Cargando…
Démarche décisionnelle et évaluation des interventions de santé publique
OBJECTIVE: We have designed a methodological framework for experts involved in the support of decision-making in public health interventions. METHODS: The methodological framework consists of four elements: 1) A series of nine questions, formulated in non-technical terms, relevant to assessment of t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Masson SAS.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35831220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respe.2022.06.307 |
_version_ | 1784744656978837504 |
---|---|
author | Salmi, L.-R. Noël, L. Saillour-Glénisson, F. |
author_facet | Salmi, L.-R. Noël, L. Saillour-Glénisson, F. |
author_sort | Salmi, L.-R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We have designed a methodological framework for experts involved in the support of decision-making in public health interventions. METHODS: The methodological framework consists of four elements: 1) A series of nine questions, formulated in non-technical terms, relevant to assessment of the usefulness of an intervention, at a given time in a given context; 2) Translation of these questions into concepts related to the evaluation of interventions (definition of the intervention, its target and objective, potential and actual effectiveness, safety, efficiency, and equity); 3) Logical organization of the information needed to address and answer the questions; and 4) An algorithm to translate the available information into recommendations on the real usefulness of the intervention in the context in which the questions were raised. RESULTS: Each step is illustrated by questions raised about road safety interventions, screening, blood transfusion and measures proposed during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: Decision-making can be facilitated if experts provide decision-makers with a formal summary of the strengths and weaknesses of existing knowledge, based on an analysis of all facets of an intervention's potential usefulness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9271323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier Masson SAS. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92713232022-07-11 Démarche décisionnelle et évaluation des interventions de santé publique Salmi, L.-R. Noël, L. Saillour-Glénisson, F. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique Note Pédagogique OBJECTIVE: We have designed a methodological framework for experts involved in the support of decision-making in public health interventions. METHODS: The methodological framework consists of four elements: 1) A series of nine questions, formulated in non-technical terms, relevant to assessment of the usefulness of an intervention, at a given time in a given context; 2) Translation of these questions into concepts related to the evaluation of interventions (definition of the intervention, its target and objective, potential and actual effectiveness, safety, efficiency, and equity); 3) Logical organization of the information needed to address and answer the questions; and 4) An algorithm to translate the available information into recommendations on the real usefulness of the intervention in the context in which the questions were raised. RESULTS: Each step is illustrated by questions raised about road safety interventions, screening, blood transfusion and measures proposed during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: Decision-making can be facilitated if experts provide decision-makers with a formal summary of the strengths and weaknesses of existing knowledge, based on an analysis of all facets of an intervention's potential usefulness. Elsevier Masson SAS. 2023-04 2022-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9271323/ /pubmed/35831220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respe.2022.06.307 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Note Pédagogique Salmi, L.-R. Noël, L. Saillour-Glénisson, F. Démarche décisionnelle et évaluation des interventions de santé publique |
title | Démarche décisionnelle et évaluation des interventions de santé publique |
title_full | Démarche décisionnelle et évaluation des interventions de santé publique |
title_fullStr | Démarche décisionnelle et évaluation des interventions de santé publique |
title_full_unstemmed | Démarche décisionnelle et évaluation des interventions de santé publique |
title_short | Démarche décisionnelle et évaluation des interventions de santé publique |
title_sort | démarche décisionnelle et évaluation des interventions de santé publique |
topic | Note Pédagogique |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35831220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respe.2022.06.307 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salmilr demarchedecisionnelleetevaluationdesinterventionsdesantepublique AT noell demarchedecisionnelleetevaluationdesinterventionsdesantepublique AT saillourglenissonf demarchedecisionnelleetevaluationdesinterventionsdesantepublique |