Cargando…
Machine Learning Identifies Chronic Low Back Pain Patients from an Instrumented Trunk Bending and Return Test
Nowadays, the better assessment of low back pain (LBP) is an important challenge, as it is the leading musculoskeletal condition worldwide in terms of years of disability. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relevance of various machine learning (ML) algorithms and Sample Entropy (SampEn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9269703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35808522 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22135027 |
_version_ | 1784744285868916736 |
---|---|
author | Thiry, Paul Houry, Martin Philippe, Laurent Nocent, Olivier Buisseret, Fabien Dierick, Frédéric Slama, Rim Bertucci, William Thévenon, André Simoneau-Buessinger, Emilie |
author_facet | Thiry, Paul Houry, Martin Philippe, Laurent Nocent, Olivier Buisseret, Fabien Dierick, Frédéric Slama, Rim Bertucci, William Thévenon, André Simoneau-Buessinger, Emilie |
author_sort | Thiry, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nowadays, the better assessment of low back pain (LBP) is an important challenge, as it is the leading musculoskeletal condition worldwide in terms of years of disability. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relevance of various machine learning (ML) algorithms and Sample Entropy (SampEn), which assesses the complexity of motion variability in identifying the condition of low back pain. Twenty chronic low-back pain (CLBP) patients and 20 healthy non-LBP participants performed 1-min repetitive bending (flexion) and return (extension) trunk movements. Analysis was performed using the time series recorded by three inertial sensors attached to the participants. It was found that SampEn was significantly lower in CLBP patients, indicating a loss of movement complexity due to LBP. Gaussian Naive Bayes ML proved to be the best of the various tested algorithms, achieving 79% accuracy in identifying CLBP patients. Angular velocity of flexion movement was the most discriminative feature in the ML analysis. This study demonstrated that: supervised ML and a complexity assessment of trunk movement variability are useful in the identification of CLBP condition, and that simple kinematic indicators are sensitive to this condition. Therefore, ML could be progressively adopted by clinicians in the assessment of CLBP patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9269703 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92697032022-07-09 Machine Learning Identifies Chronic Low Back Pain Patients from an Instrumented Trunk Bending and Return Test Thiry, Paul Houry, Martin Philippe, Laurent Nocent, Olivier Buisseret, Fabien Dierick, Frédéric Slama, Rim Bertucci, William Thévenon, André Simoneau-Buessinger, Emilie Sensors (Basel) Article Nowadays, the better assessment of low back pain (LBP) is an important challenge, as it is the leading musculoskeletal condition worldwide in terms of years of disability. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relevance of various machine learning (ML) algorithms and Sample Entropy (SampEn), which assesses the complexity of motion variability in identifying the condition of low back pain. Twenty chronic low-back pain (CLBP) patients and 20 healthy non-LBP participants performed 1-min repetitive bending (flexion) and return (extension) trunk movements. Analysis was performed using the time series recorded by three inertial sensors attached to the participants. It was found that SampEn was significantly lower in CLBP patients, indicating a loss of movement complexity due to LBP. Gaussian Naive Bayes ML proved to be the best of the various tested algorithms, achieving 79% accuracy in identifying CLBP patients. Angular velocity of flexion movement was the most discriminative feature in the ML analysis. This study demonstrated that: supervised ML and a complexity assessment of trunk movement variability are useful in the identification of CLBP condition, and that simple kinematic indicators are sensitive to this condition. Therefore, ML could be progressively adopted by clinicians in the assessment of CLBP patients. MDPI 2022-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9269703/ /pubmed/35808522 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22135027 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Thiry, Paul Houry, Martin Philippe, Laurent Nocent, Olivier Buisseret, Fabien Dierick, Frédéric Slama, Rim Bertucci, William Thévenon, André Simoneau-Buessinger, Emilie Machine Learning Identifies Chronic Low Back Pain Patients from an Instrumented Trunk Bending and Return Test |
title | Machine Learning Identifies Chronic Low Back Pain Patients from an Instrumented Trunk Bending and Return Test |
title_full | Machine Learning Identifies Chronic Low Back Pain Patients from an Instrumented Trunk Bending and Return Test |
title_fullStr | Machine Learning Identifies Chronic Low Back Pain Patients from an Instrumented Trunk Bending and Return Test |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine Learning Identifies Chronic Low Back Pain Patients from an Instrumented Trunk Bending and Return Test |
title_short | Machine Learning Identifies Chronic Low Back Pain Patients from an Instrumented Trunk Bending and Return Test |
title_sort | machine learning identifies chronic low back pain patients from an instrumented trunk bending and return test |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9269703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35808522 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22135027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thirypaul machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest AT hourymartin machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest AT philippelaurent machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest AT nocentolivier machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest AT buisseretfabien machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest AT dierickfrederic machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest AT slamarim machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest AT bertucciwilliam machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest AT thevenonandre machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest AT simoneaubuessingeremilie machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest |