Cargando…

Machine Learning Identifies Chronic Low Back Pain Patients from an Instrumented Trunk Bending and Return Test

Nowadays, the better assessment of low back pain (LBP) is an important challenge, as it is the leading musculoskeletal condition worldwide in terms of years of disability. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relevance of various machine learning (ML) algorithms and Sample Entropy (SampEn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thiry, Paul, Houry, Martin, Philippe, Laurent, Nocent, Olivier, Buisseret, Fabien, Dierick, Frédéric, Slama, Rim, Bertucci, William, Thévenon, André, Simoneau-Buessinger, Emilie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9269703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35808522
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22135027
_version_ 1784744285868916736
author Thiry, Paul
Houry, Martin
Philippe, Laurent
Nocent, Olivier
Buisseret, Fabien
Dierick, Frédéric
Slama, Rim
Bertucci, William
Thévenon, André
Simoneau-Buessinger, Emilie
author_facet Thiry, Paul
Houry, Martin
Philippe, Laurent
Nocent, Olivier
Buisseret, Fabien
Dierick, Frédéric
Slama, Rim
Bertucci, William
Thévenon, André
Simoneau-Buessinger, Emilie
author_sort Thiry, Paul
collection PubMed
description Nowadays, the better assessment of low back pain (LBP) is an important challenge, as it is the leading musculoskeletal condition worldwide in terms of years of disability. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relevance of various machine learning (ML) algorithms and Sample Entropy (SampEn), which assesses the complexity of motion variability in identifying the condition of low back pain. Twenty chronic low-back pain (CLBP) patients and 20 healthy non-LBP participants performed 1-min repetitive bending (flexion) and return (extension) trunk movements. Analysis was performed using the time series recorded by three inertial sensors attached to the participants. It was found that SampEn was significantly lower in CLBP patients, indicating a loss of movement complexity due to LBP. Gaussian Naive Bayes ML proved to be the best of the various tested algorithms, achieving 79% accuracy in identifying CLBP patients. Angular velocity of flexion movement was the most discriminative feature in the ML analysis. This study demonstrated that: supervised ML and a complexity assessment of trunk movement variability are useful in the identification of CLBP condition, and that simple kinematic indicators are sensitive to this condition. Therefore, ML could be progressively adopted by clinicians in the assessment of CLBP patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9269703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92697032022-07-09 Machine Learning Identifies Chronic Low Back Pain Patients from an Instrumented Trunk Bending and Return Test Thiry, Paul Houry, Martin Philippe, Laurent Nocent, Olivier Buisseret, Fabien Dierick, Frédéric Slama, Rim Bertucci, William Thévenon, André Simoneau-Buessinger, Emilie Sensors (Basel) Article Nowadays, the better assessment of low back pain (LBP) is an important challenge, as it is the leading musculoskeletal condition worldwide in terms of years of disability. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relevance of various machine learning (ML) algorithms and Sample Entropy (SampEn), which assesses the complexity of motion variability in identifying the condition of low back pain. Twenty chronic low-back pain (CLBP) patients and 20 healthy non-LBP participants performed 1-min repetitive bending (flexion) and return (extension) trunk movements. Analysis was performed using the time series recorded by three inertial sensors attached to the participants. It was found that SampEn was significantly lower in CLBP patients, indicating a loss of movement complexity due to LBP. Gaussian Naive Bayes ML proved to be the best of the various tested algorithms, achieving 79% accuracy in identifying CLBP patients. Angular velocity of flexion movement was the most discriminative feature in the ML analysis. This study demonstrated that: supervised ML and a complexity assessment of trunk movement variability are useful in the identification of CLBP condition, and that simple kinematic indicators are sensitive to this condition. Therefore, ML could be progressively adopted by clinicians in the assessment of CLBP patients. MDPI 2022-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9269703/ /pubmed/35808522 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22135027 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Thiry, Paul
Houry, Martin
Philippe, Laurent
Nocent, Olivier
Buisseret, Fabien
Dierick, Frédéric
Slama, Rim
Bertucci, William
Thévenon, André
Simoneau-Buessinger, Emilie
Machine Learning Identifies Chronic Low Back Pain Patients from an Instrumented Trunk Bending and Return Test
title Machine Learning Identifies Chronic Low Back Pain Patients from an Instrumented Trunk Bending and Return Test
title_full Machine Learning Identifies Chronic Low Back Pain Patients from an Instrumented Trunk Bending and Return Test
title_fullStr Machine Learning Identifies Chronic Low Back Pain Patients from an Instrumented Trunk Bending and Return Test
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning Identifies Chronic Low Back Pain Patients from an Instrumented Trunk Bending and Return Test
title_short Machine Learning Identifies Chronic Low Back Pain Patients from an Instrumented Trunk Bending and Return Test
title_sort machine learning identifies chronic low back pain patients from an instrumented trunk bending and return test
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9269703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35808522
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22135027
work_keys_str_mv AT thirypaul machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest
AT hourymartin machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest
AT philippelaurent machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest
AT nocentolivier machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest
AT buisseretfabien machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest
AT dierickfrederic machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest
AT slamarim machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest
AT bertucciwilliam machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest
AT thevenonandre machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest
AT simoneaubuessingeremilie machinelearningidentifieschroniclowbackpainpatientsfromaninstrumentedtrunkbendingandreturntest