Cargando…
Evaluation of long‐term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair
AIM: This study has two aims: to evaluate long‐term chronic pain and complications after circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (C‐TAPP) and compare outcomes of unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernia cases. METHODS: A postoperative patient questionnaire was used to e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12556 |
_version_ | 1784744588880117760 |
---|---|
author | Hayakawa, Shunsuke Hayakawa, Tetsushi Watanabe, Kaori Saito, Kenta Miyai, Hirotaka Ogawa, Ryo Yamamoto, Minoru Kobayashi, Kenji Takiguchi, Shuji Tanaka, Moritsugu |
author_facet | Hayakawa, Shunsuke Hayakawa, Tetsushi Watanabe, Kaori Saito, Kenta Miyai, Hirotaka Ogawa, Ryo Yamamoto, Minoru Kobayashi, Kenji Takiguchi, Shuji Tanaka, Moritsugu |
author_sort | Hayakawa, Shunsuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: This study has two aims: to evaluate long‐term chronic pain and complications after circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (C‐TAPP) and compare outcomes of unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernia cases. METHODS: A postoperative patient questionnaire was used to evaluate pain and complications in 1546 patients who underwent C‐TAPP for simple inguinal hernia. Questions concerned satisfaction with surgery, pain at rest, pain at movement, mesh discomfort on a 10‐point scale, and complications, such as recurrence. Patients were classified into unilateral (U Group) and bilateral (B Group) groups, and propensity score matching was performed to compare long‐term chronic pain and complications. RESULTS: The questionnaire return rates were 77.5% (1034 cases) and 79.9% (135 cases) in unilateral and bilateral cases. The frequency of moderate‐to‐severe (≥4 points) pain at rest, pain at movement, and mesh discomfort were 3.2%, 3.6%, and 4.5%, respectively. After propensity score matching, no significant differences in pain at rest (P = .726), at movement (P = .712), or mesh discomfort (P = .981) were detected between the U and B groups. Postoperative complications occurred in 2.1% of all patients, and the recurrence rate was 0.3%. In the post‐match comparison, no differences in complications with Clavian‐Dindo classification ≥III (U Group 0.7%, B Group 2.1%, P = .622) were detected. CONCLUSION: C‐TAPP, which focuses on the layered structure, showed acceptable results for long‐term chronic pain. Bilateral cases did not have worse pain or complications compared to unilateral cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9271018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92710182022-07-14 Evaluation of long‐term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair Hayakawa, Shunsuke Hayakawa, Tetsushi Watanabe, Kaori Saito, Kenta Miyai, Hirotaka Ogawa, Ryo Yamamoto, Minoru Kobayashi, Kenji Takiguchi, Shuji Tanaka, Moritsugu Ann Gastroenterol Surg Original Articles AIM: This study has two aims: to evaluate long‐term chronic pain and complications after circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (C‐TAPP) and compare outcomes of unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernia cases. METHODS: A postoperative patient questionnaire was used to evaluate pain and complications in 1546 patients who underwent C‐TAPP for simple inguinal hernia. Questions concerned satisfaction with surgery, pain at rest, pain at movement, mesh discomfort on a 10‐point scale, and complications, such as recurrence. Patients were classified into unilateral (U Group) and bilateral (B Group) groups, and propensity score matching was performed to compare long‐term chronic pain and complications. RESULTS: The questionnaire return rates were 77.5% (1034 cases) and 79.9% (135 cases) in unilateral and bilateral cases. The frequency of moderate‐to‐severe (≥4 points) pain at rest, pain at movement, and mesh discomfort were 3.2%, 3.6%, and 4.5%, respectively. After propensity score matching, no significant differences in pain at rest (P = .726), at movement (P = .712), or mesh discomfort (P = .981) were detected between the U and B groups. Postoperative complications occurred in 2.1% of all patients, and the recurrence rate was 0.3%. In the post‐match comparison, no differences in complications with Clavian‐Dindo classification ≥III (U Group 0.7%, B Group 2.1%, P = .622) were detected. CONCLUSION: C‐TAPP, which focuses on the layered structure, showed acceptable results for long‐term chronic pain. Bilateral cases did not have worse pain or complications compared to unilateral cases. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9271018/ /pubmed/35847434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12556 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Hayakawa, Shunsuke Hayakawa, Tetsushi Watanabe, Kaori Saito, Kenta Miyai, Hirotaka Ogawa, Ryo Yamamoto, Minoru Kobayashi, Kenji Takiguchi, Shuji Tanaka, Moritsugu Evaluation of long‐term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair |
title | Evaluation of long‐term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair |
title_full | Evaluation of long‐term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of long‐term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of long‐term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair |
title_short | Evaluation of long‐term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair |
title_sort | evaluation of long‐term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12556 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hayakawashunsuke evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair AT hayakawatetsushi evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair AT watanabekaori evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair AT saitokenta evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair AT miyaihirotaka evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair AT ogawaryo evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair AT yamamotominoru evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair AT kobayashikenji evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair AT takiguchishuji evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair AT tanakamoritsugu evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair |