Cargando…

Long‐term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma with propensity score matching

BACKGROUND: Combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC‐CCA) is a rare primary hepatic neoplasm. Currently, there are no well‐structured studies that analyze the feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection in cHCC‐CCA alone. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the long‐term surviva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Seung Jae, Kang, So Hyun, Choi, YoungRok, Lee, Boram, Hong, Suk Kyun, Cho, Jai Young, Yi, Nam‐Joon, Lee, Kwang‐Woong, Suh, Kyung‐Suk, Han, Ho‐Seong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12555
_version_ 1784744589641383936
author Lee, Seung Jae
Kang, So Hyun
Choi, YoungRok
Lee, Boram
Hong, Suk Kyun
Cho, Jai Young
Yi, Nam‐Joon
Lee, Kwang‐Woong
Suh, Kyung‐Suk
Han, Ho‐Seong
author_facet Lee, Seung Jae
Kang, So Hyun
Choi, YoungRok
Lee, Boram
Hong, Suk Kyun
Cho, Jai Young
Yi, Nam‐Joon
Lee, Kwang‐Woong
Suh, Kyung‐Suk
Han, Ho‐Seong
author_sort Lee, Seung Jae
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC‐CCA) is a rare primary hepatic neoplasm. Currently, there are no well‐structured studies that analyze the feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection in cHCC‐CCA alone. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the long‐term survival of laparoscopic liver resection with open liver resection in cHCC‐CCA. METHODS: Patients with a postoperative pathologic report of cHCC‐CCA who underwent liver resection from August 2004 to December 2017 were included in this study. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed to analyze the 3‐y disease‐free survival and 3‐y overall survival. Propensity score matching was done to reduce the influence of confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients were pathologically confirmed to have cHCC‐CCA, of which 10 patients were excluded due to having received palliative surgery. Of the remaining 135 patients, 43 underwent laparoscopic and 92 underwent open liver resection; propensity score matching yielded 30 patients for each group. The 3‐y overall survival was 38 (88.4%) in the laparoscopic group and 84 (91.3%) in the open group before propensity score matching (P = .678), and 25 (83.3%) and 28 (93.3%), respectively, after matching (P = .257). The 3‐y disease‐free survival was 24 (55.8%) in the laparoscopic group and 32 (34.8%) in the open group before matching (P = .040), and 17 (56.7%) and 16 (53.3%), respectively, after matching (P = .958). The hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group before and after matching, while other operative outcomes were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic liver resection for cHCC‐CCA is technically feasible and safe, having a shorter hospital stay without compromising oncological outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9271021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92710212022-07-14 Long‐term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma with propensity score matching Lee, Seung Jae Kang, So Hyun Choi, YoungRok Lee, Boram Hong, Suk Kyun Cho, Jai Young Yi, Nam‐Joon Lee, Kwang‐Woong Suh, Kyung‐Suk Han, Ho‐Seong Ann Gastroenterol Surg Original Articles BACKGROUND: Combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC‐CCA) is a rare primary hepatic neoplasm. Currently, there are no well‐structured studies that analyze the feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection in cHCC‐CCA alone. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the long‐term survival of laparoscopic liver resection with open liver resection in cHCC‐CCA. METHODS: Patients with a postoperative pathologic report of cHCC‐CCA who underwent liver resection from August 2004 to December 2017 were included in this study. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed to analyze the 3‐y disease‐free survival and 3‐y overall survival. Propensity score matching was done to reduce the influence of confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients were pathologically confirmed to have cHCC‐CCA, of which 10 patients were excluded due to having received palliative surgery. Of the remaining 135 patients, 43 underwent laparoscopic and 92 underwent open liver resection; propensity score matching yielded 30 patients for each group. The 3‐y overall survival was 38 (88.4%) in the laparoscopic group and 84 (91.3%) in the open group before propensity score matching (P = .678), and 25 (83.3%) and 28 (93.3%), respectively, after matching (P = .257). The 3‐y disease‐free survival was 24 (55.8%) in the laparoscopic group and 32 (34.8%) in the open group before matching (P = .040), and 17 (56.7%) and 16 (53.3%), respectively, after matching (P = .958). The hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group before and after matching, while other operative outcomes were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic liver resection for cHCC‐CCA is technically feasible and safe, having a shorter hospital stay without compromising oncological outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9271021/ /pubmed/35847442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12555 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lee, Seung Jae
Kang, So Hyun
Choi, YoungRok
Lee, Boram
Hong, Suk Kyun
Cho, Jai Young
Yi, Nam‐Joon
Lee, Kwang‐Woong
Suh, Kyung‐Suk
Han, Ho‐Seong
Long‐term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma with propensity score matching
title Long‐term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma with propensity score matching
title_full Long‐term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma with propensity score matching
title_fullStr Long‐term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma with propensity score matching
title_full_unstemmed Long‐term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma with propensity score matching
title_short Long‐term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma with propensity score matching
title_sort long‐term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma with propensity score matching
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12555
work_keys_str_mv AT leeseungjae longtermoutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopenliverresectionforintrahepaticcombinedhepatocellularcholangiocarcinomawithpropensityscorematching
AT kangsohyun longtermoutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopenliverresectionforintrahepaticcombinedhepatocellularcholangiocarcinomawithpropensityscorematching
AT choiyoungrok longtermoutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopenliverresectionforintrahepaticcombinedhepatocellularcholangiocarcinomawithpropensityscorematching
AT leeboram longtermoutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopenliverresectionforintrahepaticcombinedhepatocellularcholangiocarcinomawithpropensityscorematching
AT hongsukkyun longtermoutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopenliverresectionforintrahepaticcombinedhepatocellularcholangiocarcinomawithpropensityscorematching
AT chojaiyoung longtermoutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopenliverresectionforintrahepaticcombinedhepatocellularcholangiocarcinomawithpropensityscorematching
AT yinamjoon longtermoutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopenliverresectionforintrahepaticcombinedhepatocellularcholangiocarcinomawithpropensityscorematching
AT leekwangwoong longtermoutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopenliverresectionforintrahepaticcombinedhepatocellularcholangiocarcinomawithpropensityscorematching
AT suhkyungsuk longtermoutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopenliverresectionforintrahepaticcombinedhepatocellularcholangiocarcinomawithpropensityscorematching
AT hanhoseong longtermoutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopenliverresectionforintrahepaticcombinedhepatocellularcholangiocarcinomawithpropensityscorematching