Cargando…

Improvement Effect of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis MH-02 in Patients Receiving Resection of Colorectal Polyps: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Postoperative symptoms, bowel dysfunction and recurrence are common problems after resection of colorectal polyps. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Bifidobacterium in the postoperative patients. METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Hui, Zhang, Kaige, Liu, Peng, Xu, Xuan, Zhou, Yuyang, Gan, Lihong, Yao, Ling, Li, Bin, Chen, Tingtao, Fang, Nian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35833120
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.940500
_version_ 1784744699868741632
author Liu, Hui
Zhang, Kaige
Liu, Peng
Xu, Xuan
Zhou, Yuyang
Gan, Lihong
Yao, Ling
Li, Bin
Chen, Tingtao
Fang, Nian
author_facet Liu, Hui
Zhang, Kaige
Liu, Peng
Xu, Xuan
Zhou, Yuyang
Gan, Lihong
Yao, Ling
Li, Bin
Chen, Tingtao
Fang, Nian
author_sort Liu, Hui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postoperative symptoms, bowel dysfunction and recurrence are common problems after resection of colorectal polyps. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Bifidobacterium in the postoperative patients. METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults (≥ 18 years) undergoing endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps were treated with probiotics (Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis MH-02, 2 × 10(9) colony-forming units per packet) or placebo once daily for 7 days. The primary clinical endpoint was a reduction in the mean total postoperative symptoms score within 7 days postoperatively. Secondary clinical endpoints were the single symptom scores, time to recovery of bowel function, and changes in the intestinal microbiota. This study is registered with the number ChiCTR2100046687. RESULTS: A total of 100 individuals were included (48 in probiotic group and 52 in placebo group). No difference was seen in the mean scores between the two groups (0.29 vs. 0.43, P = 0.246). Colorectal polyps size (P = 0.008) and preoperative symptoms (P = 0.032) were influential factors for the primary endpoint. Besides, MH-02 alleviated difficult defecation (P = 0.045), and reduced the time to recovery of bowel function (P = 0.032). High-throughput analysis showed that MH-02 can help restore the diversity of intestinal microbiota, and increased the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium, Roseburia, Gemmiger, Blautia and Ruminococcus, while reduced the relative abundance of Clostridium at genus level (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this prospective trial, MH-02 showed efficacy in patients with resection of colorectal polyps, particularly in the recovery of bowel function, and the changes in the intestinal microbiota may provide evidence for further exploration of the therapeutic mechanisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9271559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92715592022-07-12 Improvement Effect of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis MH-02 in Patients Receiving Resection of Colorectal Polyps: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Liu, Hui Zhang, Kaige Liu, Peng Xu, Xuan Zhou, Yuyang Gan, Lihong Yao, Ling Li, Bin Chen, Tingtao Fang, Nian Front Immunol Immunology BACKGROUND: Postoperative symptoms, bowel dysfunction and recurrence are common problems after resection of colorectal polyps. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Bifidobacterium in the postoperative patients. METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults (≥ 18 years) undergoing endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps were treated with probiotics (Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis MH-02, 2 × 10(9) colony-forming units per packet) or placebo once daily for 7 days. The primary clinical endpoint was a reduction in the mean total postoperative symptoms score within 7 days postoperatively. Secondary clinical endpoints were the single symptom scores, time to recovery of bowel function, and changes in the intestinal microbiota. This study is registered with the number ChiCTR2100046687. RESULTS: A total of 100 individuals were included (48 in probiotic group and 52 in placebo group). No difference was seen in the mean scores between the two groups (0.29 vs. 0.43, P = 0.246). Colorectal polyps size (P = 0.008) and preoperative symptoms (P = 0.032) were influential factors for the primary endpoint. Besides, MH-02 alleviated difficult defecation (P = 0.045), and reduced the time to recovery of bowel function (P = 0.032). High-throughput analysis showed that MH-02 can help restore the diversity of intestinal microbiota, and increased the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium, Roseburia, Gemmiger, Blautia and Ruminococcus, while reduced the relative abundance of Clostridium at genus level (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this prospective trial, MH-02 showed efficacy in patients with resection of colorectal polyps, particularly in the recovery of bowel function, and the changes in the intestinal microbiota may provide evidence for further exploration of the therapeutic mechanisms. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9271559/ /pubmed/35833120 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.940500 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liu, Zhang, Liu, Xu, Zhou, Gan, Yao, Li, Chen and Fang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Liu, Hui
Zhang, Kaige
Liu, Peng
Xu, Xuan
Zhou, Yuyang
Gan, Lihong
Yao, Ling
Li, Bin
Chen, Tingtao
Fang, Nian
Improvement Effect of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis MH-02 in Patients Receiving Resection of Colorectal Polyps: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title Improvement Effect of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis MH-02 in Patients Receiving Resection of Colorectal Polyps: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_full Improvement Effect of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis MH-02 in Patients Receiving Resection of Colorectal Polyps: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Improvement Effect of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis MH-02 in Patients Receiving Resection of Colorectal Polyps: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Improvement Effect of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis MH-02 in Patients Receiving Resection of Colorectal Polyps: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_short Improvement Effect of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis MH-02 in Patients Receiving Resection of Colorectal Polyps: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_sort improvement effect of bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis mh-02 in patients receiving resection of colorectal polyps: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35833120
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.940500
work_keys_str_mv AT liuhui improvementeffectofbifidobacteriumanimalissubsplactismh02inpatientsreceivingresectionofcolorectalpolypsarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT zhangkaige improvementeffectofbifidobacteriumanimalissubsplactismh02inpatientsreceivingresectionofcolorectalpolypsarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT liupeng improvementeffectofbifidobacteriumanimalissubsplactismh02inpatientsreceivingresectionofcolorectalpolypsarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT xuxuan improvementeffectofbifidobacteriumanimalissubsplactismh02inpatientsreceivingresectionofcolorectalpolypsarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT zhouyuyang improvementeffectofbifidobacteriumanimalissubsplactismh02inpatientsreceivingresectionofcolorectalpolypsarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT ganlihong improvementeffectofbifidobacteriumanimalissubsplactismh02inpatientsreceivingresectionofcolorectalpolypsarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT yaoling improvementeffectofbifidobacteriumanimalissubsplactismh02inpatientsreceivingresectionofcolorectalpolypsarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT libin improvementeffectofbifidobacteriumanimalissubsplactismh02inpatientsreceivingresectionofcolorectalpolypsarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT chentingtao improvementeffectofbifidobacteriumanimalissubsplactismh02inpatientsreceivingresectionofcolorectalpolypsarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT fangnian improvementeffectofbifidobacteriumanimalissubsplactismh02inpatientsreceivingresectionofcolorectalpolypsarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial