniques in a shock tunnel |
title_full | Assessment of drag measurement techniques in a shock tunnel |
title_fullStr | Assessment of drag measurement techniques in a shock tunnel |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of drag measurement techniques in a shock tunnel |
title_short | Assessment of drag measurement techniques in a shock tunnel |
title_sort | assessment of drag measurement techniques in a shock tunnel |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9269454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35802559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270743 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimkeunyeong assessmentofdragmeasurementtechniquesinashocktunnel AT jangbyungkook assessmentofdragmeasurementtechniquesinashocktunnel AT leesanghoon assessmentofdragmeasurementtechniquesinashocktunnel AT parkgisu assessmentofdragmeasurementtechniquesinashocktunnel |