Cargando…

Assessment of drag measurement techniques in a shock tunnel

Three force measurement techniques in a shock tunnel, the free-flight, movable-support force balance, and stress-wave force balance techniques were employed, and each technique’s characteristics were assessed. For each force measurement technique, the system setup, data processing method, measuremen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Keunyeong, Jang, Byungkook, Lee, Sanghoon, Park, Gisu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9269454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35802559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270743
_version_ 1784744240829431808
author Kim, Keunyeong
Jang, Byungkook
Lee, Sanghoon
Park, Gisu
author_facet Kim, Keunyeong
Jang, Byungkook
Lee, Sanghoon
Park, Gisu
author_sort Kim, Keunyeong
collection PubMed
description Three force measurement techniques in a shock tunnel, the free-flight, movable-support force balance, and stress-wave force balance techniques were employed, and each technique’s characteristics were assessed. For each force measurement technique, the system setup, data processing method, measurement uncertainties, and applied range of the test model size-flow establishment time were described in detail and compared. For a comparison and discussion, the drag coefficients of a circular pointed cone model with a semi-angle of 18.4° at a nominal freestream Mach number of 6 were measured. As a result, three force measurement techniques yield similar drag coefficients. However, the measurement uncertainties were increased in the order of the free-flight, the stress-wave force balance, and the movable-support force balance techniques. The main causes of the measurement uncertainties were the corner detection uncertainties for the free-flight techniques, and the propagation of the internal or external vibrations for the movable-support and stress-wave force balance techniques. To estimate the appropriate range of the test model size and flow establishment time for each technique’s application, the force measurement systems of the present work and the available literature were compared. As a result of comparative discussion, force measurement environments that can be advantageous for each technique are suggested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9269454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92694542022-07-09 Assessment of drag measurement techniques in a shock tunnel Kim, Keunyeong Jang, Byungkook Lee, Sanghoon Park, Gisu PLoS One Research Article Three force measurement techniques in a shock tunnel, the free-flight, movable-support force balance, and stress-wave force balance techniques were employed, and each technique’s characteristics were assessed. For each force measurement technique, the system setup, data processing method, measurement uncertainties, and applied range of the test model size-flow establishment time were described in detail and compared. For a comparison and discussion, the drag coefficients of a circular pointed cone model with a semi-angle of 18.4° at a nominal freestream Mach number of 6 were measured. As a result, three force measurement techniques yield similar drag coefficients. However, the measurement uncertainties were increased in the order of the free-flight, the stress-wave force balance, and the movable-support force balance techniques. The main causes of the measurement uncertainties were the corner detection uncertainties for the free-flight techniques, and the propagation of the internal or external vibrations for the movable-support and stress-wave force balance techniques. To estimate the appropriate range of the test model size and flow establishment time for each technique’s application, the force measurement systems of the present work and the available literature were compared. As a result of comparative discussion, force measurement environments that can be advantageous for each technique are suggested. Public Library of Science 2022-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9269454/ /pubmed/35802559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270743 Text en © 2022 Kim et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Keunyeong
Jang, Byungkook
Lee, Sanghoon
Park, Gisu
Assessment of drag measurement techniques in a shock tunnel
title Assessment of drag measurement techniques in a shock tunnel
title_full Assessment of drag measurement techniques in a shock tunnel
title_fullStr Assessment of drag measurement techniques in a shock tunnel
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of drag measurement techniques in a shock tunnel
title_short Assessment of drag measurement techniques in a shock tunnel
title_sort assessment of drag measurement techniques in a shock tunnel
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9269454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35802559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270743
work_keys_str_mv AT kimkeunyeong assessmentofdragmeasurementtechniquesinashocktunnel
AT jangbyungkook assessmentofdragmeasurementtechniquesinashocktunnel
AT leesanghoon assessmentofdragmeasurementtechniquesinashocktunnel
AT parkgisu assessmentofdragmeasurementtechniquesinashocktunnel