Cargando…

Sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry

BACKGROUND: Recommendations for research articles include the use of the term sex when reporting biological factors and gender for identities or psychosocial or cultural factors. There is an increasing awareness of incorporating the effect of sex and gender on cancer outcomes. Thus, these types of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plazas, J. Gallego, Arias-Martinez, A., Lecumberri, A., Martínez de Castro, E., Custodio, A., Cano, J.M., Hernandez, R., Montes, A.F., Macias, I., Pieras-Lopez, A., Diez, M., Visa, L., Tocino, R.V., Lago, N. Martínez, Limón, M.L., Gil, M., Pimentel, P., Mangas, M., Granja, M., Carnicero, A.M., Pérez, C. Hernández, Gonzalez, L.G., Jimenez-Fonseca, P., Carmona-Bayonas, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35714478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100514
_version_ 1784744693395881984
author Plazas, J. Gallego
Arias-Martinez, A.
Lecumberri, A.
Martínez de Castro, E.
Custodio, A.
Cano, J.M.
Hernandez, R.
Montes, A.F.
Macias, I.
Pieras-Lopez, A.
Diez, M.
Visa, L.
Tocino, R.V.
Lago, N. Martínez
Limón, M.L.
Gil, M.
Pimentel, P.
Mangas, M.
Granja, M.
Carnicero, A.M.
Pérez, C. Hernández
Gonzalez, L.G.
Jimenez-Fonseca, P.
Carmona-Bayonas, A.
author_facet Plazas, J. Gallego
Arias-Martinez, A.
Lecumberri, A.
Martínez de Castro, E.
Custodio, A.
Cano, J.M.
Hernandez, R.
Montes, A.F.
Macias, I.
Pieras-Lopez, A.
Diez, M.
Visa, L.
Tocino, R.V.
Lago, N. Martínez
Limón, M.L.
Gil, M.
Pimentel, P.
Mangas, M.
Granja, M.
Carnicero, A.M.
Pérez, C. Hernández
Gonzalez, L.G.
Jimenez-Fonseca, P.
Carmona-Bayonas, A.
author_sort Plazas, J. Gallego
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recommendations for research articles include the use of the term sex when reporting biological factors and gender for identities or psychosocial or cultural factors. There is an increasing awareness of incorporating the effect of sex and gender on cancer outcomes. Thus, these types of analyses for advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma are relevant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma from the Spanish AGAMENON-SEOM registry treated with first-line combination chemotherapy were selected. Epidemiology, characteristics of the disease, treatment selection, and results were examined according to sex. RESULTS: This analysis included 3274 advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients treated with combination chemotherapy between 2008 and 2021: 2313 (70.7%) men and 961 (29.3%) women. Tumors in females were more frequently HER2-negative (67.8% versus 60.8%; P < 0.0001), grade 3 (45.4% versus 36.8%; P < 0.001), diffuse (43.3% versus 26.5%; P < 0.0001), and signet ring cell histology (40.5 versus 23.9%; P < 0.0001). Peritoneal spread was more common in women (58.6% versus 38.9%; P < 0.0001), while liver burden was lower (58.9% versus 71.1%; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in treatment recommendation. Treatment doses, density, and duration were comparable between sexes. Women experienced more diarrhea (46% versus 37%; P < 0.0001), neutropenia (51% versus 43%; P < 0.0001), and anemia (62% versus 57%; P < 0.0001). After a median 59.6-month follow-up [95% confidence interval (CI) 54.5-70.8], there were no statistically significant differences between the sexes in progression-free survival [6.21 months (95% CI 5.8-6.5 months) versus 6.08 months (95% CI 5.8-6.3 months); log-rank test, χ(2) = 0.1, 1 df, P = 0.8] or in overall survival [10.6 months (95% CI 9.8-11.1 months) versus 10.9 months (95% CI 10.4-11.4 months); log-rank test: χ(2) = 0.6, 1 df, P = 0.5]. CONCLUSION: This sex analysis of patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry receiving first-line polychemotherapy found no differences in survival. Although women had worse prognostic histopathology, metastatic disease pattern, and greater toxicity, treatment allocation and compliance were equivalent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9271495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92714952022-07-12 Sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry Plazas, J. Gallego Arias-Martinez, A. Lecumberri, A. Martínez de Castro, E. Custodio, A. Cano, J.M. Hernandez, R. Montes, A.F. Macias, I. Pieras-Lopez, A. Diez, M. Visa, L. Tocino, R.V. Lago, N. Martínez Limón, M.L. Gil, M. Pimentel, P. Mangas, M. Granja, M. Carnicero, A.M. Pérez, C. Hernández Gonzalez, L.G. Jimenez-Fonseca, P. Carmona-Bayonas, A. ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: Recommendations for research articles include the use of the term sex when reporting biological factors and gender for identities or psychosocial or cultural factors. There is an increasing awareness of incorporating the effect of sex and gender on cancer outcomes. Thus, these types of analyses for advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma are relevant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma from the Spanish AGAMENON-SEOM registry treated with first-line combination chemotherapy were selected. Epidemiology, characteristics of the disease, treatment selection, and results were examined according to sex. RESULTS: This analysis included 3274 advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients treated with combination chemotherapy between 2008 and 2021: 2313 (70.7%) men and 961 (29.3%) women. Tumors in females were more frequently HER2-negative (67.8% versus 60.8%; P < 0.0001), grade 3 (45.4% versus 36.8%; P < 0.001), diffuse (43.3% versus 26.5%; P < 0.0001), and signet ring cell histology (40.5 versus 23.9%; P < 0.0001). Peritoneal spread was more common in women (58.6% versus 38.9%; P < 0.0001), while liver burden was lower (58.9% versus 71.1%; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in treatment recommendation. Treatment doses, density, and duration were comparable between sexes. Women experienced more diarrhea (46% versus 37%; P < 0.0001), neutropenia (51% versus 43%; P < 0.0001), and anemia (62% versus 57%; P < 0.0001). After a median 59.6-month follow-up [95% confidence interval (CI) 54.5-70.8], there were no statistically significant differences between the sexes in progression-free survival [6.21 months (95% CI 5.8-6.5 months) versus 6.08 months (95% CI 5.8-6.3 months); log-rank test, χ(2) = 0.1, 1 df, P = 0.8] or in overall survival [10.6 months (95% CI 9.8-11.1 months) versus 10.9 months (95% CI 10.4-11.4 months); log-rank test: χ(2) = 0.6, 1 df, P = 0.5]. CONCLUSION: This sex analysis of patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry receiving first-line polychemotherapy found no differences in survival. Although women had worse prognostic histopathology, metastatic disease pattern, and greater toxicity, treatment allocation and compliance were equivalent. Elsevier 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9271495/ /pubmed/35714478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100514 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Plazas, J. Gallego
Arias-Martinez, A.
Lecumberri, A.
Martínez de Castro, E.
Custodio, A.
Cano, J.M.
Hernandez, R.
Montes, A.F.
Macias, I.
Pieras-Lopez, A.
Diez, M.
Visa, L.
Tocino, R.V.
Lago, N. Martínez
Limón, M.L.
Gil, M.
Pimentel, P.
Mangas, M.
Granja, M.
Carnicero, A.M.
Pérez, C. Hernández
Gonzalez, L.G.
Jimenez-Fonseca, P.
Carmona-Bayonas, A.
Sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry
title Sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry
title_full Sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry
title_fullStr Sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry
title_full_unstemmed Sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry
title_short Sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry
title_sort sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the agamenon-seom registry
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35714478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100514
work_keys_str_mv AT plazasjgallego sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT ariasmartineza sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT lecumberria sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT martinezdecastroe sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT custodioa sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT canojm sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT hernandezr sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT montesaf sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT maciasi sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT pieraslopeza sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT diezm sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT visal sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT tocinorv sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT lagonmartinez sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT limonml sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT gilm sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT pimentelp sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT mangasm sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT granjam sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT carniceroam sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT perezchernandez sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT gonzalezlg sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT jimenezfonsecap sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry
AT carmonabayonasa sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry