Cargando…
Is levator ani avulsion a risk factor for prolapse recurrence? A systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Levator ani muscle avulsion as a risk factor for prolapse recurrence is not well established. This systematic review was aimed at evaluating the correlation between levator ani avulsion and postoperative prolapse recurrence with meta-analysis, specifically, the risk of s...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9270296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35538253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05217-2 |
_version_ | 1784744431573794816 |
---|---|
author | Yeung, Ellen Malacova, Eva Maher, Christopher |
author_facet | Yeung, Ellen Malacova, Eva Maher, Christopher |
author_sort | Yeung, Ellen |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Levator ani muscle avulsion as a risk factor for prolapse recurrence is not well established. This systematic review was aimed at evaluating the correlation between levator ani avulsion and postoperative prolapse recurrence with meta-analysis, specifically, the risk of subjective or objective prolapse recurrence and reoperation. METHODS: The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number CRD42021256675). A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify all peer-reviewed studies that described levator avulsion in women and investigated operative and postoperative outcomes. All peer-reviewed, English-language cohort studies in those with and without levator avulsion with a minimum of 3 months’ follow-up were included. Pooled unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios were calculated for subjective recurrence, objective recurrence and rates of re-operation. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies (RoBINS) and The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tools were used to assess the quality of the studies included. RESULTS: Twelve studies with a total of 2,637 subjects and a follow-up period 0.3–6.4 years were identified. There were insufficient data to report a pooled adjusted risk for subjective recurrence and reoperation. On low to moderate quality-adjusted data, the pooled odds of objective recurrence was not significantly associated with levator ani avulsion (aOR 1.68; 95% CI 0.78–3.66). CONCLUSION: Levator ani avulsion has not been confirmed as a risk factor for objective prolapse recurrence. Further evidence is needed to investigate the correlation between levator ani avulsion and the risk of subjective recurrence and reoperation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00192-022-05217-2 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9270296 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92702962022-07-10 Is levator ani avulsion a risk factor for prolapse recurrence? A systematic review and meta-analysis Yeung, Ellen Malacova, Eva Maher, Christopher Int Urogynecol J Review Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Levator ani muscle avulsion as a risk factor for prolapse recurrence is not well established. This systematic review was aimed at evaluating the correlation between levator ani avulsion and postoperative prolapse recurrence with meta-analysis, specifically, the risk of subjective or objective prolapse recurrence and reoperation. METHODS: The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number CRD42021256675). A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify all peer-reviewed studies that described levator avulsion in women and investigated operative and postoperative outcomes. All peer-reviewed, English-language cohort studies in those with and without levator avulsion with a minimum of 3 months’ follow-up were included. Pooled unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios were calculated for subjective recurrence, objective recurrence and rates of re-operation. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies (RoBINS) and The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tools were used to assess the quality of the studies included. RESULTS: Twelve studies with a total of 2,637 subjects and a follow-up period 0.3–6.4 years were identified. There were insufficient data to report a pooled adjusted risk for subjective recurrence and reoperation. On low to moderate quality-adjusted data, the pooled odds of objective recurrence was not significantly associated with levator ani avulsion (aOR 1.68; 95% CI 0.78–3.66). CONCLUSION: Levator ani avulsion has not been confirmed as a risk factor for objective prolapse recurrence. Further evidence is needed to investigate the correlation between levator ani avulsion and the risk of subjective recurrence and reoperation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00192-022-05217-2 Springer International Publishing 2022-05-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9270296/ /pubmed/35538253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05217-2 Text en © Crown 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Yeung, Ellen Malacova, Eva Maher, Christopher Is levator ani avulsion a risk factor for prolapse recurrence? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Is levator ani avulsion a risk factor for prolapse recurrence? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Is levator ani avulsion a risk factor for prolapse recurrence? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Is levator ani avulsion a risk factor for prolapse recurrence? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Is levator ani avulsion a risk factor for prolapse recurrence? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Is levator ani avulsion a risk factor for prolapse recurrence? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | is levator ani avulsion a risk factor for prolapse recurrence? a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9270296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35538253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05217-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yeungellen islevatoraniavulsionariskfactorforprolapserecurrenceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT malacovaeva islevatoraniavulsionariskfactorforprolapserecurrenceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT maherchristopher islevatoraniavulsionariskfactorforprolapserecurrenceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |