Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of deep learning–based clinical target volume three-channel auto-segmentation algorithm for adaptive radiotherapy in cervical cancer

OBJECTIVES: Accurate contouring of the clinical target volume (CTV) is a key element of radiotherapy in cervical cancer. We validated a novel deep learning (DL)-based auto-segmentation algorithm for CTVs in cervical cancer called the three-channel adaptive auto-segmentation network (TCAS). METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Chen-ying, Zhou, Ju-ying, Xu, Xiao-ting, Qin, Song-bing, Han, Miao-fei, Cao, Xiao-huan, Gao, Yao-zong, Xu, Lu, Zhou, Jing-jie, Zhang, Wei, Jia, Le-cheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35810273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00851-0
_version_ 1784744638156898304
author Ma, Chen-ying
Zhou, Ju-ying
Xu, Xiao-ting
Qin, Song-bing
Han, Miao-fei
Cao, Xiao-huan
Gao, Yao-zong
Xu, Lu
Zhou, Jing-jie
Zhang, Wei
Jia, Le-cheng
author_facet Ma, Chen-ying
Zhou, Ju-ying
Xu, Xiao-ting
Qin, Song-bing
Han, Miao-fei
Cao, Xiao-huan
Gao, Yao-zong
Xu, Lu
Zhou, Jing-jie
Zhang, Wei
Jia, Le-cheng
author_sort Ma, Chen-ying
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Accurate contouring of the clinical target volume (CTV) is a key element of radiotherapy in cervical cancer. We validated a novel deep learning (DL)-based auto-segmentation algorithm for CTVs in cervical cancer called the three-channel adaptive auto-segmentation network (TCAS). METHODS: A total of 107 cases were collected and contoured by senior radiation oncologists (ROs). Each case consisted of the following: (1) contrast-enhanced CT scan for positioning, (2) the related CTV, (3) multiple plain CT scans during treatment and (4) the related CTV. After registration between (1) and (3) for the same patient, the aligned image and CTV were generated. Method 1 is rigid registration, method 2 is deformable registration, and the aligned CTV is seen as the result. Method 3 is rigid registration and TCAS, method 4 is deformable registration and TCAS, and the result is generated by a DL-based method. RESULTS: From the 107 cases, 15 pairs were selected as the test set. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of method 1 was 0.8155 ± 0.0368; the DSC of method 2 was 0.8277 ± 0.0315; the DSCs of method 3 and 4 were 0.8914 ± 0.0294 and 0.8921 ± 0.0231, respectively. The mean surface distance and Hausdorff distance of methods 3 and 4 were markedly better than those of method 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: The TCAS achieved comparable accuracy to the manual delineation performed by senior ROs and was significantly better than direct registration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9271246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92712462022-07-11 Clinical evaluation of deep learning–based clinical target volume three-channel auto-segmentation algorithm for adaptive radiotherapy in cervical cancer Ma, Chen-ying Zhou, Ju-ying Xu, Xiao-ting Qin, Song-bing Han, Miao-fei Cao, Xiao-huan Gao, Yao-zong Xu, Lu Zhou, Jing-jie Zhang, Wei Jia, Le-cheng BMC Med Imaging Research OBJECTIVES: Accurate contouring of the clinical target volume (CTV) is a key element of radiotherapy in cervical cancer. We validated a novel deep learning (DL)-based auto-segmentation algorithm for CTVs in cervical cancer called the three-channel adaptive auto-segmentation network (TCAS). METHODS: A total of 107 cases were collected and contoured by senior radiation oncologists (ROs). Each case consisted of the following: (1) contrast-enhanced CT scan for positioning, (2) the related CTV, (3) multiple plain CT scans during treatment and (4) the related CTV. After registration between (1) and (3) for the same patient, the aligned image and CTV were generated. Method 1 is rigid registration, method 2 is deformable registration, and the aligned CTV is seen as the result. Method 3 is rigid registration and TCAS, method 4 is deformable registration and TCAS, and the result is generated by a DL-based method. RESULTS: From the 107 cases, 15 pairs were selected as the test set. