Cargando…
Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software
This study aimed to investigate deep convolutional neural network- (DCNN-) based artificial intelligence (AI) model using cephalometric images for the classification of sagittal skeletal relationships and compare the performance of the newly developed DCNN-based AI model with that of the automated-t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9270345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15856-6 |
_version_ | 1784744446043095040 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Ho-Jin Kim, Kyoung Dong Kim, Do-Hoon |
author_facet | Kim, Ho-Jin Kim, Kyoung Dong Kim, Do-Hoon |
author_sort | Kim, Ho-Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to investigate deep convolutional neural network- (DCNN-) based artificial intelligence (AI) model using cephalometric images for the classification of sagittal skeletal relationships and compare the performance of the newly developed DCNN-based AI model with that of the automated-tracing AI software. A total of 1574 cephalometric images were included and classified based on the A-point-Nasion- (N-) point-B-point (ANB) angle (Class I being 0–4°, Class II > 4°, and Class III < 0°). The DCNN-based AI model was developed using training (1334 images) and validation (120 images) sets with a standard classification label for the individual images. A test set of 120 images was used to compare the AI models. The agreement of the DCNN-based AI model or the automated-tracing AI software with a standard classification label was measured using Cohen’s kappa coefficient (0.913 for the DCNN-based AI model; 0.775 for the automated-tracing AI software). In terms of their performances, the micro-average values of the DCNN-based AI model (sensitivity, 0.94; specificity, 0.97; precision, 0.94; accuracy, 0.96) were higher than those of the automated-tracing AI software (sensitivity, 0.85; specificity, 0.93; precision, 0.85; accuracy, 0.90). With regard to the sagittal skeletal classification using cephalometric images, the DCNN-based AI model outperformed the automated-tracing AI software. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9270345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92703452022-07-10 Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software Kim, Ho-Jin Kim, Kyoung Dong Kim, Do-Hoon Sci Rep Article This study aimed to investigate deep convolutional neural network- (DCNN-) based artificial intelligence (AI) model using cephalometric images for the classification of sagittal skeletal relationships and compare the performance of the newly developed DCNN-based AI model with that of the automated-tracing AI software. A total of 1574 cephalometric images were included and classified based on the A-point-Nasion- (N-) point-B-point (ANB) angle (Class I being 0–4°, Class II > 4°, and Class III < 0°). The DCNN-based AI model was developed using training (1334 images) and validation (120 images) sets with a standard classification label for the individual images. A test set of 120 images was used to compare the AI models. The agreement of the DCNN-based AI model or the automated-tracing AI software with a standard classification label was measured using Cohen’s kappa coefficient (0.913 for the DCNN-based AI model; 0.775 for the automated-tracing AI software). In terms of their performances, the micro-average values of the DCNN-based AI model (sensitivity, 0.94; specificity, 0.97; precision, 0.94; accuracy, 0.96) were higher than those of the automated-tracing AI software (sensitivity, 0.85; specificity, 0.93; precision, 0.85; accuracy, 0.90). With regard to the sagittal skeletal classification using cephalometric images, the DCNN-based AI model outperformed the automated-tracing AI software. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9270345/ /pubmed/35804075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15856-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Kim, Ho-Jin Kim, Kyoung Dong Kim, Do-Hoon Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software |
title | Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software |
title_full | Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software |
title_fullStr | Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software |
title_short | Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software |
title_sort | deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9270345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15856-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimhojin deepconvolutionalneuralnetworkbasedskeletalclassificationofcephalometricimagecomparedwithautomatedtracingsoftware AT kimkyoungdong deepconvolutionalneuralnetworkbasedskeletalclassificationofcephalometricimagecomparedwithautomatedtracingsoftware AT kimdohoon deepconvolutionalneuralnetworkbasedskeletalclassificationofcephalometricimagecomparedwithautomatedtracingsoftware |