Cargando…

Long-term outcome after routine surgery for pelvic organ prolapse—A national register-based cohort study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is common, and women have an estimated 12–19% lifetime risk for needing POP surgery. Aims were to measure re-operation rates up to 10 years after POP surgery and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) 5 years after a first-time operation for POP. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nüssler, Emil, Granåsen, Gabriel, Bixo, Marie, Löfgren, Mats
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9270303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35312802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05156-y
_version_ 1784744433497931776
author Nüssler, Emil
Granåsen, Gabriel
Bixo, Marie
Löfgren, Mats
author_facet Nüssler, Emil
Granåsen, Gabriel
Bixo, Marie
Löfgren, Mats
author_sort Nüssler, Emil
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is common, and women have an estimated 12–19% lifetime risk for needing POP surgery. Aims were to measure re-operation rates up to 10 years after POP surgery and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) 5 years after a first-time operation for POP. METHODS: This is a cohort study using the Swedish National Quality Register for Gynaecological Surgery (GynOp). We retrieved information from 32,086 POP-operated women up to 10 years later. After validation, a web-based PROM questionnaire was sent to 4380 women who 5 years previously had standard POP surgery. Main outcome measures were reoperations due to a relapse of prolapse and PROMs 5 years after the primary operation. RESULTS: Among women operated for all types of POP, 11% had re-operations 5 years later and an additional 4% 10 years later, with similar frequencies for various compartments/types of surgery. PROMs yielded a 75% response rate after 5 years. Cure rate was 68% for anterior, 70% for posterior, and 74% for combined anterior-posterior native repairs. Patient satisfaction exceeded 70%, and symptom reduction was still significant after 5 years (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Following primary prolapse surgery, re-operation rates are low, even after 10 years. A web-based survey for follow-up of PROMs after POP surgery is feasible and yields a high response rate after 5 years. The subjective cure rate after primary POP operations is high, with reduced symptoms and satisfied patients regardless of compartment. Standard prolapse surgery with native tissue repair produces satisfactory long-term results. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00192-022-05156-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9270303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92703032022-07-10 Long-term outcome after routine surgery for pelvic organ prolapse—A national register-based cohort study Nüssler, Emil Granåsen, Gabriel Bixo, Marie Löfgren, Mats Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is common, and women have an estimated 12–19% lifetime risk for needing POP surgery. Aims were to measure re-operation rates up to 10 years after POP surgery and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) 5 years after a first-time operation for POP. METHODS: This is a cohort study using the Swedish National Quality Register for Gynaecological Surgery (GynOp). We retrieved information from 32,086 POP-operated women up to 10 years later. After validation, a web-based PROM questionnaire was sent to 4380 women who 5 years previously had standard POP surgery. Main outcome measures were reoperations due to a relapse of prolapse and PROMs 5 years after the primary operation. RESULTS: Among women operated for all types of POP, 11% had re-operations 5 years later and an additional 4% 10 years later, with similar frequencies for various compartments/types of surgery. PROMs yielded a 75% response rate after 5 years. Cure rate was 68% for anterior, 70% for posterior, and 74% for combined anterior-posterior native repairs. Patient satisfaction exceeded 70%, and symptom reduction was still significant after 5 years (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Following primary prolapse surgery, re-operation rates are low, even after 10 years. A web-based survey for follow-up of PROMs after POP surgery is feasible and yields a high response rate after 5 years. The subjective cure rate after primary POP operations is high, with reduced symptoms and satisfied patients regardless of compartment. Standard prolapse surgery with native tissue repair produces satisfactory long-term results. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00192-022-05156-y. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-21 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9270303/ /pubmed/35312802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05156-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Nüssler, Emil
Granåsen, Gabriel
Bixo, Marie
Löfgren, Mats
Long-term outcome after routine surgery for pelvic organ prolapse—A national register-based cohort study
title Long-term outcome after routine surgery for pelvic organ prolapse—A national register-based cohort study
title_full Long-term outcome after routine surgery for pelvic organ prolapse—A national register-based cohort study
title_fullStr Long-term outcome after routine surgery for pelvic organ prolapse—A national register-based cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Long-term outcome after routine surgery for pelvic organ prolapse—A national register-based cohort study
title_short Long-term outcome after routine surgery for pelvic organ prolapse—A national register-based cohort study
title_sort long-term outcome after routine surgery for pelvic organ prolapse—a national register-based cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9270303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35312802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05156-y
work_keys_str_mv AT nussleremil longtermoutcomeafterroutinesurgeryforpelvicorganprolapseanationalregisterbasedcohortstudy
AT granasengabriel longtermoutcomeafterroutinesurgeryforpelvicorganprolapseanationalregisterbasedcohortstudy
AT bixomarie longtermoutcomeafterroutinesurgeryforpelvicorganprolapseanationalregisterbasedcohortstudy
AT lofgrenmats longtermoutcomeafterroutinesurgeryforpelvicorganprolapseanationalregisterbasedcohortstudy