Cargando…

The evaluation of changes in maxillofacial bones using cone beam tomography in acromegaly

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the changes in craniofacial dimensions of newly diagnosed and untreated acromegaly patients, patients with non-functional pituitary adenoma and healthy individuals on Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 50 newly diagnosed acrom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dogruel, Fatma, Canger, Emin Murat, Gonen, Zeynep Burcin, Asantogrol, Firdevs, Şahin, Ali, Bayram, Fahri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35717618
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.25280
_version_ 1784744658922897408
author Dogruel, Fatma
Canger, Emin Murat
Gonen, Zeynep Burcin
Asantogrol, Firdevs
Şahin, Ali
Bayram, Fahri
author_facet Dogruel, Fatma
Canger, Emin Murat
Gonen, Zeynep Burcin
Asantogrol, Firdevs
Şahin, Ali
Bayram, Fahri
author_sort Dogruel, Fatma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the changes in craniofacial dimensions of newly diagnosed and untreated acromegaly patients, patients with non-functional pituitary adenoma and healthy individuals on Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 50 newly diagnosed acromegaly patients who did not receive any treatment for acromegaly were included in the study (Group A). Twenty patients with nonfunctional pituitary adenoma (Group B) and 30 healthy individuals were included (Group C). Linear, angular and volumetric measurements were performed. RESULTS: Mandibular length showed significant difference in acromegaly patients, and maxillar length statistically significant difference was found between the A-B and B-C (p> 0,05), no difference was found between the A-C (p<0,05). SNB and ANB angle was statistically different in all groups, while SNA angle was statistically different between group A-C and B-C. In volumetric measurements, a statistically significant difference was found between groups a-c and groups A-B (p< 0,05), no difference was found between groups B-C (p>0,05). CONCLUSIONS: CBCT measurements showed that mandibular volume and length were increased in the acromegaly group compared to the group B-C. Present study is the first research that compares acromegaly patients in respect to changes in maxillofacial dimensions. Key words:Acromegaly, pituitary adenoma, maxillofacial bones, cone beam computed tomography.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9271343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92713432022-07-11 The evaluation of changes in maxillofacial bones using cone beam tomography in acromegaly Dogruel, Fatma Canger, Emin Murat Gonen, Zeynep Burcin Asantogrol, Firdevs Şahin, Ali Bayram, Fahri Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the changes in craniofacial dimensions of newly diagnosed and untreated acromegaly patients, patients with non-functional pituitary adenoma and healthy individuals on Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 50 newly diagnosed acromegaly patients who did not receive any treatment for acromegaly were included in the study (Group A). Twenty patients with nonfunctional pituitary adenoma (Group B) and 30 healthy individuals were included (Group C). Linear, angular and volumetric measurements were performed. RESULTS: Mandibular length showed significant difference in acromegaly patients, and maxillar length statistically significant difference was found between the A-B and B-C (p> 0,05), no difference was found between the A-C (p<0,05). SNB and ANB angle was statistically different in all groups, while SNA angle was statistically different between group A-C and B-C. In volumetric measurements, a statistically significant difference was found between groups a-c and groups A-B (p< 0,05), no difference was found between groups B-C (p>0,05). CONCLUSIONS: CBCT measurements showed that mandibular volume and length were increased in the acromegaly group compared to the group B-C. Present study is the first research that compares acromegaly patients in respect to changes in maxillofacial dimensions. Key words:Acromegaly, pituitary adenoma, maxillofacial bones, cone beam computed tomography. Medicina Oral S.L. 2022-07 2022-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9271343/ /pubmed/35717618 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.25280 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Medicina Oral S.L. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Dogruel, Fatma
Canger, Emin Murat
Gonen, Zeynep Burcin
Asantogrol, Firdevs
Şahin, Ali
Bayram, Fahri
The evaluation of changes in maxillofacial bones using cone beam tomography in acromegaly
title The evaluation of changes in maxillofacial bones using cone beam tomography in acromegaly
title_full The evaluation of changes in maxillofacial bones using cone beam tomography in acromegaly
title_fullStr The evaluation of changes in maxillofacial bones using cone beam tomography in acromegaly
title_full_unstemmed The evaluation of changes in maxillofacial bones using cone beam tomography in acromegaly
title_short The evaluation of changes in maxillofacial bones using cone beam tomography in acromegaly
title_sort evaluation of changes in maxillofacial bones using cone beam tomography in acromegaly
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35717618
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.25280
work_keys_str_mv AT dogruelfatma theevaluationofchangesinmaxillofacialbonesusingconebeamtomographyinacromegaly
AT cangereminmurat theevaluationofchangesinmaxillofacialbonesusingconebeamtomographyinacromegaly
AT gonenzeynepburcin theevaluationofchangesinmaxillofacialbonesusingconebeamtomographyinacromegaly
AT asantogrolfirdevs theevaluationofchangesinmaxillofacialbonesusingconebeamtomographyinacromegaly
AT sahinali theevaluationofchangesinmaxillofacialbonesusingconebeamtomographyinacromegaly
AT bayramfahri theevaluationofchangesinmaxillofacialbonesusingconebeamtomographyinacromegaly
AT dogruelfatma evaluationofchangesinmaxillofacialbonesusingconebeamtomographyinacromegaly
AT cangereminmurat evaluationofchangesinmaxillofacialbonesusingconebeamtomographyinacromegaly
AT gonenzeynepburcin evaluationofchangesinmaxillofacialbonesusingconebeamtomographyinacromegaly
AT asantogrolfirdevs evaluationofchangesinmaxillofacialbonesusingconebeamtomographyinacromegaly
AT sahinali evaluationofchangesinmaxillofacialbonesusingconebeamtomographyinacromegaly
AT bayramfahri evaluationofchangesinmaxillofacialbonesusingconebeamtomographyinacromegaly