Cargando…

Evaluation of long‐term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

AIM: This study has two aims: to evaluate long‐term chronic pain and complications after circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (C‐TAPP) and compare outcomes of unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernia cases. METHODS: A postoperative patient questionnaire was used to e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayakawa, Shunsuke, Hayakawa, Tetsushi, Watanabe, Kaori, Saito, Kenta, Miyai, Hirotaka, Ogawa, Ryo, Yamamoto, Minoru, Kobayashi, Kenji, Takiguchi, Shuji, Tanaka, Moritsugu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12556
_version_ 1784744588880117760
author Hayakawa, Shunsuke
Hayakawa, Tetsushi
Watanabe, Kaori
Saito, Kenta
Miyai, Hirotaka
Ogawa, Ryo
Yamamoto, Minoru
Kobayashi, Kenji
Takiguchi, Shuji
Tanaka, Moritsugu
author_facet Hayakawa, Shunsuke
Hayakawa, Tetsushi
Watanabe, Kaori
Saito, Kenta
Miyai, Hirotaka
Ogawa, Ryo
Yamamoto, Minoru
Kobayashi, Kenji
Takiguchi, Shuji
Tanaka, Moritsugu
author_sort Hayakawa, Shunsuke
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study has two aims: to evaluate long‐term chronic pain and complications after circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (C‐TAPP) and compare outcomes of unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernia cases. METHODS: A postoperative patient questionnaire was used to evaluate pain and complications in 1546 patients who underwent C‐TAPP for simple inguinal hernia. Questions concerned satisfaction with surgery, pain at rest, pain at movement, mesh discomfort on a 10‐point scale, and complications, such as recurrence. Patients were classified into unilateral (U Group) and bilateral (B Group) groups, and propensity score matching was performed to compare long‐term chronic pain and complications. RESULTS: The questionnaire return rates were 77.5% (1034 cases) and 79.9% (135 cases) in unilateral and bilateral cases. The frequency of moderate‐to‐severe (≥4 points) pain at rest, pain at movement, and mesh discomfort were 3.2%, 3.6%, and 4.5%, respectively. After propensity score matching, no significant differences in pain at rest (P = .726), at movement (P = .712), or mesh discomfort (P = .981) were detected between the U and B groups. Postoperative complications occurred in 2.1% of all patients, and the recurrence rate was 0.3%. In the post‐match comparison, no differences in complications with Clavian‐Dindo classification ≥III (U Group 0.7%, B Group 2.1%, P = .622) were detected. CONCLUSION: C‐TAPP, which focuses on the layered structure, showed acceptable results for long‐term chronic pain. Bilateral cases did not have worse pain or complications compared to unilateral cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9271018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92710182022-07-14 Evaluation of long‐term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair Hayakawa, Shunsuke Hayakawa, Tetsushi Watanabe, Kaori Saito, Kenta Miyai, Hirotaka Ogawa, Ryo Yamamoto, Minoru Kobayashi, Kenji Takiguchi, Shuji Tanaka, Moritsugu Ann Gastroenterol Surg Original Articles AIM: This study has two aims: to evaluate long‐term chronic pain and complications after circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (C‐TAPP) and compare outcomes of unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernia cases. METHODS: A postoperative patient questionnaire was used to evaluate pain and complications in 1546 patients who underwent C‐TAPP for simple inguinal hernia. Questions concerned satisfaction with surgery, pain at rest, pain at movement, mesh discomfort on a 10‐point scale, and complications, such as recurrence. Patients were classified into unilateral (U Group) and bilateral (B Group) groups, and propensity score matching was performed to compare long‐term chronic pain and complications. RESULTS: The questionnaire return rates were 77.5% (1034 cases) and 79.9% (135 cases) in unilateral and bilateral cases. The frequency of moderate‐to‐severe (≥4 points) pain at rest, pain at movement, and mesh discomfort were 3.2%, 3.6%, and 4.5%, respectively. After propensity score matching, no significant differences in pain at rest (P = .726), at movement (P = .712), or mesh discomfort (P = .981) were detected between the U and B groups. Postoperative complications occurred in 2.1% of all patients, and the recurrence rate was 0.3%. In the post‐match comparison, no differences in complications with Clavian‐Dindo classification ≥III (U Group 0.7%, B Group 2.1%, P = .622) were detected. CONCLUSION: C‐TAPP, which focuses on the layered structure, showed acceptable results for long‐term chronic pain. Bilateral cases did not have worse pain or complications compared to unilateral cases. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9271018/ /pubmed/35847434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12556 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hayakawa, Shunsuke
Hayakawa, Tetsushi
Watanabe, Kaori
Saito, Kenta
Miyai, Hirotaka
Ogawa, Ryo
Yamamoto, Minoru
Kobayashi, Kenji
Takiguchi, Shuji
Tanaka, Moritsugu
Evaluation of long‐term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair
title Evaluation of long‐term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair
title_full Evaluation of long‐term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair
title_fullStr Evaluation of long‐term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of long‐term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair
title_short Evaluation of long‐term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair
title_sort evaluation of long‐term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12556
work_keys_str_mv AT hayakawashunsuke evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair
AT hayakawatetsushi evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair
AT watanabekaori evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair
AT saitokenta evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair
AT miyaihirotaka evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair
AT ogawaryo evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair
AT yamamotominoru evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair
AT kobayashikenji evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair
AT takiguchishuji evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair
AT tanakamoritsugu evaluationoflongtermchronicpainandoutcomesforunilateralvsbilateralcircularincisiontransabdominalpreperitonealinguinalherniarepair