Cargando…

Is levator ani avulsion a risk factor for prolapse recurrence? A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Levator ani muscle avulsion as a risk factor for prolapse recurrence is not well established. This systematic review was aimed at evaluating the correlation between levator ani avulsion and postoperative prolapse recurrence with meta-analysis, specifically, the risk of s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yeung, Ellen, Malacova, Eva, Maher, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9270296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35538253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05217-2
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Levator ani muscle avulsion as a risk factor for prolapse recurrence is not well established. This systematic review was aimed at evaluating the correlation between levator ani avulsion and postoperative prolapse recurrence with meta-analysis, specifically, the risk of subjective or objective prolapse recurrence and reoperation. METHODS: The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number CRD42021256675). A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify all peer-reviewed studies that described levator avulsion in women and investigated operative and postoperative outcomes. All peer-reviewed, English-language cohort studies in those with and without levator avulsion with a minimum of 3 months’ follow-up were included. Pooled unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios were calculated for subjective recurrence, objective recurrence and rates of re-operation. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies (RoBINS) and The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tools were used to assess the quality of the studies included. RESULTS: Twelve studies with a total of 2,637 subjects and a follow-up period 0.3–6.4 years were identified. There were insufficient data to report a pooled adjusted risk for subjective recurrence and reoperation. On low to moderate quality-adjusted data, the pooled odds of objective recurrence was not significantly associated with levator ani avulsion (aOR 1.68; 95% CI 0.78–3.66). CONCLUSION: Levator ani avulsion has not been confirmed as a risk factor for objective prolapse recurrence. Further evidence is needed to investigate the correlation between levator ani avulsion and the risk of subjective recurrence and reoperation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00192-022-05217-2