Cargando…
Sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry
BACKGROUND: Recommendations for research articles include the use of the term sex when reporting biological factors and gender for identities or psychosocial or cultural factors. There is an increasing awareness of incorporating the effect of sex and gender on cancer outcomes. Thus, these types of a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35714478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100514 |
_version_ | 1784744693395881984 |
---|---|
author | Plazas, J. Gallego Arias-Martinez, A. Lecumberri, A. Martínez de Castro, E. Custodio, A. Cano, J.M. Hernandez, R. Montes, A.F. Macias, I. Pieras-Lopez, A. Diez, M. Visa, L. Tocino, R.V. Lago, N. Martínez Limón, M.L. Gil, M. Pimentel, P. Mangas, M. Granja, M. Carnicero, A.M. Pérez, C. Hernández Gonzalez, L.G. Jimenez-Fonseca, P. Carmona-Bayonas, A. |
author_facet | Plazas, J. Gallego Arias-Martinez, A. Lecumberri, A. Martínez de Castro, E. Custodio, A. Cano, J.M. Hernandez, R. Montes, A.F. Macias, I. Pieras-Lopez, A. Diez, M. Visa, L. Tocino, R.V. Lago, N. Martínez Limón, M.L. Gil, M. Pimentel, P. Mangas, M. Granja, M. Carnicero, A.M. Pérez, C. Hernández Gonzalez, L.G. Jimenez-Fonseca, P. Carmona-Bayonas, A. |
author_sort | Plazas, J. Gallego |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recommendations for research articles include the use of the term sex when reporting biological factors and gender for identities or psychosocial or cultural factors. There is an increasing awareness of incorporating the effect of sex and gender on cancer outcomes. Thus, these types of analyses for advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma are relevant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma from the Spanish AGAMENON-SEOM registry treated with first-line combination chemotherapy were selected. Epidemiology, characteristics of the disease, treatment selection, and results were examined according to sex. RESULTS: This analysis included 3274 advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients treated with combination chemotherapy between 2008 and 2021: 2313 (70.7%) men and 961 (29.3%) women. Tumors in females were more frequently HER2-negative (67.8% versus 60.8%; P < 0.0001), grade 3 (45.4% versus 36.8%; P < 0.001), diffuse (43.3% versus 26.5%; P < 0.0001), and signet ring cell histology (40.5 versus 23.9%; P < 0.0001). Peritoneal spread was more common in women (58.6% versus 38.9%; P < 0.0001), while liver burden was lower (58.9% versus 71.1%; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in treatment recommendation. Treatment doses, density, and duration were comparable between sexes. Women experienced more diarrhea (46% versus 37%; P < 0.0001), neutropenia (51% versus 43%; P < 0.0001), and anemia (62% versus 57%; P < 0.0001). After a median 59.6-month follow-up [95% confidence interval (CI) 54.5-70.8], there were no statistically significant differences between the sexes in progression-free survival [6.21 months (95% CI 5.8-6.5 months) versus 6.08 months (95% CI 5.8-6.3 months); log-rank test, χ(2) = 0.1, 1 df, P = 0.8] or in overall survival [10.6 months (95% CI 9.8-11.1 months) versus 10.9 months (95% CI 10.4-11.4 months); log-rank test: χ(2) = 0.6, 1 df, P = 0.5]. CONCLUSION: This sex analysis of patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry receiving first-line polychemotherapy found no differences in survival. Although women had worse prognostic histopathology, metastatic disease pattern, and greater toxicity, treatment allocation and compliance were equivalent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9271495 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92714952022-07-12 Sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry Plazas, J. Gallego Arias-Martinez, A. Lecumberri, A. Martínez de Castro, E. Custodio, A. Cano, J.M. Hernandez, R. Montes, A.F. Macias, I. Pieras-Lopez, A. Diez, M. Visa, L. Tocino, R.V. Lago, N. Martínez Limón, M.L. Gil, M. Pimentel, P. Mangas, M. Granja, M. Carnicero, A.M. Pérez, C. Hernández Gonzalez, L.G. Jimenez-Fonseca, P. Carmona-Bayonas, A. ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: Recommendations for research articles include the use of the term sex when reporting biological factors and gender for identities or psychosocial or cultural factors. There is an increasing awareness of incorporating the effect of sex and gender on cancer outcomes. Thus, these types of analyses for advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma are relevant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma from the Spanish AGAMENON-SEOM registry treated with first-line combination chemotherapy were selected. Epidemiology, characteristics of the disease, treatment selection, and results were examined according to sex. RESULTS: This analysis included 3274 advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients treated with combination chemotherapy between 2008 and 2021: 2313 (70.7%) men and 961 (29.3%) women. Tumors in females were more frequently HER2-negative (67.8% versus 60.8%; P < 0.0001), grade 3 (45.4% versus 36.8%; P < 0.001), diffuse (43.3% versus 26.5%; P < 0.0001), and signet ring cell histology (40.5 versus 23.9%; P < 0.0001). Peritoneal spread was more common in women (58.6% versus 38.9%; P < 0.0001), while liver burden was lower (58.9% versus 71.1%; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in treatment recommendation. Treatment doses, density, and duration were comparable between sexes. Women experienced more diarrhea (46% versus 37%; P < 0.0001), neutropenia (51% versus 43%; P < 0.0001), and anemia (62% versus 57%; P < 0.0001). After a median 59.6-month follow-up [95% confidence interval (CI) 54.5-70.8], there were no statistically significant differences between the sexes in progression-free survival [6.21 months (95% CI 5.8-6.5 months) versus 6.08 months (95% CI 5.8-6.3 months); log-rank test, χ(2) = 0.1, 1 df, P = 0.8] or in overall survival [10.6 months (95% CI 9.8-11.1 months) versus 10.9 months (95% CI 10.4-11.4 months); log-rank test: χ(2) = 0.6, 1 df, P = 0.5]. CONCLUSION: This sex analysis of patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry receiving first-line polychemotherapy found no differences in survival. Although women had worse prognostic histopathology, metastatic disease pattern, and greater toxicity, treatment allocation and compliance were equivalent. Elsevier 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9271495/ /pubmed/35714478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100514 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Plazas, J. Gallego Arias-Martinez, A. Lecumberri, A. Martínez de Castro, E. Custodio, A. Cano, J.M. Hernandez, R. Montes, A.F. Macias, I. Pieras-Lopez, A. Diez, M. Visa, L. Tocino, R.V. Lago, N. Martínez Limón, M.L. Gil, M. Pimentel, P. Mangas, M. Granja, M. Carnicero, A.M. Pérez, C. Hernández Gonzalez, L.G. Jimenez-Fonseca, P. Carmona-Bayonas, A. Sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry |
title | Sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry |
title_full | Sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry |
title_fullStr | Sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry |
title_short | Sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry |
title_sort | sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the agamenon-seom registry |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35714478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100514 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT plazasjgallego sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT ariasmartineza sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT lecumberria sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT martinezdecastroe sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT custodioa sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT canojm sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT hernandezr sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT montesaf sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT maciasi sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT pieraslopeza sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT diezm sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT visal sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT tocinorv sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT lagonmartinez sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT limonml sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT gilm sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT pimentelp sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT mangasm sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT granjam sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT carniceroam sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT perezchernandez sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT gonzalezlg sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT jimenezfonsecap sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry AT carmonabayonasa sexandgenderdisparitiesinpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealadenocarcinomadatafromtheagamenonseomregistry |