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of method 1 was 0.8155 ± 0.0368; the DSC of method 2 was 0.8277 ± 0.0315; the DSCs of method 3 and 4 were 0.8914 ± 0.0294 and 0.8921 ± 0.0231, respectively. The mean surface distance and Hausdorff distance of methods 3 and 4 were markedly better than those of method 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: The TCAS achieved comparable accuracy to the manual delineation performed by senior ROs and was significantly better than direct registration. BioMed Central 2022-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9271246/ /pubmed/35810273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00851-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ma, Chen-ying
Zhou, Ju-ying
Xu, Xiao-ting
Qin, Song-bing
Han, Miao-fei
Cao, Xiao-huan
Gao, Yao-zong
Xu, Lu
Zhou, Jing-jie
Zhang, Wei
Jia, Le-cheng
Clinical evaluation of deep learning–based clinical target volume three-channel auto-segmentation algorithm for adaptive radiotherapy in cervical cancer
title Clinical evaluation of deep learning–based clinical target volume three-channel auto-segmentation algorithm for adaptive radiotherapy in cervical cancer
title_full Clinical evaluation of deep learning–based clinical target volume three-channel auto-segmentation algorithm for adaptive radiotherapy in cervical cancer
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of deep learning–based clinical target volume three-channel auto-segmentation algorithm for adaptive radiotherapy in cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of deep learning–based clinical target volume three-channel auto-segmentation algorithm for adaptive radiotherapy in cervical cancer
title_short Clinical evaluation of deep learning–based clinical target volume three-channel auto-segmentation algorithm for adaptive radiotherapy in cervical cancer
title_sort clinical evaluation of deep learning–based clinical target volume three-channel auto-segmentation algorithm for adaptive radiotherapy in cervical cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35810273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00851-0
work_keys_str_mv AT machenying clinicalevaluationofdeeplearningbasedclinicaltargetvolumethreechannelautosegmentationalgorithmforadaptiveradiotherapyincervicalcancer
AT zhoujuying clinicalevaluationofdeeplearningbasedclinicaltargetvolumethreechannelautosegmentationalgorithmforadaptiveradiotherapyincervicalcancer
AT xuxiaoting clinicalevaluationofdeeplearningbasedclinicaltargetvolumethreechannelautosegmentationalgorithmforadaptiveradiotherapyincervicalcancer
AT qinsongbing clinicalevaluationofdeeplearningbasedclinicaltargetvolumethreechannelautosegmentationalgorithmforadaptiveradiotherapyincervicalcancer
AT hanmiaofei clinicalevaluationofdeeplearningbasedclinicaltargetvolumethreechannelautosegmentationalgorithmforadaptiveradiotherapyincervicalcancer
AT caoxiaohuan clinicalevaluationofdeeplearningbasedclinicaltargetvolumethreechannelautosegmentationalgorithmforadaptiveradiotherapyincervicalcancer
AT gaoyaozong clinicalevaluationofdeeplearningbasedclinicaltargetvolumethreechannelautosegmentationalgorithmforadaptiveradiotherapyincervicalcancer
AT xulu clinicalevaluationofdeeplearningbasedclinicaltargetvolumethreechannelautosegmentationalgorithmforadaptiveradiotherapyincervicalcancer
AT zhoujingjie clinicalevaluationofdeeplearningbasedclinicaltargetvolumethreechannelautosegmentationalgorithmforadaptiveradiotherapyincervicalcancer
AT zhangwei clinicalevaluationofdeeplearningbasedclinicaltargetvolumethreechannelautosegmentationalgorithmforadaptiveradiotherapyincervicalcancer
AT jialecheng clinicalevaluationofdeeplearningbasedclinicaltargetvolumethreechannelautosegmentationalgorithmforadaptiveradiotherapyincervicalcancer