Cargando…

System Comparison for Gait and Balance Monitoring Used for the Evaluation of a Home-Based Training

There are currently no standard methods for evaluating gait and balance performance at home. Smartphones include acceleration sensors and may represent a promising and easily accessible tool for this purpose. We performed an interventional feasibility study and compared a smartphone-based approach w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rentz, Clara, Far, Mehran Sahandi, Boltes, Maik, Schnitzler, Alfons, Amunts, Katrin, Dukart, Juergen, Minnerop, Martina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9269735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35808470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22134975
_version_ 1784744293650399232
author Rentz, Clara
Far, Mehran Sahandi
Boltes, Maik
Schnitzler, Alfons
Amunts, Katrin
Dukart, Juergen
Minnerop, Martina
author_facet Rentz, Clara
Far, Mehran Sahandi
Boltes, Maik
Schnitzler, Alfons
Amunts, Katrin
Dukart, Juergen
Minnerop, Martina
author_sort Rentz, Clara
collection PubMed
description There are currently no standard methods for evaluating gait and balance performance at home. Smartphones include acceleration sensors and may represent a promising and easily accessible tool for this purpose. We performed an interventional feasibility study and compared a smartphone-based approach with two standard gait analysis systems (force plate and motion capturing systems). Healthy adults (n = 25, 44.1 ± 18.4 years) completed two laboratory evaluations before and after a three-week gait and balance training at home. There was an excellent agreement between all systems for stride time and cadence during normal, tandem and backward gait, whereas correlations for gait velocity were lower. Balance variables of both standard systems were moderately intercorrelated across all stance tasks, but only few correlated with the corresponding smartphone measures. Significant differences over time were found for several force plate and mocap system-obtained gait variables of normal, backward and tandem gait. Changes in balance variables over time were more heterogeneous and not significant for any system. The smartphone seems to be a suitable method to measure cadence and stride time of different gait, but not balance, tasks in healthy adults. Additional optimizations in data evaluation and processing may further improve the agreement between the analysis systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9269735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92697352022-07-09 System Comparison for Gait and Balance Monitoring Used for the Evaluation of a Home-Based Training Rentz, Clara Far, Mehran Sahandi Boltes, Maik Schnitzler, Alfons Amunts, Katrin Dukart, Juergen Minnerop, Martina Sensors (Basel) Article There are currently no standard methods for evaluating gait and balance performance at home. Smartphones include acceleration sensors and may represent a promising and easily accessible tool for this purpose. We performed an interventional feasibility study and compared a smartphone-based approach with two standard gait analysis systems (force plate and motion capturing systems). Healthy adults (n = 25, 44.1 ± 18.4 years) completed two laboratory evaluations before and after a three-week gait and balance training at home. There was an excellent agreement between all systems for stride time and cadence during normal, tandem and backward gait, whereas correlations for gait velocity were lower. Balance variables of both standard systems were moderately intercorrelated across all stance tasks, but only few correlated with the corresponding smartphone measures. Significant differences over time were found for several force plate and mocap system-obtained gait variables of normal, backward and tandem gait. Changes in balance variables over time were more heterogeneous and not significant for any system. The smartphone seems to be a suitable method to measure cadence and stride time of different gait, but not balance, tasks in healthy adults. Additional optimizations in data evaluation and processing may further improve the agreement between the analysis systems. MDPI 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9269735/ /pubmed/35808470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22134975 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rentz, Clara
Far, Mehran Sahandi
Boltes, Maik
Schnitzler, Alfons
Amunts, Katrin
Dukart, Juergen
Minnerop, Martina
System Comparison for Gait and Balance Monitoring Used for the Evaluation of a Home-Based Training
title System Comparison for Gait and Balance Monitoring Used for the Evaluation of a Home-Based Training
title_full System Comparison for Gait and Balance Monitoring Used for the Evaluation of a Home-Based Training
title_fullStr System Comparison for Gait and Balance Monitoring Used for the Evaluation of a Home-Based Training
title_full_unstemmed System Comparison for Gait and Balance Monitoring Used for the Evaluation of a Home-Based Training
title_short System Comparison for Gait and Balance Monitoring Used for the Evaluation of a Home-Based Training
title_sort system comparison for gait and balance monitoring used for the evaluation of a home-based training
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9269735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35808470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22134975
work_keys_str_mv AT rentzclara systemcomparisonforgaitandbalancemonitoringusedfortheevaluationofahomebasedtraining
AT farmehransahandi systemcomparisonforgaitandbalancemonitoringusedfortheevaluationofahomebasedtraining
AT boltesmaik systemcomparisonforgaitandbalancemonitoringusedfortheevaluationofahomebasedtraining
AT schnitzleralfons systemcomparisonforgaitandbalancemonitoringusedfortheevaluationofahomebasedtraining
AT amuntskatrin systemcomparisonforgaitandbalancemonitoringusedfortheevaluationofahomebasedtraining
AT dukartjuergen systemcomparisonforgaitandbalancemonitoringusedfortheevaluationofahomebasedtraining
AT minneropmartina systemcomparisonforgaitandbalancemonitoringusedfortheevaluationofahomebasedtraining