Cargando…
Preference Testing in Medical Devices: Current Framework and Regulatory Gaps
Preference testing is a valuable source of information that can be provided by both healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients (users). It can be used to improve the design and development of medical devices by feeding into device usability and, ultimately, risk management. Furthermore, it can aid...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35822064 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S368420 |
_version_ | 1784744647005831168 |
---|---|
author | Lewis, Amy Douka, Despoina Koukoura, Angeliki Valla, Vasiliki Smirthwaite, Amie Faarbaek, Susanne Holm Vassiliadis, Efstathios |
author_facet | Lewis, Amy Douka, Despoina Koukoura, Angeliki Valla, Vasiliki Smirthwaite, Amie Faarbaek, Susanne Holm Vassiliadis, Efstathios |
author_sort | Lewis, Amy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Preference testing is a valuable source of information that can be provided by both healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients (users). It can be used to improve the design and development of medical devices by feeding into device usability and, ultimately, risk management. Furthermore, it can aid with selecting the most appropriate clinical endpoints to be used in the clinical evaluation of a device and increase patient engagement by incorporating patient-relevant outcomes. Preference testing is widely conducted in the food industry but is not widespread in the medical field due to limited guidelines and a lack of regulatory framework. As such, manufacturers may be unaware of the benefits of preference testing and fail to take full advantage of it, or conversely, may use inappropriate methodology and/or analyses and consequently fail to collect meaningful data. In this position paper, we aim to highlight the benefits and uses of preference testing, along with potential methods that could be used for preference testing of medical devices. A key step towards the wider implementation of preference testing in medical devices is for the publication of international standards and guidelines for the collection, assessment, and implementation of preference data into the life cycle of a medical device. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9271283 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92712832022-07-11 Preference Testing in Medical Devices: Current Framework and Regulatory Gaps Lewis, Amy Douka, Despoina Koukoura, Angeliki Valla, Vasiliki Smirthwaite, Amie Faarbaek, Susanne Holm Vassiliadis, Efstathios Med Devices (Auckl) Perspectives Preference testing is a valuable source of information that can be provided by both healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients (users). It can be used to improve the design and development of medical devices by feeding into device usability and, ultimately, risk management. Furthermore, it can aid with selecting the most appropriate clinical endpoints to be used in the clinical evaluation of a device and increase patient engagement by incorporating patient-relevant outcomes. Preference testing is widely conducted in the food industry but is not widespread in the medical field due to limited guidelines and a lack of regulatory framework. As such, manufacturers may be unaware of the benefits of preference testing and fail to take full advantage of it, or conversely, may use inappropriate methodology and/or analyses and consequently fail to collect meaningful data. In this position paper, we aim to highlight the benefits and uses of preference testing, along with potential methods that could be used for preference testing of medical devices. A key step towards the wider implementation of preference testing in medical devices is for the publication of international standards and guidelines for the collection, assessment, and implementation of preference data into the life cycle of a medical device. Dove 2022-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9271283/ /pubmed/35822064 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S368420 Text en © 2022 Lewis et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Perspectives Lewis, Amy Douka, Despoina Koukoura, Angeliki Valla, Vasiliki Smirthwaite, Amie Faarbaek, Susanne Holm Vassiliadis, Efstathios Preference Testing in Medical Devices: Current Framework and Regulatory Gaps |
title | Preference Testing in Medical Devices: Current Framework and Regulatory Gaps |
title_full | Preference Testing in Medical Devices: Current Framework and Regulatory Gaps |
title_fullStr | Preference Testing in Medical Devices: Current Framework and Regulatory Gaps |
title_full_unstemmed | Preference Testing in Medical Devices: Current Framework and Regulatory Gaps |
title_short | Preference Testing in Medical Devices: Current Framework and Regulatory Gaps |
title_sort | preference testing in medical devices: current framework and regulatory gaps |
topic | Perspectives |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35822064 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S368420 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lewisamy preferencetestinginmedicaldevicescurrentframeworkandregulatorygaps AT doukadespoina preferencetestinginmedicaldevicescurrentframeworkandregulatorygaps AT koukouraangeliki preferencetestinginmedicaldevicescurrentframeworkandregulatorygaps AT vallavasiliki preferencetestinginmedicaldevicescurrentframeworkandregulatorygaps AT smirthwaiteamie preferencetestinginmedicaldevicescurrentframeworkandregulatorygaps AT faarbaeksusanneholm preferencetestinginmedicaldevicescurrentframeworkandregulatorygaps AT vassiliadisefstathios preferencetestinginmedicaldevicescurrentframeworkandregulatorygaps |