Cargando…
A Novel Approach to Non-Destructive Rubber Vulcanization Monitoring by the Transient Radar Method
Rubber is one of the most used materials in the world; however, raw rubber shows a relatively very low mechanical strength. Therefore, it needs to be cured before its ultimate applicatios. Curing process specifications, such as the curing time and temperature, influence the material properties of th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9269798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35808504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22135010 |
_version_ | 1784744309796372480 |
---|---|
author | Tayebi, Salar Pourkazemi, Ali Patino, Nicolas Ospitia Thibaut, Kato Kamami, Olsi Stiens, Johan |
author_facet | Tayebi, Salar Pourkazemi, Ali Patino, Nicolas Ospitia Thibaut, Kato Kamami, Olsi Stiens, Johan |
author_sort | Tayebi, Salar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rubber is one of the most used materials in the world; however, raw rubber shows a relatively very low mechanical strength. Therefore, it needs to be cured before its ultimate applicatios. Curing process specifications, such as the curing time and temperature, influence the material properties of the final cured product. The transient radar method (TRM) is introduced as an alternative for vulcanization monitoring in this study. Three polyurethane-rubber samples with different curing times of 2, 4, and 5.5 min were studied by TRM to investigate the feasibility and robustness of the TRM in curing time monitoring. Additionally, the mechanical stiffness of the samples was investigated by using a unidirectional tensile test to investigate the potential correlations between curing time, dielectric permittivity, and stiffness. According to the results, the complex permittivity and stiffness of the samples with 2, 4, and 5.5 min of curing time was 17.33 ± 0.07 − (2.41 ± 0.04)j; 17.09 ± 0.05 − (4.90 ± 0.03)j; 23.60 ± 0.05 − (14.06 ± 0.06)j; and 0.29, 0.35, and 0.38 kPa, respectively. Further statistical analyses showed a correlation coefficient of 0.99 (p = 0.06), 0.80 (p = 0.40), and 0.92 (p = 0.25) between curing time–stiffness, curing time–permittivity (real part), and curing time–permittivity (imaginary part), respectively. The correlation coefficient between curing time and permittivity can show the potential of the TRM system in contact-free vulcanization monitoring, as the impact of vulcanization can be tracked by means of TRM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9269798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92697982022-07-09 A Novel Approach to Non-Destructive Rubber Vulcanization Monitoring by the Transient Radar Method Tayebi, Salar Pourkazemi, Ali Patino, Nicolas Ospitia Thibaut, Kato Kamami, Olsi Stiens, Johan Sensors (Basel) Article Rubber is one of the most used materials in the world; however, raw rubber shows a relatively very low mechanical strength. Therefore, it needs to be cured before its ultimate applicatios. Curing process specifications, such as the curing time and temperature, influence the material properties of the final cured product. The transient radar method (TRM) is introduced as an alternative for vulcanization monitoring in this study. Three polyurethane-rubber samples with different curing times of 2, 4, and 5.5 min were studied by TRM to investigate the feasibility and robustness of the TRM in curing time monitoring. Additionally, the mechanical stiffness of the samples was investigated by using a unidirectional tensile test to investigate the potential correlations between curing time, dielectric permittivity, and stiffness. According to the results, the complex permittivity and stiffness of the samples with 2, 4, and 5.5 min of curing time was 17.33 ± 0.07 − (2.41 ± 0.04)j; 17.09 ± 0.05 − (4.90 ± 0.03)j; 23.60 ± 0.05 − (14.06 ± 0.06)j; and 0.29, 0.35, and 0.38 kPa, respectively. Further statistical analyses showed a correlation coefficient of 0.99 (p = 0.06), 0.80 (p = 0.40), and 0.92 (p = 0.25) between curing time–stiffness, curing time–permittivity (real part), and curing time–permittivity (imaginary part), respectively. The correlation coefficient between curing time and permittivity can show the potential of the TRM system in contact-free vulcanization monitoring, as the impact of vulcanization can be tracked by means of TRM. MDPI 2022-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9269798/ /pubmed/35808504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22135010 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tayebi, Salar Pourkazemi, Ali Patino, Nicolas Ospitia Thibaut, Kato Kamami, Olsi Stiens, Johan A Novel Approach to Non-Destructive Rubber Vulcanization Monitoring by the Transient Radar Method |
title | A Novel Approach to Non-Destructive Rubber Vulcanization Monitoring by the Transient Radar Method |
title_full | A Novel Approach to Non-Destructive Rubber Vulcanization Monitoring by the Transient Radar Method |
title_fullStr | A Novel Approach to Non-Destructive Rubber Vulcanization Monitoring by the Transient Radar Method |
title_full_unstemmed | A Novel Approach to Non-Destructive Rubber Vulcanization Monitoring by the Transient Radar Method |
title_short | A Novel Approach to Non-Destructive Rubber Vulcanization Monitoring by the Transient Radar Method |
title_sort | novel approach to non-destructive rubber vulcanization monitoring by the transient radar method |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9269798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35808504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22135010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tayebisalar anovelapproachtonondestructiverubbervulcanizationmonitoringbythetransientradarmethod AT pourkazemiali anovelapproachtonondestructiverubbervulcanizationmonitoringbythetransientradarmethod AT patinonicolasospitia anovelapproachtonondestructiverubbervulcanizationmonitoringbythetransientradarmethod AT thibautkato anovelapproachtonondestructiverubbervulcanizationmonitoringbythetransientradarmethod AT kamamiolsi anovelapproachtonondestructiverubbervulcanizationmonitoringbythetransientradarmethod AT stiensjohan anovelapproachtonondestructiverubbervulcanizationmonitoringbythetransientradarmethod AT tayebisalar novelapproachtonondestructiverubbervulcanizationmonitoringbythetransientradarmethod AT pourkazemiali novelapproachtonondestructiverubbervulcanizationmonitoringbythetransientradarmethod AT patinonicolasospitia novelapproachtonondestructiverubbervulcanizationmonitoringbythetransientradarmethod AT thibautkato novelapproachtonondestructiverubbervulcanizationmonitoringbythetransientradarmethod AT kamamiolsi novelapproachtonondestructiverubbervulcanizationmonitoringbythetransientradarmethod AT stiensjohan novelapproachtonondestructiverubbervulcanizationmonitoringbythetransientradarmethod |