Cargando…
Comparison of cardiac volumetry using real-time MRI during free-breathing with standard cine MRI during breath-hold in children
BACKGROUND: Cardiac real-time magnetic resonance imaging (RT-MRI) provides high-quality images even during free-breathing. Difficulties in post-processing impede its use in clinical routine. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility of quantitative analysis of cardiac free-breathing RT-MRI and to co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35353211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-022-05327-5 |
_version_ | 1784744612681744384 |
---|---|
author | Röwer, Lena Maria Radke, Karl Ludger Hußmann, Janina Malik, Halima Uelwer, Tobias Voit, Dirk Frahm, Jens Wittsack, Hans-Joerg Harmeling, Stefan Pillekamp, Frank Klee, Dirk |
author_facet | Röwer, Lena Maria Radke, Karl Ludger Hußmann, Janina Malik, Halima Uelwer, Tobias Voit, Dirk Frahm, Jens Wittsack, Hans-Joerg Harmeling, Stefan Pillekamp, Frank Klee, Dirk |
author_sort | Röwer, Lena Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cardiac real-time magnetic resonance imaging (RT-MRI) provides high-quality images even during free-breathing. Difficulties in post-processing impede its use in clinical routine. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility of quantitative analysis of cardiac free-breathing RT-MRI and to compare image quality and volumetry during free-breathing RT-MRI in pediatric patients to standard breath-hold cine MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pediatric patients (n = 22) received cardiac RT-MRI volumetry during free breathing (1.5 T; short axis; 30 frames per s) in addition to standard breath-hold cine imaging in end-expiration. Real-time images were binned retrospectively based on electrocardiography and respiratory bellows. Image quality and volumetry were compared using the European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance registry score, structure visibility rating, linear regression and Bland–Altman analyses. RESULTS: Additional time for binning of real-time images was 2 min. For both techniques, image quality was rated good to excellent. RT-MRI was significantly more robust against artifacts (P < 0.01). Linear regression revealed good correlations for the ventricular volumes. Bland–Altman plots showed a good limit of agreement (LoA) for end-diastolic volume (left ventricle [LV]: LoA -0.1 ± 2.7 ml/m(2), right ventricle [RV]: LoA -1.9 ± 3.4 ml/m(2)), end-systolic volume (LV: LoA 0.4 ± 1.9 ml/m(2), RV: LoA 0.6 ± 2.0 ml/m(2)), stroke volume (LV: LoA -0.5 ± 2.3 ml/m(2), RV: LoA -2.6 ± 3.3 ml/m(2)) and ejection fraction (LV: LoA -0.5 ± 1.6%, RV: LoA -2.1 ± 2.8%). CONCLUSION: Compared to standard cine MRI with breath hold, RT-MRI during free breathing with retrospective respiratory binning offers good image quality, reduced image artifacts enabling fast quantitative evaluations of ventricular volumes in clinical practice under physiological conditions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00247-022-05327-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9271116 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92711162022-07-11 Comparison of cardiac volumetry using real-time MRI during free-breathing with standard cine MRI during breath-hold in children Röwer, Lena Maria Radke, Karl Ludger Hußmann, Janina Malik, Halima Uelwer, Tobias Voit, Dirk Frahm, Jens Wittsack, Hans-Joerg Harmeling, Stefan Pillekamp, Frank Klee, Dirk Pediatr Radiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Cardiac real-time magnetic resonance imaging (RT-MRI) provides high-quality images even during free-breathing. Difficulties in post-processing impede its use in clinical routine. