Cargando…

Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software

This study aimed to investigate deep convolutional neural network- (DCNN-) based artificial intelligence (AI) model using cephalometric images for the classification of sagittal skeletal relationships and compare the performance of the newly developed DCNN-based AI model with that of the automated-t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Ho-Jin, Kim, Kyoung Dong, Kim, Do-Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9270345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15856-6
_version_ 1784744446043095040
author Kim, Ho-Jin
Kim, Kyoung Dong
Kim, Do-Hoon
author_facet Kim, Ho-Jin
Kim, Kyoung Dong
Kim, Do-Hoon
author_sort Kim, Ho-Jin
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to investigate deep convolutional neural network- (DCNN-) based artificial intelligence (AI) model using cephalometric images for the classification of sagittal skeletal relationships and compare the performance of the newly developed DCNN-based AI model with that of the automated-tracing AI software. A total of 1574 cephalometric images were included and classified based on the A-point-Nasion- (N-) point-B-point (ANB) angle (Class I being 0–4°, Class II > 4°, and Class III < 0°). The DCNN-based AI model was developed using training (1334 images) and validation (120 images) sets with a standard classification label for the individual images. A test set of 120 images was used to compare the AI models. The agreement of the DCNN-based AI model or the automated-tracing AI software with a standard classification label was measured using Cohen’s kappa coefficient (0.913 for the DCNN-based AI model; 0.775 for the automated-tracing AI software). In terms of their performances, the micro-average values of the DCNN-based AI model (sensitivity, 0.94; specificity, 0.97; precision, 0.94; accuracy, 0.96) were higher than those of the automated-tracing AI software (sensitivity, 0.85; specificity, 0.93; precision, 0.85; accuracy, 0.90). With regard to the sagittal skeletal classification using cephalometric images, the DCNN-based AI model outperformed the automated-tracing AI software.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9270345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92703452022-07-10 Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software Kim, Ho-Jin Kim, Kyoung Dong Kim, Do-Hoon Sci Rep Article This study aimed to investigate deep convolutional neural network- (DCNN-) based artificial intelligence (AI) model using cephalometric images for the classification of sagittal skeletal relationships and compare the performance of the newly developed DCNN-based AI model with that of the automated-tracing AI software. A total of 1574 cephalometric images were included and classified based on the A-point-Nasion- (N-) point-B-point (ANB) angle (Class I being 0–4°, Class II > 4°, and Class III < 0°). The DCNN-based AI model was developed using training (1334 images) and validation (120 images) sets with a standard classification label for the individual images. A test set of 120 images was used to compare the AI models. The agreement of the DCNN-based AI model or the automated-tracing AI software with a standard classification label was measured using Cohen’s kappa coefficient (0.913 for the DCNN-based AI model; 0.775 for the automated-tracing AI software). In terms of their performances, the micro-average values of the DCNN-based AI model (sensitivity, 0.94; specificity, 0.97; precision, 0.94; accuracy, 0.96) were higher than those of the automated-tracing AI software (sensitivity, 0.85; specificity, 0.93; precision, 0.85; accuracy, 0.90). With regard to the sagittal skeletal classification using cephalometric images, the DCNN-based AI model outperformed the automated-tracing AI software. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9270345/ /pubmed/35804075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15856-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Ho-Jin
Kim, Kyoung Dong
Kim, Do-Hoon
Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software
title Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software
title_full Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software
title_fullStr Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software
title_full_unstemmed Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software
title_short Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software
title_sort deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9270345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15856-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhojin deepconvolutionalneuralnetworkbasedskeletalclassificationofcephalometricimagecomparedwithautomatedtracingsoftware
AT kimkyoungdong deepconvolutionalneuralnetworkbasedskeletalclassificationofcephalometricimagecomparedwithautomatedtracingsoftware
AT kimdohoon deepconvolutionalneuralnetworkbasedskeletalclassificationofcephalometricimagecomparedwithautomatedtracingsoftware