Cargando…

Selective versus non-selective NSAIDs as prophylaxis for heterotopic ossification following hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Some patients have demonstrated evidence of heterotopic ossification (HO) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used as prophylaxis for HO following THA. This meta-analysis compared selective versus non-sele...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Migliorini, Filippo, Pintore, Andrea, Baroncini, Alice, Pastor, Torsten, Hildebrand, Frank, Maffulli, Nicola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35809109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00646-7
_version_ 1784744615198326784
author Migliorini, Filippo
Pintore, Andrea
Baroncini, Alice
Pastor, Torsten
Hildebrand, Frank
Maffulli, Nicola
author_facet Migliorini, Filippo
Pintore, Andrea
Baroncini, Alice
Pastor, Torsten
Hildebrand, Frank
Maffulli, Nicola
author_sort Migliorini, Filippo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Some patients have demonstrated evidence of heterotopic ossification (HO) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used as prophylaxis for HO following THA. This meta-analysis compared selective versus non-selective NSAIDs as prophylaxis for HO following THA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present study was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. All the clinical investigations comparing selective versus non-selective NSAIDs as prophylaxis for HO following THA were accessed in February 2022. An assessment of the methodological quality and statistical analyses were performed through the risk of bias summary tool of the Review Manager 5.3 software (Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen). The modified Brooker staging system was used to rate the efficacies of the interventions. RESULTS: Data from 8 studies and 1526 patients were collected. 60.8% were female. No difference was found in the sample size, mean age, and percentage of females between the two groups at baseline. No statistically significant difference was found between selective and non-selective NSAIDs in term of efficacy. 72% (1078 of 1502) of the patients were classified as Brooker 0, 21% (322 of 1502) as Brooker I, 5% (80 of 1502) as Brooker II, 1% (16 of 1502) as Brooker III, and 0.1% (2 of 1502) as Brooker IV. CONCLUSION: Selective and non-selective NSAIDs were equally effective when used as prophylaxis for HO following THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9271145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92711452022-07-11 Selective versus non-selective NSAIDs as prophylaxis for heterotopic ossification following hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis Migliorini, Filippo Pintore, Andrea Baroncini, Alice Pastor, Torsten Hildebrand, Frank Maffulli, Nicola J Orthop Traumatol Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Some patients have demonstrated evidence of heterotopic ossification (HO) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used as prophylaxis for HO following THA. This meta-analysis compared selective versus non-selective NSAIDs as prophylaxis for HO following THA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present study was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. All the clinical investigations comparing selective versus non-selective NSAIDs as prophylaxis for HO following THA were accessed in February 2022. An assessment of the methodological quality and statistical analyses were performed through the risk of bias summary tool of the Review Manager 5.3 software (Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen). The modified Brooker staging system was used to rate the efficacies of the interventions. RESULTS: Data from 8 studies and 1526 patients were collected. 60.8% were female. No difference was found in the sample size, mean age, and percentage of females between the two groups at baseline. No statistically significant difference was found between selective and non-selective NSAIDs in term of efficacy. 72% (1078 of 1502) of the patients were classified as Brooker 0, 21% (322 of 1502) as Brooker I, 5% (80 of 1502) as Brooker II, 1% (16 of 1502) as Brooker III, and 0.1% (2 of 1502) as Brooker IV. CONCLUSION: Selective and non-selective NSAIDs were equally effective when used as prophylaxis for HO following THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-09 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9271145/ /pubmed/35809109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00646-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Migliorini, Filippo
Pintore, Andrea
Baroncini, Alice
Pastor, Torsten
Hildebrand, Frank
Maffulli, Nicola
Selective versus non-selective NSAIDs as prophylaxis for heterotopic ossification following hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
title Selective versus non-selective NSAIDs as prophylaxis for heterotopic ossification following hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
title_full Selective versus non-selective NSAIDs as prophylaxis for heterotopic ossification following hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Selective versus non-selective NSAIDs as prophylaxis for heterotopic ossification following hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Selective versus non-selective NSAIDs as prophylaxis for heterotopic ossification following hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
title_short Selective versus non-selective NSAIDs as prophylaxis for heterotopic ossification following hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
title_sort selective versus non-selective nsaids as prophylaxis for heterotopic ossification following hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35809109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00646-7
work_keys_str_mv AT migliorinifilippo selectiveversusnonselectivensaidsasprophylaxisforheterotopicossificationfollowinghiparthroplastyametaanalysis
AT pintoreandrea selectiveversusnonselectivensaidsasprophylaxisforheterotopicossificationfollowinghiparthroplastyametaanalysis
AT baroncinialice selectiveversusnonselectivensaidsasprophylaxisforheterotopicossificationfollowinghiparthroplastyametaanalysis
AT pastortorsten selectiveversusnonselectivensaidsasprophylaxisforheterotopicossificationfollowinghiparthroplastyametaanalysis
AT hildebrandfrank selectiveversusnonselectivensaidsasprophylaxisforheterotopicossificationfollowinghiparthroplastyametaanalysis
AT maffullinicola selectiveversusnonselectivensaidsasprophylaxisforheterotopicossificationfollowinghiparthroplastyametaanalysis