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility of quantitative analysis of cardiac free-breathing RT-MRI and to compare image quality and volumetry during free-breathing RT-MRI in pediatric patients to standard breath-hold cine MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pediatric patients (n = 22) received cardiac RT-MRI volumetry during free breathing (1.5 T; short axis; 30 frames per s) in addition to standard breath-hold cine imaging in end-expiration. Real-time images were binned retrospectively based on electrocardiography and respiratory bellows. Image quality and volumetry were compared using the European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance registry score, structure visibility rating, linear regression and Bland–Altman analyses. RESULTS: Additional time for binning of real-time images was 2 min. For both techniques, image quality was rated good to excellent. RT-MRI was significantly more robust against artifacts (P < 0.01). Linear regression revealed good correlations for the ventricular volumes. Bland–Altman plots showed a good limit of agreement (LoA) for end-diastolic volume (left ventricle [LV]: LoA -0.1 ± 2.7 ml/m(2), right ventricle [RV]: LoA -1.9 ± 3.4 ml/m(2)), end-systolic volume (LV: LoA 0.4 ± 1.9 ml/m(2), RV: LoA 0.6 ± 2.0 ml/m(2)), stroke volume (LV: LoA -0.5 ± 2.3 ml/m(2), RV: LoA -2.6 ± 3.3 ml/m(2)) and ejection fraction (LV: LoA -0.5 ± 1.6%, RV: LoA -2.1 ± 2.8%). CONCLUSION: Compared to standard cine MRI with breath hold, RT-MRI during free breathing with retrospective respiratory binning offers good image quality, reduced image artifacts enabling fast quantitative evaluations of ventricular volumes in clinical practice under physiological conditions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00247-022-05327-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9271116/ /pubmed/35353211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-022-05327-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Röwer, Lena Maria Radke, Karl Ludger Hußmann, Janina Malik, Halima Uelwer, Tobias Voit, Dirk Frahm, Jens Wittsack, Hans-Joerg Harmeling, Stefan Pillekamp, Frank Klee, Dirk Comparison of cardiac volumetry using real-time MRI during free-breathing with standard cine MRI during breath-hold in children |
title | Comparison of cardiac volumetry using real-time MRI during free-breathing with standard cine MRI during breath-hold in children |
title_full | Comparison of cardiac volumetry using real-time MRI during free-breathing with standard cine MRI during breath-hold in children |
title_fullStr | Comparison of cardiac volumetry using real-time MRI during free-breathing with standard cine MRI during breath-hold in children |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of cardiac volumetry using real-time MRI during free-breathing with standard cine MRI during breath-hold in children |
title_short | Comparison of cardiac volumetry using real-time MRI during free-breathing with standard cine MRI during breath-hold in children |
title_sort | comparison of cardiac volumetry using real-time mri during free-breathing with standard cine mri during breath-hold in children |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35353211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-022-05327-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rowerlenamaria comparisonofcardiacvolumetryusingrealtimemriduringfreebreathingwithstandardcinemriduringbreathholdinchildren AT radkekarlludger comparisonofcardiacvolumetryusingrealtimemriduringfreebreathingwithstandardcinemriduringbreathholdinchildren AT hußmannjanina comparisonofcardiacvolumetryusingrealtimemriduringfreebreathingwithstandardcinemriduringbreathholdinchildren AT malikhalima comparisonofcardiacvolumetryusingrealtimemriduringfreebreathingwithstandardcinemriduringbreathholdinchildren AT uelwertobias comparisonofcardiacvolumetryusingrealtimemriduringfreebreathingwithstandardcinemriduringbreathholdinchildren AT voitdirk comparisonofcardiacvolumetryusingrealtimemriduringfreebreathingwithstandardcinemriduringbreathholdinchildren AT frahmjens comparisonofcardiacvolumetryusingrealtimemriduringfreebreathingwithstandardcinemriduringbreathholdinchildren AT wittsackhansjoerg comparisonofcardiacvolumetryusingrealtimemriduringfreebreathingwithstandardcinemriduringbreathholdinchildren AT harmelingstefan comparisonofcardiacvolumetryusingrealtimemriduringfreebreathingwithstandardcinemriduringbreathholdinchildren AT pillekampfrank comparisonofcardiacvolumetryusingrealtimemriduringfreebreathingwithstandardcinemriduringbreathholdinchildren AT kleedirk comparisonofcardiacvolumetryusingrealtimemriduringfreebreathingwithstandardcinemriduringbreathholdinchildren |